UPDATING THE INDICATORS OF DISASTER RISK AND RISK MANAGEMENT FOR THE AMERICAS

Disaster risk is most detailed at a micro-social or territorial scale. As we aggregate and work at more macro scales, details are lost. However, decision-making and information needs at each level are quite different, as are the social actors and stakeholders. This means that appropriate evaluation tools are necessary to make it easy to understand the problem and guide the decision-making process. It is fundamentally important to understand how vulnerability is generated, how it increases and how it accumulates. Performance benchmarks are also needed to facilitate decision makers’ access to relevant information as well as the identification and proposal of effective policies and actions. The Disaster Risk Management Indicators Program for the Americas meets this need and the results obtained for most countries of the Americas are presented. Four components or composite indicators have been designed to represent the main elements of vulnerability and show each country’s progress in managing risk. They are the ‘Disaster Deficit Index’, the ‘Local Disaster Index’, the ‘Prevalent Vulnerability Index’, and the ‘Risk Management Index’. These indicators reflect the organizational, development, capacity and institutional actions taken to reduce vulnerability and losses, to prepare for crisis and to recover efficiently from disasters. In this way, the system of indicators covers different areas of the risk problem, taking into account issues such as: potential damages and losses resulting from extreme events; recurrent disasters or losses; social and environmental conditions that make particular countries or regions more disaster prone; the capacity of the economy to recover; the operation of key services; institutional capacity and the effectiveness of basic risk management instruments (such as risk identification, prevention and mitigation measures, financial mechanisms and risk transfer); emergency response levels; and preparedness and recovery capacity. The system of indicators proposed for the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and applied to the countries of the Americas permits a systematic and quantitative benchmarking of each country during different periods between 1980 and 2008.

[1]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Version November , 2003 On the Methodological Foundations of Composite Indicators Used for Ranking Countries , 2003 .

[2]  Omar D Cardona,et al.  Disaster risk from a macroeconomic perspective: a metric for fiscal vulnerability evaluation. , 2010, Disasters.

[3]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[4]  Alejandro Horia Barbat Barbat,et al.  El riesgo sísmico y su prevención , 2000 .

[5]  Georg Ch. Pflug,et al.  Disaster Risk Management: National Systems for the Comprehensive Management of Disaster Risk and Financial Strategies for Natural Disaster Reconstruction , 2003 .

[6]  Robert Holzmann,et al.  Manejo social del riesgo: un nuevo marco conceptual para la protección social y más allá , 2003 .

[7]  M. L. Carreño,et al.  A disaster risk management performance index , 2007 .

[8]  Cardona Arboleda,et al.  Estimación holística del riesgo sísmico utilizando sistemas dinámicos complejos , 2001 .

[9]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  "Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation" (SMCE)" , 2003 .

[10]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Governance Matters Iii: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002 , 2003 .

[11]  O. Cardona,et al.  The economic and social effects of small disasters: revision of the local disaster index and the case study of Colombia , 2008 .

[12]  M. L. Carreño Técnicas innovadoras para la evaluación del riesgo sísmico y su gestión en centros urbanos: Acciones ex ante y ex post , 2006 .

[13]  Horia Alejandro Barbat Barbat,et al.  Metodología para la evaluación del desempeño de la gestión del riesgo , 2004 .

[14]  Omar D. Cardona,et al.  The Need for Rethinking the Concepts of Vulnerability and Risk from a Holistic Perspective: A Necessary Review and Criticism for Effective Risk Management , 2013 .

[15]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[16]  Omar Darío Cardona,et al.  La gestión financiera del riesgo desde la perspectiva de los desastres: evaluación de la exposición fiscal del estado y alternativas de instrumentos financieros de retención y transferencia del riesgo , 2008 .

[17]  L. R. Oldeman,et al.  World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: an explanatory note. , 1990 .

[18]  Omar D. Cardona,et al.  Earthquake Loss Assessment for Integrated Disaster Risk Management , 2008 .

[19]  Omar D. Cardona,et al.  Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Losses and the Public Economic Resilience—An Approach for a Macroeconomic Impact Evaluation , 2008 .

[20]  M. L. Carreño,et al.  Holistic Urban Seismic Risk Evaluation of Megacities: Application and Robustness , 2009 .

[21]  R. Holzmann Risk and Vulnerability: the Forward Looking of Social Protection in a Globalizing World R. Holzmann ... Risk and Vulnerability: the Forward Looking of Social Protection in a Globalizing World 2 , 2022 .

[22]  Horia Alejandro Barbat Barbat,et al.  Sistema de indicadores para la evaluación de riesgos , 2005 .

[23]  Banque Interaméricaine de Développement,et al.  Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management: Program for Latin America and the Caribbean: Summary Report , 2010 .

[24]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Prediction, Projection And Forecasting , 1990 .

[25]  Omar D. Cardona,et al.  Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management: Program for Latin America and the Caribbean: Summary Report , 2005 .

[26]  A. Barbat,et al.  Revealing the socioeconomic impact of small disasters in Colombia using the DesInventar database. , 2010, Disasters.