Promoting Truthful Communication Through Ex-Post Disclosure

An extensive literature documents that providing the right incentives can reduce deception. We hypothesize that truthful communication can be promoted by the threat of ex-post disclosure, even in the absence of financial consequences. Our experiment identifies the effect of ex-post disclosure using a sender-receiver game in which the receiver can detect a dishonest message in one condition, but not in another. The advantages of a laboratory experiment are that it rules out reputational concerns by providing full anonymity and holds constant information availability. We find that ex-post disclosure almost doubles the incidence of truth-telling. Interestingly, the effect of ex-post disclosure on truthful communication is present for males, but not for females.

[1]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  What you don't know won't hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games , 2006 .

[2]  G. Charness,et al.  Promises in contract design , 2013 .

[3]  Jordi Brandts,et al.  The strategy versus the direct-response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons , 2011 .

[4]  E. Miguel,et al.  Corruption, Norms, and Legal Enforcement: Evidence from Diplomatic Parking Tickets , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Ting Jiang,et al.  Cheating in Mind Games: The Subtlety of Rules Matters , 2013 .

[6]  J. Andreoni Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects , 2009 .

[7]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. , 2003, JAMA.

[8]  M. Dufwenberg,et al.  Working Papers in Economics and Statistics Deception through Telling the Truth?! Experimental Evidence from Individuals and Teams Deception through Telling the Truth?! Experimental Evidence from Individuals and Teams , 2022 .

[9]  J. Geanakoplos,et al.  Psychological games and sequential rationality , 1989 .

[10]  M. Villeval,et al.  Dishonesty under scrutiny , 2014, Journal of the Economic Science Association.

[11]  Aurora García-Gallego,et al.  The role of ex post transparency in information transmission—An experiment , 2014 .

[12]  J. Hughes,et al.  First Do No Harm: Adverse Effects of Grouping Deviant Youth for Skills Training , 1999 .

[13]  Ernesto Reuben,et al.  Fairness Perceptions and Prosocial Emotions in the Power to Take , 2010 .

[14]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Gender differences in deception , 2008 .

[15]  Bernd Irlenbusch,et al.  Editorial Addresses , 1999 .

[16]  Daniel Treisman,et al.  The causes of corruption: a cross-national study , 2000 .

[17]  Menusch Khadjavi,et al.  On the Interaction of Deterrence and Emotions , 2015 .

[18]  Eric van Damme,et al.  Lying about what you know or about what you do? [Dataset] , 2013 .

[19]  Roberto A. Weber,et al.  Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness , 2007 .

[20]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[21]  Ronald Peeters,et al.  Beliefs and truth-telling: A laboratory experiment , 2015 .

[22]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Pride and Prejudice: The Human Side of Incentive Theory , 2006 .

[23]  D. Ariely,et al.  Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  Topi Miettinen,et al.  Communication and Guilt in a Prisoner's Dilemma , 2008 .

[25]  Amihai Glazer,et al.  A Signaling Explanation for Charity , 1996 .

[26]  Marta Serra-Garcia,et al.  Lying About What You Know or About What You Do? , 2011 .

[27]  Carmen Tanner,et al.  Preferences for Truthfulness: Heterogeneity Among and Within Individuals , 2012 .

[28]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Deception: The role of guilt , 2013 .

[29]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Guilt in Games , 2007 .

[30]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  Promises and Partnership , 2006 .

[31]  J. Qiu,et al.  Car mechanics in the lab : investigating the behavior of real experts on experimental markets for credence goods , 2014 .

[32]  M. Bateson,et al.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting , 2006, Biology Letters.

[33]  Andreas Hackethal,et al.  Financial Advisors: A Case of Babysitters? , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  René M. Stulz,et al.  The Economics of Conflicts of Interest in Financial Institutions , 2006 .

[35]  Gary Charness,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 2022 .

[36]  Marc Vorsatz,et al.  An experimental study of truth-telling in a sender-receiver game , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..

[37]  Christoph Vanberg,et al.  WHY DO PEOPLE KEEP THEIR PROMISES? AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF TWO EXPLANATIONS , 2008 .

[38]  Gregory J. DeAngelo,et al.  Deterrence, expected cost, uncertainty and voting: Experimental evidence , 2012 .

[39]  Uri Gneezy,et al.  Deception: The Role of Consequences , 2005 .

[40]  Peter Tufano,et al.  Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Brokers in the Mutual Fund Industry , 2007 .

[41]  Nina Mazar,et al.  The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance , 2008 .

[42]  H. Lewis Shame and guilt in neurosis. , 1971, Psychoanalytic review.

[43]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  Face-Saving or Fair-Minded: What Motivates Moral Behavior? , 2013 .

[44]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Lies in Disguise. An experimental study on cheating , 2013 .

[45]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[46]  Disclosing advisor's interests neither hurts nor helps , 2013 .

[47]  Ann Dryden Witte,et al.  Estimating the Economic Model of Crime With Individual Data , 1980 .

[48]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  The Power of Shame and the Rationality of Trust , 2007 .

[49]  *The Importance of Emotions for the Effectiveness of Social Punishment , 2009 .