Integrating open science education into an undergraduate health professional research program

Objective: Open science (OS) is a global movement focused on improving research equity, reproducibility, and transparency of research outputs in publicly funded research. While OS education in academia is becoming more common, examples of health sciences librarians providing OS training are not. This paper describes how a librarian collaborated with teaching faculty and a research program coordinator to integrate an OS curriculum into an undergraduate professional practice course and assess students' perceptions of OS after participating. Methods: A librarian developed an OS-specific curriculum for an undergraduate professional practice course in Nutrition. This course is part of the First Year Research Experience (FYRE) program, which is integrated into 13-week undergraduate courses to introduce students to core elements of the research process in their first year of study by carrying out a research project. The OS curriculum included an Introduction to OS class, a requirement that students share their research outputs in the Open Science Framework, and an assignment asking students to reflect on their experience learning about and practicing OS. Twenty-one of 30 students consented to having their reflection assignment undergo thematic analysis. Results: Students indicated transparency, accountability, accessibility to research outputs, and increased efficiency as positive attributes of OS. The time commitment, fear of being scooped, and concerns over having research be misinterpreted were considered negative attributes. 90% (n=19) of students indicated that they intend to practice OS in the future. Conclusion: Based on strong engagement from the students, we believe that this OS curriculum could be adapted to other undergraduate or graduate student contexts where a research project is required.

[1]  A. Deardorff,et al.  Health sciences librarians' engagement in open science: a scoping review , 2021, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[2]  Neville E. Sanjana Voices of the new generation: open science is good for science (and for you) , 2021, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  E. Turner,et al.  An open science pathway for drug marketing authorization—Registered drug approval , 2021, PLoS medicine.

[4]  D. Hicks Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health , 2021, Accountability in research.

[5]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Open science as a path to education of new psychophysiologists. , 2021, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  Felipe Nathan deOliveira-Lopes,et al.  Where Do Early Career Researchers Stand on Open Science Practices? A Survey Within the Max Planck Society , 2021, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics.

[7]  M. Kasuya,et al.  Summer School: A warm journey through teaching microbiology to undergraduate students. , 2020, FEMS microbiology letters.

[8]  A. M. López Hernandez,et al.  Expanding the actions of Open Government in higher education sector: From web transparency to Open Science , 2020, PloS one.

[9]  J. Pither,et al.  Implementation of an Open Science Instruction Program for Undergraduates , 2020, Data Intelligence.

[10]  C. Houghton,et al.  Exploring factors that influence the practice of Open Science by early career health researchers: a mixed methods study. , 2020, HRB open research.

[11]  Ariel Deardorff,et al.  Why do biomedical researchers learn to program? An exploratory investigation , 2020, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[12]  A. Seth,et al.  Editorial: Open science in consciousness research , 2019, Neuroscience of consciousness.

[13]  J. Lieffers,et al.  A Course-Based First-Year Research Experience for Undergraduate Nutrition Students. , 2019, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[14]  Joachim Schöpfel,et al.  PhD Training on Open Science in French Universities , 2019 .

[15]  P Huston,et al.  Reaping the benefits of Open Data in public health. , 2019, Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada.

[16]  Marc Buyse,et al.  Open science: The open clinical trials data journey , 2019, Clinical trials.

[17]  R. Hoskins,et al.  Open science disrupting the status quo in academic libraries: A perspective of Zimbabwe , 2019, The Journal of Academic Librarianship.

[18]  B. Hamm,et al.  Clinical trials in radiology and data sharing: results from a survey of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) research committee , 2019, European Radiology.

[19]  Julia F. Strand,et al.  Publishing Open, Reproducible Research With Undergraduates , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[20]  Andrew H. Hales,et al.  Improving Psychological Science through Transparency and Openness: An Overview , 2018, Perspectives on Behavior Science.

[21]  D. Ostwald,et al.  Digital open science—Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research , 2018, PLoS biology.

[22]  Tony Ross-Hellauer,et al.  Open Science Training Handbook , 2018 .

[23]  Mehmet Ali Öztürk,et al.  Early career researchers want Open Science , 2017, Genome Biology.

[24]  G. Rouleau,et al.  The Tanenbaum Open Science Institute: Leading a Paradigm Shift at the Montreal Neurological Institute , 2017, Neuron.

[25]  D. R. Raman,et al.  Imagining tomorrow's university in an era of open science , 2017, F1000Research.

[26]  Ariel Deardorff,et al.  Open Science Framework (OSF) , 2017, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[27]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  How open science helps researchers succeed , 2016, eLife.

[28]  Birgit Schmidt,et al.  Stepping up Open Science Training for European Research , 2016, Publ..

[29]  Brian Owens,et al.  DATA SHARING. Montreal institute going 'open' to accelerate science. , 2016, Science.

[30]  M. Watson,et al.  When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’? , 2015, Genome Biology.

[31]  Jennifer C Molloy,et al.  Perspectives on Open Science and Scientific Data Sharing: An Interdisciplinary Workshop , 2014, Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS.

[32]  Sarah J. Tracy Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact , 2012 .

[33]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[34]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[35]  Jennifer A. Moon Reflection in Learning & Professional Development: Theory & Practice. , 1999 .

[36]  Merryl Hammond,et al.  Self-Directed Learning: Critical Practice , 1991 .

[37]  Evviva Weinraub Lajoie,et al.  Training the Next Generation of Open Source Developers: A Case Study of OSU Libraries & Press’ Technology Training Program , 2015 .

[38]  klaguia Prepublication Data Sharing , 2009 .