Web Databases Descriptors Defined by Means of Pseudo – Natural Language Items

In recent years many approaches into web-content development methods can be observed. In spite of many similarities in their description and formats; as in Dublin Core or LOM (Learning Object Metadata), the characteristic features of these descriptors have not been strictly defined yet. What is more complexity of the available standards brings the user with difficulties to use them. The paper introduces development interfaces, supported by graph theories, for applications description. The web applications unification was determined using frames of the Multimedia Applications Management Shell (MAMS), together with various controlling facilities and functions of interactions. The elaborated shell was provided with RDF and RSS format compatibilities, needed for the web resources safe distribution.

[1]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  Knowledge Interchange Format , 1991, KR.

[2]  Marcin Bernas.  Interactions Validation Methods for Training Resources Control Engine Development , 2008 .

[3]  吴刚,et al.  System II： A Native RDF Repository Based on the Hypergraph Representation for RDF Data Model , 2009 .

[4]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  Extensible Markup Language (XML) , 1997, World Wide Web J..

[5]  Jeff Heflin,et al.  SHOE: A Knowledge Representation Language for Internet Applications , 1999 .

[6]  Zongmin Ma,et al.  Fuzzy RDF: A data model to represent fuzzy metadata , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[7]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The Semantic Web: The Roles of XML and RDF , 2000, IEEE Internet Comput..

[8]  Richard Granger,et al.  Engines of the Brain: The Computational Instruction Set of Human Cognition , 2006, AI Mag..

[9]  Annika Hinze,et al.  Storing RDF as a graph , 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE/LEOS 3rd International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices (IEEE Cat. No.03EX726).

[10]  Brandon Muramatsu,et al.  Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata , 2002 .

[11]  Robert K. L. Gay,et al.  A knowledge-driven model to personalize e-learning , 2006, JERC.

[12]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  eXtensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition) , 2000 .

[13]  Gang Xu,et al.  A Semantic Publish/subscribe System for Selective Dissemination of the RSS Documents , 2006, 2006 Fifth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing (GCC'06).

[14]  Vinay K. Chaudhri,et al.  XOL: An XML-Based Ontology Exchange Language , 2000 .

[15]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[16]  Dan Ma.  Offering RSS Feeds: Does It Help to Gain Competitive Advantage? , 2009 .

[17]  H. Lan,et al.  SWRL : A semantic Web rule language combining OWL and ruleML , 2004 .

[18]  Gang Wu,et al.  System II: A Native RDF Repository Based on the Hypergraph Representation for RDF Data Model , 2008, WAIM.

[19]  J. Piecha,et al.  Characteristics and evaluation procedure of e-learning units , 2004 .

[20]  Edward A. Feigenbaum.  Happy Silver Anniversary, AI! , 2006, AI Mag..

[21]  Phivos Mylonas,et al.  Using ontologies and fuzzy relations in multimedia personalization , 2006, 2006 First International Workshop on Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP'06).