Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication

Research examining online political forums has until now been overwhelmingly guided by two broad perspectives: (1) a deliberative conception of democratic communication and (2) a diverse collection of incommensurable multi-sphere approaches. While these literatures have contributed many insightful observations, their disadvantages have left many interesting communicative dynamics largely unexplored. This article seeks to introduce a new framework for evaluating online political forums (based on the work of Jürgen Habermas and Lincoln Dahlberg) that addresses the shortcomings of prior approaches by identifying three distinct, overlapping models of democracy that forums may manifest: the liberal, the communitarian and the deliberative democratic. For each model, a set of definitional variables drawn from the broader online forum literature is documented and discussed.

[1]  John Suler,et al.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  B. Sweetman Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy , 1997 .

[3]  Ananda Mitra,et al.  Virtual commonality: looking for India on the Internet , 1997 .

[4]  Howard Eisner,et al.  Information Age , 2008, Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering.

[5]  John Rawls,et al.  政治自由主义 = Political liberalism , 2000 .

[6]  W. Bennett Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age , 2008 .

[7]  Milbrey W. McLaughlin,et al.  Youth Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century , 2002 .

[8]  張卿卿 Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication: Financial Statements , 1988 .

[9]  Bart Cammaerts,et al.  Online Political Debate, Unbounded Citizenship, and the Problematic Nature of a Transnational Public Sphere , 2005 .

[10]  Anthony G. Wilhelm Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is on‐line political discussion? , 1998 .

[11]  Allison M. McCormack,et al.  Information Age , 1979 .

[12]  John Gastil,et al.  By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy Through Deliberative Elections , 2000 .

[13]  S. Keeter,et al.  A New Engagement , 2006 .

[14]  John Kelly and Bruce Etling Mapping Iran's online public: Politics and culture in the Persian blogosphere , 2008 .

[15]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  "Deliberative Public Opinion in Presidential Primaries: Evidence from the Online Deliberative Poll" * , 2004 .

[16]  W. Bennett Civic Life Online : Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth , 2007 .

[17]  S. Albrecht Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet , 2006 .

[18]  Nan Zheng,et al.  Issue Publics on the Web: Applying Network Theory to the War Blogosphere , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Martin Lea,et al.  Contexts of computer-mediated communication , 1992 .

[20]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[21]  Lincoln Dahlberg The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[22]  Lincoln Dahlberg,et al.  Democracy via Cyberspace , 2001, New Media Soc..

[23]  Stephen K. White,et al.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy@@@The Cambridge Companion to Habermas , 1997 .

[24]  David M. Anderson,et al.  The Civic Web: Online Politics and Democratic Values , 2002 .

[25]  G. Smith ANARCHY, STATE, AND UTOPIA , 1976 .

[26]  Antje Gimmler Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet , 2001 .

[27]  S. Coleman,et al.  Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation , 2001 .

[28]  Nancy Fraser Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy , 2016, Public Space Reader.

[29]  Janice Singer,et al.  User-Generated Online Video and the Atlantic Canadian Public Sphere: A YouTube Study , 2008 .

[30]  Aaron Smith and Lee Rainie The internet and the 2008 election , 2008 .

[31]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  Public Deliberation goes On-line? , 2008 .

[32]  Victor W. Pickard Cooptation and cooperation: institutional exemplars of democratic internet technology , 2008, New Media Soc..

[33]  D. A. Thomas,et al.  Liberalism and the Limits of Justice , 1983 .

[34]  Eric S. Fredin The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System , 1999 .

[35]  J. Bohman Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy , 1996 .

[36]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[37]  Certified by Accepted by , 1997 .

[38]  John Gastil,et al.  A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups , 2002 .

[39]  K. Andersen,et al.  A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen , 2007, Perspectives on Politics.

[40]  John M. Sides,et al.  Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics , 2010, Perspectives on Politics.

[41]  Diana C. Mutz Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[42]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[43]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming in electronic communication , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[44]  C. Ess Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[45]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Capitalizing on the Net: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community , 2008 .

[46]  Nathaniel Poor,et al.  Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: The Website Slashdot , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[47]  Peter Dahlgren The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[48]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme , 2007, Regular Issue.

[49]  D. Buckingham Youth, Identity, and Digital Media , 2007 .

[50]  K. A. Hill,et al.  Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet , 1998 .

[51]  Jeremy Hunsinger Toward a Transdisciplinary Internet Research , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[52]  Natalie Fenton,et al.  New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere , 2003, New Media Soc..

[53]  Robert A. Caro,et al.  The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York , 1975 .

[54]  R. Kies,et al.  Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy , 2005 .

[55]  Scott Wright,et al.  Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums , 2007, New Media Soc..

[56]  Philip Selznick,et al.  The Communitarian Persuasion , 2002 .

[57]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Children's Use of the Internet: Reflections on the Emerging Research Agenda , 2003, New Media Soc..

[58]  B. Latour On Technical Mediation , 1994 .

[59]  Joshua R. Smith Debate, Division, and Diversity: Political Discourse Networks in USENET Newsgroups , 2005 .

[60]  Fernanda Fuentes,et al.  Digital Democracy. Discourse and decision making in the information age , 2001 .

[61]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[62]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[63]  Joshua Cohen,et al.  DELIBERATION AND DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY , 2005, Philosophy, Politics, Democracy.

[64]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[65]  R. Inglehart Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies , 1997 .

[66]  Matthew R. Kerbel Netroots: Online Progressives and the Transformation of American Politics , 2009 .

[67]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers , 2007 .

[68]  J. Jensen Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government‐Sponsored – A Comparison , 2003 .

[69]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users , 2004 .

[70]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[71]  Luisa Doldi,et al.  Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth , 2009 .

[72]  Stephen L. Elkin Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform , 1991 .

[73]  Adam Joinson,et al.  Storming and Forming a Normative Response to a Deception Revealed Online , 2005 .

[74]  Ariadne Vromen,et al.  Building virtual spaces: Young people, participation and the Internet , 2008 .

[75]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[76]  Zizi Papacharissi The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[77]  T. Jordan Language and Libertarianism: The Politics of Cyberculture and the Culture of Cyberpolitics , 2001 .

[78]  J. Dryzek Deliberative democracy and beyond : liberals, critics, contestations , 2000 .

[79]  Tarik Sabry A New American Democracy , 2007 .

[80]  Russell Frank,et al.  When the going gets tough, the tough go photoshopping: September 11 and the newslore of vengeance and victimization , 2004, New Media Soc..

[81]  C. Sunstein Republic.com 2.0 , 2007 .

[82]  I. Berlin,et al.  Four Essays on Liberty , 1969 .

[83]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda , 1993 .

[84]  Steven G. Jones Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety , 1997 .

[85]  R. Williams,et al.  Politics and technology , 1971 .

[86]  David A. Huffaker,et al.  The language of online leadership: gender and youth engagement on the internet. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[87]  Warren Sack Discourse Architecture and Very Large-scale Conversation , 2009 .

[88]  Sandra Weber,et al.  Imaging, Keyboarding, and Posting Identities: Young People and New Media Technologies , 2007 .

[89]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .