Evaluating Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing Barriers With Interpretive Structural Modeling

Environmentally conscious manufacturing (ECM) has been a mainstay of sustainable organizational practices for at least two decades. The adoption of ECM practices needs to overcome a variety of barriers. To overcome these barriers and adopt these crucial practices, understanding their structure and relationship is needed. Interpretive structural modeling (ISM), can help us do this. ISM has been applied to a number of organizational decision problems. It is a technique that is helpful to managers in organizing the relationships among a series of factors that may influence their decision. The decision support technique has a long history dating back to the late 1960's and early 1970's. Yet, its application and investigation by researchers to a variety of topical areas has not occurred until very recently. This lack of application is especially true for investigation into topics related to ECM. We find that the barriers to this organizational practice can be further investigated and analyzed with ISM. This paper seeks to provide and overview of major barriers and an illustrative example of this procedure with initial insights. More complete evaluation and implementation of this technique is recommended for its validation.

[1]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and market Concepts in Technological Evolution : Research Policy , 1985 .

[2]  K. Dechant,et al.  Environmental leadership: From compliance to competitive advantage , 1994 .

[3]  C. Carter,et al.  Environmental Purchasing: Benchmarking Our German Counterparts , 1998 .

[4]  Askiner Gungor,et al.  Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey , 1999 .

[5]  D. Keith Denton,et al.  Employee involvement, pollution control and pieces to the puzzle , 1999 .

[6]  M. Epstein,et al.  Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers , 2001 .

[7]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  THE GAP BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE , 2006 .

[8]  Joseph Sarkis.  Manufacturing’s role in corporate environmental sustainability ‐ Concerns for the new millennium , 2001 .

[9]  B. Daily,et al.  Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management , 2001 .

[10]  David Evans,et al.  How LCA studies deal with uncertainty , 2002 .

[11]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Operations of a Computer Equipment Resource Recovery Facility , 2003 .

[12]  M. Epstein,et al.  Improving Sustainability Performance: Specifying, Implementing and Measuring Key Principles , 2003 .

[13]  V. Brown,et al.  REACHing for chemical safety. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Three Strategies to Overcome the Limitations of Life‐Cycle Assessment , 2004 .

[15]  Nalini Govindarajulu,et al.  Motivating employees for environmental improvement , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[16]  Erik Sundin,et al.  Products in environmental management systems: drivers, barriers and experiences , 2005 .

[17]  R. Shankar,et al.  ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIONS AMONG THE BARRIERS OF REVERSE LOGISTICS , 2005 .

[18]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  Changing Environmental Practice: Understanding and Overcoming the Organizational and Psychological Barriers , 2005 .

[19]  Stuart C Burgess,et al.  The development of a remanufacturing platform design: A strategic response to the Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment , 2005 .

[20]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  IT-enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[21]  S. Khoury,et al.  Greening the Supply Chain , 2006 .