The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading.

There are variations in the extent to which particular types of inferences or activations are made during reading (G. McKoon & R. Ratcliff, 1992; M. Singer, 1994). In this study, the authors investigated the influence of reading purpose (for entertainment or study) on inference generation. Participants read 2 texts aloud and 2 texts for comprehension measures. Reading purpose did not influence off-line behavior (comprehension) but did influence on-line reader behavior (thinking aloud). Readers with a study purpose more often repeated the text, acknowledged a lack of background knowledge, and evaluated the text content and writing than did readers with an entertainment purpose. This pattern was stronger for the expository text than for the narrative text. Reading purpose, and possibly text type, affects the kinds of inferences that readers generate. Hence, inferential activities are at least partially under the reader's strategic control.

[1]  P. Broek.  The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. , 1990 .

[2]  Rolf A. Zwaan.  Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. , 1994 .

[3]  P. van den Broek,et al.  Effects of Causal Structure on Immediate and Delayed Story Recall by Children with Mild Mental Retardation, Children with Learning Disabilities, and Children without Disabilities , 1997 .

[4]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  College students' conditional knowledge about reading. , 1993 .

[5]  Roy O. Freedle.  Advances in discourse processes , 1977 .

[6]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration , 1993 .

[7]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Encoding difficulty and memory: toward a unifying theory , 1986 .

[9]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Taking different perspectives on a story. , 1977 .

[10]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Forward Inferences in Narrative Text , 1993 .

[11]  K Rayner,et al.  Elaborative inferences during reading: do they occur on-line? , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  George J. Spilich,et al.  Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. , 1979 .

[13]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inferences about predictable events. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[15]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Working‐memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension , 1991 .

[16]  M. Singer,et al.  Discourse inference processes. , 1994 .

[17]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on‐line inferences and mental operations in working memory , 1993 .

[18]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992, Psychological review.

[19]  C. Spring.  Comprehension and study strategies reported by university freshmen who are good and poor readers , 1985 .

[20]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Second Language Readers' Memory for Narrative Texts: Evidence for Structure‐Preserving Top‐Down Processing , 1993 .

[21]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Integrating different types of information in text , 1980 .

[22]  M. Lundeberg,et al.  Metacognitive Aspects of Reading Comprehension: Studying Understanding in Legal Case Analysis. , 1987 .

[23]  Elizabeth B. Bernhardt,et al.  Learning and comprehension of text , 1988 .

[24]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories , 1989 .

[26]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[27]  F. Schmalhofer,et al.  Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional and situational representations , 1986 .

[28]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading , 1996 .

[29]  P. Thorndyke.  Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation‐model construction , 1996 .

[31]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  The Impact of Inferences on Instructional Text , 1990 .

[32]  Yukie Horiba.  Narrative Comprehension Processes: A Study of Native and Non-Native Readers of Japanese. , 1990 .

[33]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Discourse structure and mental models , 1985 .

[34]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[35]  S. Wineburg.  On the Reading of Historical Texts: Notes on the Breach Between School and Academy , 1991 .

[36]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[37]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing , 1990 .

[38]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[39]  Gary M. Olson,et al.  Cognitive aspects of genre , 1981 .

[40]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Conscious understanding during comprehension , 1996 .

[41]  David A. Balota.  Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .

[42]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[43]  C. Wolman.  Sensitivity to Causal Cohesion in Stories by Children with Mild Mental Retardation, Children with Learning Disabilities, and Children without Disabilities , 1991 .

[44]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Discourse comprehension : essays in honor of Walter Kintsch , 1996 .