Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus—response compatibility effects

Extensive studies have been conducted to examine various attentional control effects that stem from stimulus— stimulus (S—S) and stimulus-response (S—R) incompatibility. Among these behavioral paradigms, the best-known are the Stroop effect, the Simon effect, and Posner’s cue validity effect. In this study, we designed two behavioral tasks incorporating these effects (Simon—color-Stroop and Simon-spatial-Stroop) guided by a general framework of S—R ensemble, the dimensional overlap theory. We analyzed various attentional effects according to dimensional overlaps among S—S and S—R ensembles and their combinations. We found that behavioral performance was independently affected by various dimensional overlaps in the Simon—color-Stroop task, whereas different sources of dimensional overlap in the Simon—spatial-Stroop task interacted with each other. We argue that the dimensional overlap theory can be extended to serve as a viable unified theory that accounts for diverse attentional effects and their interactions and helps to elucidate neural networks subserving attentional control.

[1]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional Networks , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  S Kornblum,et al.  The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M. Banich,et al.  Functional dissociation of attentional selection within PFC: response and non-response related aspects of attentional selection as ascertained by fMRI. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Jin Fan,et al.  Cognitive and Brain Consequences of Conflict , 2003, NeuroImage.

[10]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Xun Liu,et al.  Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[14]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  E. Knudsen Fundamental components of attention. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  J R Simon,et al.  Processing auditory information: interference from an irrelevant cue. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  fMRI Studies of Stroop Tasks Reveal Unique Roles of Anterior and Posterior Brain Systems in Attentional Selection , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Jin Fan,et al.  The activation of attentional networks , 2005, NeuroImage.

[19]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  The Involvement of the Inferior Parietal Cortex in the Numerical Stroop Effect and the Distance Effect in a Two-digit Number Comparison Task , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  The stroop task : the «Gold Standard» of attentional measures , 1992 .

[21]  S. Rauch,et al.  The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[22]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[23]  T. Egner Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  S. Courtney,et al.  Attention and cognitive control as emergent properties of information representation in working memory , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[25]  Thomas J. Ross,et al.  Neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom–up and top–down processes of visuospatial selective attention , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  J. Requin,et al.  The Effects of Irrelevant Stimuli: 1. The Time Course of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Consistency Effects With Stroop-Like Stimuli, Simon-Like Tasks, and Their Factorial Combinations , 1999 .

[29]  Tor D Wager,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Posner,et al.  Neural systems control of spatial orienting. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  J. Jonides,et al.  Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.