Seismic performance of steel friction connections considering direct-repair costs

This study compares seismic losses considering initial construction costs and direct-repair costs for New Zealand steel moment-resisting frame buildings with friction connections and those with extended bolted-end-plate connections. A total of 12 buildings have been designed and analysed considering both connection types, two building heights (4-storey and 12-storey), and three locations around New Zealand (Auckland, Christchurch, and Wellington). It was found that buildings with friction connections required design to a higher design ductility, yet are generally stiffer due to larger beams being required to satisfy higher connection overstrength requirements. This resulted in the frames with friction connections experiencing lower interstorey drifts on most floors but similar peak total floor accelerations, and subsequently incurring lower drift-related seismic repair losses. Frames with friction connections tended to have lower expected net-present-costs within 50 years of the building being in service for shorter buildings and/or if located in regions of high seismicity. None of the frames with friction connections in Auckland showed any benefits due to the low seismicity of the region.

[1]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Experimental Seismic Fragility of Cold-Formed Steel Framed Gypsum Partition Walls , 2013 .

[2]  J. McCormick,et al.  PERMISSIBLE RESIDUAL DEFORMATION LEVELS FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES CONSIDERING BOTH SAFETY AND HUMAN ELEMENTS , 2008 .

[3]  George Charles Clifton,et al.  Semi-rigid joints for moment-resisting steel framed seismic-resisting systems , 2005 .

[4]  Gregory A. MacRae,et al.  The Asymmetric Friction Connection with Belleville Springs in the Sliding Hinge Joint , 2014 .

[5]  H. Thio,et al.  Attenuation Relations of Strong Ground Motion in Japan Using Site Classification Based on Predominant Period , 2006 .

[6]  善裕 岩田,et al.  鋼構造建築物の修復限界 : 鋼構造建築物の性能設計に関する研究 その2 , 2005 .

[7]  J. Stewart,et al.  Prediction Equations for Significant Duration of Earthquake Ground Motions considering Site and Near-Source Effects , 2006 .

[8]  W. New,et al.  Standards New Zealand. , 2005 .

[9]  Timothy J. Sullivan Use of Limit State Loss versus Intensity Models for Simplified Estimation of Expected Annual Loss , 2016 .

[10]  Brendon A. Bradley The seismic demand hazard and importance of the conditioning intensity measure , 2012 .

[11]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames , 2002 .

[12]  Vladimir Sigmund,et al.  Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings , 2010 .

[13]  J. Baker,et al.  Correlation of Spectral Acceleration Values from NGA Ground Motion Models , 2008 .

[14]  G. Charles Clifton,et al.  THE SLIDING HINGE JOINT MOMENT CONNECTION , 2010 .

[15]  B. Bradley A generalized conditional intensity measure approach and holistic ground‐motion selection , 2010 .

[16]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Expected earthquake damage and repair costs in reinforced concrete frame buildings , 2012 .

[17]  Hsen Khoo Development of the low damage self-centering Sliding Hinge Joint , 2013 .

[18]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Efficient evaluation of performance-based earthquake engineering equations , 2009 .

[19]  Gregory A. MacRae,et al.  Development of the self-centering Sliding Hinge Joint with friction ring springs , 2012 .

[20]  J. Chase,et al.  Low damage brace using a Symmetrical Friction Connection (SFC) detail , 2015 .

[21]  Pilar Villamor,et al.  National Seismic Hazard Model for New Zealand: 2010 Update , 2012 .

[22]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Probabilistic Characterization of Spatially Correlated Response Spectra for Earthquakes in Japan , 2009 .

[23]  Frederic Marquis,et al.  Post-Earthquake Assessment and Repairability of RC Buildings: Lessons from Canterbury and Emerging Challenges , 2015 .

[24]  Hao Zhou,et al.  Proposed design models for the asymmetric friction connection , 2015 .

[25]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  A New Zealand‐Specific Pseudospectral Acceleration Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation for Active Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on Foreign Models , 2013 .

[26]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  A Framework for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering of Bridge-Abutment Systems , 2012 .

[27]  B. Bradley A ground motion selection algorithm based on the generalized conditional intensity measure approach , 2012 .

[28]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Improved seismic hazard model with application to probabilistic seismic demand analysis , 2007 .

[29]  T. Jordan,et al.  OpenSHA: A Developing Community-modeling Environment for Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2003 .

[30]  G. Charles Clifton,et al.  RESEARCH ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEEL STRUCTURES , 2015 .

[31]  L. Megget,et al.  Bulletin of the New Zealand society for earthquake engineering , 2002 .

[32]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation , 2012 .

[33]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  A Seismic Performance Classification Framework to Provide Increased Seismic Resilience , 2014 .

[34]  J. G. Chase,et al.  Experimental Studies on Cyclic Performance of Column Base Strong Axis–Aligned Asymmetric Friction Connections , 2016 .

[35]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  A Ground Motion Prediction Equation for the Horizontal Component of Cumulative Absolute Velocity (CAV) Based on the PEER-NGA Strong Motion Database , 2010 .

[36]  N. Null Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings , 2014 .

[37]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Correlation of Significant Duration with Amplitude and Cumulative Intensity Measures and Its Use in Ground Motion Selection , 2011 .

[38]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Seismic loss estimation for efficient decision making , 2009 .

[39]  Robert E. Bachman,et al.  Creating Fragility Functions for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2007 .