Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder

The much-lamented gap between theory and practice in education cannot be filled by practical knowledge alone or by explanatory knowledge alone. Principled practical knowledge (PPK) is a type of knowledge that has characteristics of both practical know-how and scientific theory. Like basic scientific theory, PPK meets standards of explanatory coherence. However, its main function is not explanation or prediction but practical guidance. PPK grows out of efforts to solve practical problems, but it requires additional effort invested in producing knowledge that goes beyond what is required for the task at hand yet not so far beyond as to be unusable by practitioners. The Wright brothers’ construction of PPK to address problems of flight control is used as a model for building such knowledge in the learning sciences. Design-based research in the learning sciences may motivate research into basic theoretical questions, but it is unlikely to contribute directly to answering them. Extending design-based research to the creation of PPK can, however, increase the generalizability of knowledge produced through design work and provide a ladder leading to sometimes radical design improvement.

[1]  J. Dewey,et al.  PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL PRACTICE. , 1900, Science.

[2]  M. Lampert.  Knowing, doing, and teaching multiplication , 1986 .

[3]  D. Laplane.  Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[4]  R. H. Walters.  The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence , 1960 .

[5]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Usability engineering methods for software developers , 2005, CACM.

[6]  Mark Eppler.  The Wright Way : 7 Problem-Solving Principles from the Wright Brothers That Can Make Your Business Soar , 2003 .

[7]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Ontological Innovation and the Role of Theory in Design Experiments , 2004 .

[8]  L. Schauble,et al.  Design Experiments in Educational Research , 2003 .

[9]  W. Sandoval.  Developing Learning Theory by Refining Conjectures Embodied in Educational Designs , 2004 .

[10]  D. Mauer,et al.  " Phonological Awareness , 2012 .

[11]  Matthias Müller-Hannemann,et al.  Algorithm Engineering: Bridging the Gap between Algorithm Theory and Practice [outcome of a Dagstuhl Seminar] , 2010, Algorithm Engineering.

[12]  Marvin W. McFarland,et al.  "The Papers of Wilbur and Orville Wright, including the Chanute - Wright letters and other papers of Octave Chanute", Volume one: "1899-1905", Volume Two: "1906-1948", Marvin W. McFarland, New York-Toronto-London 1953 : [recenzja] / E. O. , 1957 .

[13]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Research for Tomorrow's Schools: Disciplined Inquiry for Education. Report of the Committee on Educational Research of the National Academy of Education , 1970 .

[14]  Bruce A. Murray,et al.  Gaining Alphabetic Insight : Is Phoneme Manipulation Skill or Identity Knowledge Causal ? , 2004 .

[15]  P. Thagard,et al.  Coherence in Thought and Action , 2000 .

[16]  A. Collins,et al.  Designs that fly: what the history of aeronautics tells us about the future of design-based research in education , 2012 .

[17]  E. Wilson.  Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge , 1998 .

[18]  Yujing Ni,et al.  Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias , 2005 .

[19]  John David Anderson,et al.  The Airplane: A History of Its Technology , 2003 .

[20]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[21]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for first formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure. , 1994 .

[22]  Robbie Case,et al.  The Role of Central Conceptual Structures in the Development of Children's Thought , 1995 .

[23]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1978 .

[24]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Innovation in the Absence of Principled Knowledge: The Case of the Wright Brothers , 2009 .

[25]  Francisco J. Ayala,et al.  Science, evolution, and creationism , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[27]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  A Brief History of Knowledge Building , 2010 .

[28]  Daniel C. Edelson.  Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design , 2002 .

[29]  S. K. Schiff,et al.  Research for Tomorrow's Schools: Disciplined Inquiry for Education. , 1970 .

[30]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[31]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[32]  Thomas V. O'Brien,et al.  Bridging Theory and Practice in Teacher Education , 2007 .

[33]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Thomas Bartz-Beielstein,et al.  Experimental Methods for the Analysis of Optimization Algorithms , 2010 .

[35]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[36]  John M. Swales,et al.  Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge , 1999 .

[37]  J. Moss.  Developing Children's Understanding of the Rational Numbers: A New Model and an Experimental Curriculum , 1999 .

[38]  Celia Stendler Lavatelli,et al.  Piaget's theory applied to an early childhood curriculum. , 1970 .

[39]  Karsten Klein,et al.  Algorithm Engineering: Concepts and Practice , 2010, Experimental Methods for the Analysis of Optimization Algorithms.

[40]  Peter Maurer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , 2022 .

[41]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[42]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[43]  R. Sawyer.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[44]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .