Predictive models in ecotoxicology: Bridging the gap between scientific progress and regulatory applicability—Remarks and research needs

This paper concludes a special series of 7 articles (4 on toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic [TK-TD] models and 3 on quantitative structure-activity relationship [QSAR] models) published in previous issues of Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). The present paper summarizes the special series articles and highlights their contribution to the topic of increasing the regulatory applicability of effect models. For both TK-TD and QSAR approaches, we then describe the main research needs. The use of TK-TD models for describing sublethal effects must be better developed, particularly through the improvement of the dynamic energy budget (DEBtox) approach. The potential of TK-TD models for moving from lower (molecular) to higher (population) hierarchical levels is highlighted as a promising research line. Some relevant issues to improve the acceptance of QSAR models at the regulatory level are also described, such as increased transparency of the performance assessment and of the modeling algorithms, model documentation, relevance of the chosen target for regulatory needs, and improved mechanistic interpretability. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;00:000-000. © 2019 SETAC.

[1]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Real External Predictivity of QSAR Models: How To Evaluate It? Comparison of Different Validation Criteria and Proposal of Using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  QSAR models for bioconcentration: is the increase in the complexity justified by more accurate predictions? , 2015, Chemosphere.

[3]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  Population-level consequences of spatially heterogeneous exposure to heavy metals in soil: An individual-based model of springtails , 2013 .

[4]  David A. Winkler,et al.  Understanding the Roles of the "Two QSARs" , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[5]  Philippe Veber,et al.  Fit Reduced GUTS Models Online: From Theory to Practice. , 2018, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[6]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  Beware of Unreliable Q2! A Comparative Study of Regression Metrics for Predictivity Assessment of QSAR Models , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  Pernille Thorbek,et al.  Incorporating toxicokinetics into an individual-based model for more realistic pesticide exposure estimates: A case study of the wood mouse , 2014 .

[8]  Marco Vighi,et al.  Acceptable‐by‐design QSARs to predict the dietary biomagnification of organic chemicals in fish , 2018, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[9]  Marco Vighi,et al.  Predictive Models in Ecotoxicology: Bridging the Gap Between Scientific Progress and Regulatory Applicability. , 2018, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[10]  Andreas Focks,et al.  Integrating chemical fate and population-level effect models for pesticides at landscape scale: New options for risk assessment , 2014 .

[11]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Trust, But Verify: On the Importance of Chemical Structure Curation in Cheminformatics and QSAR Modeling Research , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[12]  Davide Ballabio,et al.  Structural alerts for the identification of bioaccumulative compounds , 2018, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[13]  Uko Maran,et al.  QSAR DataBank repository: open and linked qualitative and quantitative structure–activity relationship models , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[14]  C. Hansch.  Quantitative approach to biochemical structure-activity relationships , 1969 .

[15]  K. Roy,et al.  Be aware of error measures. Further studies on validation of predictive QSAR models , 2016 .

[16]  Cheryl A Murphy,et al.  Incorporating Suborganismal Processes into Dynamic Energy Budget Models for Ecological Risk Assessment , 2018, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[17]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Dynamic Energy Budget theory meets individual‐based modelling: a generic and accessible implementation , 2012 .

[18]  Francisco Torrens,et al.  Prediction of Aquatic Toxicity of Benzene Derivatives to Tetrahymena pyriformis According to OECD Principles. , 2016, Current pharmaceutical design.

[19]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  Comments on the Definition of the Q2 Parameter for QSAR Validation , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[20]  Lulu Zhang,et al.  Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of lead in the soil invertebrate Enchytraeus crypticus. , 2017, Environmental pollution.

[21]  Ralph Kühne,et al.  PBT assessment under REACH: Screening for low aquatic bioaccumulation with QSAR classifications based on physicochemical properties to replace BCF in vivo testing on fish. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  Thomas G. Preuss,et al.  Demographic Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic Modeling of Lethal Effects. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Marco Vighi,et al.  Ecotoxicology: The Challenges for the 21st Century , 2013 .

[24]  Shilpi Chauhan,et al.  Use of the Monte Carlo Method for OECD Principles‐Guided QSAR Modeling of SIRT1 Inhibitors , 2017, Archiv der Pharmazie.

[25]  Ralph Kühne,et al.  External Validation and Prediction Employing the Predictive Squared Correlation Coefficient Test Set Activity Mean vs Training Set Activity Mean , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[26]  Steve Norman,et al.  Modelling effects of time-variable exposure to the pyrethroid beta-cyfluthrin on rainbow trout early life stages , 2018, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[27]  A M Richard,et al.  An automated curation procedure for addressing chemical errors and inconsistencies in public datasets used in QSAR modelling$ , 2016, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[28]  Paul C Thomas,et al.  How in silico and QSAR approaches can increase confidence in environmental hazard and risk assessment , 2018, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[29]  Ruili Huang,et al.  CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project , 2016, Environmental health perspectives.

[30]  D. Young,et al.  Are the Chemical Structures in Your QSAR Correct , 2008 .

[31]  Davide Ballabio,et al.  Multivariate comparison of classification performance measures , 2017 .

[32]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  On the Misleading Use of QF32 for QSAR Model Comparison , 2018, Molecular informatics.

[33]  Elke I. Zimmer,et al.  Simplified dynamic energy budget model for analysing ecotoxicity data. , 2012 .

[34]  Albert A Koelmans,et al.  Dynamics and recovery of a sediment-exposed Chironomus riparius population: A modelling approach. , 2016, Environmental pollution.

[35]  S. H. Bennekou,et al.  Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms , 2018, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[36]  José Paulo Sousa,et al.  Towards a landscape scale management of pesticides: ERA using changes in modelled occupancy and abundance to assess long-term population impacts of pesticides. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  Helmut Segner,et al.  Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe , 2018, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[38]  R. Sibly,et al.  An energy budget agent-based model of earthworm populations and its application to study the effects of pesticides , 2014, Ecological modelling.

[39]  David A. Winkler,et al.  Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[40]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  How to Evaluate the Quality of Toxicokinetic—Toxicodynamic Models in the Context of Environmental Risk Assessment , 2018, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[41]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  General unified threshold model of survival--a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Thomas G Preuss,et al.  Short-term to long-term extrapolation of lethal effects of an herbicide on the marine mysid shrimp Americamysis Bahia by use of the General Unified Threshold Model of Survival (GUTS). , 2019, Integrated environmental assessment and management.