Dichotic multiple‐frequency auditory steady‐state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise‐exposed workers

An objective, fast, and reasonably accurate assessment test that allows for easy interpretation of the responses of the hearing thresholds at all frequencies of a conventional audiogram is needed to resolve the medicolegal aspects of an occupational hearing injury. This study evaluated the use of dichotic multiple‐frequency auditory steady‐state responses (Mf‐ASSR) to predict the hearing thresholds in workers exposed to high levels of noise. The study sample included 34 workers with noise‐induced hearing impairment. Thresholds of pure‐tone audiometry (PTA) and Mf‐ASSRs at four frequencies were assessed. The differences and correlations between the thresholds of Mf‐ASSRs and PTA were determined. The results showed that, on average, Mf‐ASSR curves corresponded well with the thresholds of the PTA contours averaged across subjects. The Mf‐ASSRs were 20 ± 8 dB, 16 ± 9 dB, 12 ± 9 dB, and 11 ± 12 dB above the thresholds of the PTA for 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, 2,000 Hz, and 4,000 Hz, respectively. The thresholds of the PTA and the Mf‐ASSRs were significantly correlated (r = 0.77–0.89). We found that the measurement of Mf‐ASSRs is easy and potentially time saving, provides a response at all dichotic multiple frequencies of the conventional audiogram, reduces variability in the interpretation of the responses, and correlates well with the behavioral hearing thresholds in subjects with occupational noise‐induced hearing impairment. Mf‐ASSR can be a valuable aid in the adjustment of compensation cases.

[1]  T W Picton,et al.  Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  Terence W Picton,et al.  Multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[3]  J. Jerger,et al.  Interactions of age, gender, and sensorineural hearing loss on ABR latency. , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[4]  M E Lutman,et al.  Guidelines on the diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss for medicolegal purposes. , 2000, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[5]  A. Herdman,et al.  Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects , 2001, Scandinavian audiology.

[6]  M P Gorga,et al.  Auditory brainstem response results as predictors of behavioral auditory thresholds in severe and profound hearing impairment , 1990, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  Carolyn J Brown,et al.  Effect of Audiometric Configuration on Threshold and Suprathreshold Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Middle-latency responses to assess objective thresholds in patients with noise-induced hearing losses and Ménière's disease , 2004, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[9]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Frequency‐Specific Audiometry Using Steady‐State Responses , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[10]  T W Picton,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Clinical Application of Dichotic Multiple-Stimulus Auditory Steady-State Responses in High-Risk Newborns and Young Children , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[12]  M. Hyde,et al.  Auditory Evoked Potentials in Audiometric Assessment of Compensation and Medicolegal Patients , 1986, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[13]  H. Mostafa OCCUPATIONAL HEARING LOSS. , 1963, The Journal of the Egyptian Medical Association.

[14]  D. Swanepoel,et al.  Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  D. Prasher,et al.  Cortical evoked potential criteria in the objective assessment of auditory threshold: a comparison of noise induced hearing loss with Ménière's disease , 1993, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[16]  Terence W Picton,et al.  Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  G M Clark,et al.  Steady‐State Evoked Potential and Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Group of Children with Absent Click‐Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Response , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[18]  L. Galán,et al.  Steady State Responses to Multiple Amplitude-Modulated Tones: An Optimized Method to Test Frequency-Specific Thresholds in Hearing-Impaired Children and Normal-Hearing Subjects , 2001, Ear and hearing.