Meet Stevie: a Socially Assistive Robot Developed Through Application of a ‘Design-Thinking’ Approach

Socially assistive service robots offer a compelling means of empowering vulnerable members of society. They can perform useful custodial functions for their users, thus reducing reliance on informal and formal caregivers. The aim of this work was to develop a prototype socially assistive robot through application of user-centered design methods, adopting an approach based on the ‘design thinking’ philosophy. Using a range of design techniques that have seldom been applied in a robotics context, a high resolution prototype was designed, fabricated and evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. Experiments were performed with four distinct user groups (including residents and care staff at a retirement community) to explore the first impressions that the robot created, its perceived usefulness, and the potential for acceptance of the platform. Overall, the robot was positively perceived by each user group, and user feedback from testing generated insights regarding the design, usability and envisioned use-cases of the technology. These findings have value in informing future iterations of robot design, as well as providing motivation for a series of future studies.

[1]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  Images of Usability , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[3]  Martin Hägele,et al.  Robotic home assistant Care-O-bot® 3 - product vision and innovation platform , 2009, 2009 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts.

[4]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and Challenges in Human–Robot Interaction , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[5]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  (Ir)relevance of Gender? on the Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Learning with a Robot , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[6]  Taezoon Park,et al.  When Stereotypes Meet Robots: The Effect of Gender Stereotypes on People's Acceptance of a Security Robot , 2013, HCI.

[7]  A. Koumpis,et al.  The perceptions of people with dementia on robot companions and their potential to reduce loneliness and isolation , 2015 .

[8]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[9]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Mental commit robot and its application to therapy of children , 2001, 2001 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8556).

[10]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[11]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges , 2013, ICSR.

[12]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  Romeo2 Project: Humanoid Robot Assistant and Companion for Everyday Life: I. Situation Assessment for Social Intelligence , 2014, AIC.

[14]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[15]  Xun Wang,et al.  Design Methodology for the UX of HRI: A Field Study of a Commercial Social Robot at an Airport , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[16]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Towards a personal robotics development platform: Rationale and design of an intrinsically safe personal robot , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  M. Hirose,et al.  Development of Humanoid Robot ASIMO , 2001 .

[18]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Robots with inflatable links , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[20]  Siddharth Sanan,et al.  Pneumatic Torsional Actuators for Inflatable Robots , 2014 .

[21]  Timothy B. Smith,et al.  Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[22]  Roger Martin The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage , 2009 .

[23]  Neerincx,et al.  "I just have diabetes": children's need for diabetes self-management support and how a social robot can accommodate their needs , 2012 .

[24]  Conor McGinn,et al.  Why Do Robots Need a Head? The Role of Social Interfaces on Service Robots , 2020, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[25]  Kazuyoshi Wada,et al.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a caregiver's manual for robot therapy using the therapeutic seal robot Paro , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[26]  Andrew Olney,et al.  Upending the Uncanny Valley , 2005, AAAI.

[27]  Håkan Eftring,et al.  What Older People Expect of Robots: A Mixed Methods Approach , 2013, ICSR.

[28]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Autonomous Soft Robotic Fish Capable of Escape Maneuvers Using Fluidic Elastomer Actuators. , 2014, Soft robotics.

[29]  Fuminori Saito,et al.  HSR, Human Support Robot as Research and Development Platform , 2015 .

[30]  Johan F.M. Molenbroek,et al.  New horizons in design for autonomous ageing , 2016, Age and ageing.

[31]  F. Eyssel,et al.  (S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots1 , 2012 .

[32]  F. Jouen,et al.  “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[33]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  A Social Service Robot in a Shopping Mall: Expectations of the Management, Retailers and Consumers , 2017, HRI.

[34]  Ross A. Knepper,et al.  Herb 2.0: Lessons Learned From Developing a Mobile Manipulator for the Home , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[35]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Living with Robots: Investigating the Habituation Effect in Participants' Preferences During a Longitudinal Human-Robot Interaction Study , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[36]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[37]  Joost van Hoof,et al.  Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[38]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[39]  A. Rigaud,et al.  Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting , 2014, Clinical interventions in aging.

[40]  Francesca Mereu,et al.  Visions Project K.1: DIY 3-D interactive videohologram device , 2014, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[41]  T. Brown,et al.  Change by Design , 2011 .

[42]  Ester Martínez-Martín,et al.  Personal Robot Assistants for Elderly Care: An Overview , 2018, Personal Assistants.

[43]  J. Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes , 2004 .

[44]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots , 2016, Nature.

[45]  R. Wood,et al.  Meshworm: A Peristaltic Soft Robot With Antagonistic Nickel Titanium Coil Actuators , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[46]  Taezoon Park,et al.  When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  Cu Pham,et al.  Integrating a Humanoid Robot into ECHONET-Based Smart Home Environments , 2017, ICSR.

[48]  Kevin Kelly,et al.  A human-oriented framework for developing assistive service robots , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[49]  M. Scherer,et al.  Assistive Technology Use and Stigma , 2004 .

[50]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction, and the Human in the Loop , 1998, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[51]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[52]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[53]  Kevin Kelly,et al.  Divergent prototyping effect on the final design solution: the role of "Dark Horse" prototype in innovation projects , 2018 .

[54]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[55]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A lightweight soft exosuit for gait assistance , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[56]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Robots And Racism , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[57]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed Questionnaire Series , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).