An event-related potential study on the observation of erroneous everyday actions

Recent experiments have demonstrated that error-related negativity (ERN) is not only elicited when people commit errors, but also when they observe others committing errors. The present study investigates whether this observed ERN is also present when participants observe execution errors in an everyday context. Participants observed short sequences of pictures showing steps of everyday actions ending either erroneously or correctly. Participants were instructed to indicate by a delayed response whether the observed action was correctly executed or not. The results showed a large P300 for execution errors compared with the observation of correct sequences, but no ERN activity was found. The present experiment indicates that the detection of execution errors in observation does not rely on the error processing mechanism responsible for generating the ERN. The increased P300 amplitudes suggest a more general monitoring process that signals that the occurrence of unexpected events is involved in the detection of execution errors.

[1]  Rafal Bogacz,et al.  Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[2]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  A Model-Averaging Approach to Replication : The Case of p rep , 2009 .

[3]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[4]  Sander Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  D Yves von Cramon,et al.  Premotor cortex in observing erroneous action: an fMRI study. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[7]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[8]  Kirsten G. Volz,et al.  A common neural system signaling the need for behavioral changes , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Wouter Hulstijn,et al.  Action monitoring in motor control: ERPs following selection and execution errors in a force production task. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[10]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[11]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[12]  W. Hulstijn,et al.  Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteers , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[13]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Tucker,et al.  Regulating action: alternating activation of midline frontal and motor cortical networks , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Juliana Yordanova,et al.  Parallel systems of error processing in the brain , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Nonvisual Feedback Loops during Reaching: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Evidence for hierarchical error processing in the human brain , 2006, Neuroscience.

[18]  P. Liddle,et al.  External Behavior Monitoring Mirrors Internal Behavior Monitoring , 2005 .

[19]  P Ullsperger,et al.  The P300 to novel and target events: a spatio–temporal dipole model analysis , 1995, Neuroreport.

[20]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of error correction. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Ralf H. Trippe,et al.  Parallel brain activity for self-generated and observed errors , 2004 .

[22]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  D. Tucker,et al.  Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Tucker,et al.  Medial Frontal Cortex in Action Monitoring , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  Are all medial frontal negativities created equal ? Toward a richer empirical basis for theories of action monitoring , 2003 .