Is Fun For Wellness Engaging? Evaluation of User Experience of an Online Intervention to Promote Well-Being and Physical Activity

Online well-being interventions demonstrate great promise in terms of both engagement and outcomes. Fun For Wellness (FFW) is a novel online intervention grounded in self-efficacy theory and intended to improve multidimensional well-being and physical activity through multi-modal methods. These strategies include capability-enhancing opportunities, learning experiences such as games, video vignettes, and self-assessments. RCT studies have suggested that FFW is efficacious in improving subjective and domain-specific well-being, and effective in improving mental health, physical health, physical activity, and self-efficacy in United States. adults who are overweight and in the general population. The present study uses qualitative and quantitative user experience data collected during two RCT trials to understand and evaluate engagement with FFW, its drivers, and its outcomes. Results suggest that FFW is enjoyable, moderately engaging, and easy to use; and contributes to positive outcomes including skill development and enhanced confidence, for both overweight individuals and the general adult population. Drivers of engagement appear to include rewards, gamification, scenario-based learning, visual tracking for self-monitoring, ease of use and simple communications, and the entertaining, interactive nature of program activities. Findings indicate that there are opportunities to streamline and simplify the experience. These results can help improve FFW and contribute to the science of engagement with online interventions designed to improve well-being.

[1]  D. Meyer,et al.  Predicting engagement with an online psychosocial intervention for psychosis: Exploring individual- and intervention-level predictors , 2019, Internet interventions.

[2]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  Catherine Georgina Russell,et al.  Assessing User Engagement of an mHealth Intervention: Development and Implementation of the Growing Healthy App Engagement Index , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[4]  Deborah I Thompson,et al.  Playing for real: video games and stories for health-related behavior change. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Social Influence as a Driver of Engagement in a Web-Based Health Intervention , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  C. Gore-felton,et al.  A review of efficacious technology-based weight-loss interventions: five key components. , 2010, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[7]  R. Craig Lefebvre,et al.  The Assessment of User Engagement with eHealth Content: The eHealth Engagement Scale , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  H. D. de Heer,et al.  An Online Intervention Increases Empathy, Resilience, and Work Engagement Among Physical Therapy Students. , 2018, Journal of allied health.

[9]  Josée Poirier,et al.  Effectiveness of a multimodal online well-being intervention: a randomized controlled trial. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Measuring Engagement in eHealth and mHealth Behavior Change Interventions: Viewpoint of Methodologies , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  S. Rothmann,et al.  Positive Psychological Intervention Design and Protocols for Multi-Cultural Contexts , 2019 .

[12]  Mouaz H. Al-Mallah,et al.  A Systematic Review of Internet-Based Worksite Wellness Approaches for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management: Outcomes, Challenges & Opportunities , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  Efficacy of the Fun For Wellness Online Intervention to Promote Multidimensional Well-Being: a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2017, Prevention Science.

[14]  T. Palermo,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of an Internet-delivered family cognitive–behavioral therapy intervention for children and adolescents with chronic pain , 2009, PAIN.

[15]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Are Health Behavior Change Interventions That Use Online Social Networks Effective? A Systematic Review , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  Isabela Gasparini,et al.  A Taxonomy of Game Elements for Gamification in Educational Contexts: Proposal and Evaluation , 2019, 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).

[17]  Sheana Salyers Bull,et al.  More than just tracking time: Complex measures of user engagement with an internet-based health promotion intervention , 2016, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[18]  Hongmei Han,et al.  Efficacy of SmartLossSM, a smartphone‐based weight loss intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial , 2015, Obesity.

[19]  Jesse H. Wright,et al.  Remote Treatment Delivery in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[20]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Designing engaging online behaviour change interventions: A proposed model of user engagement , 2015 .

[21]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  Efficacy of the Fun For Wellness Online Intervention to Promote Well-Being Actions: A Secondary Data Analysis. , 2018, Games for health journal.

[22]  David Coyle,et al.  Engagement with online mental health interventions: an exploratory clinical study of a treatment for depression , 2012, CHI.

[23]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  Well‐being self‐efficacy and complier average causal effect estimation: A substantive‐methodological synergy☆ , 2017 .

[24]  S. Kelders Design for Engagement of Online Positive Psychology Interventions , 2019, Positive Psychological Intervention Design and Protocols for Multi-Cultural Contexts.

[25]  Mick P Couper,et al.  Engagement and Retention: Measuring Breadth and Depth of Participant Use of an Online Intervention , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[26]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  What makes people decide to visit and use an internet-delivered behavior-change intervention? A qualitative study among adults. , 2009 .

[27]  W. Ruch,et al.  Humor-based online positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled long-term trial , 2016 .

[28]  D. Nicholas,et al.  Evaluation of an Online Education and Support Intervention for Adolescents With Diabetes , 2012, Social work in health care.

[29]  C. Howie,et al.  Assessing treatment outcomes using a single question: the net promoter score. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[30]  Audie A Atienza,et al.  A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  Effectiveness of the fun for wellness online behavioral intervention to promote well-being and physical activity: protocol for a randomized controlled trial , 2019, BMC Public Health.

[32]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  ASSESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL WELL‐BEING: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE I COPPE SCALE , 2015 .

[33]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  Effectiveness of the Fun for Wellness Web-Based Behavioral Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Adults With Obesity (or Overweight): Randomized Controlled Trial , 2020, JMIR formative research.

[34]  J. Durlak,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Universal Mental Health Prevention Programs for Higher Education Students , 2015, Prevention Science.

[35]  J. Bauermeister,et al.  “Stay strong! keep ya head up! move on! it gets better!!!!”: resilience processes in the healthMpowerment online intervention of young black gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men , 2018, AIDS care.

[36]  Yow-jyy Joyce Lee Integrating multimodal technologies with VARK strategies for learning and teaching EFL presentation: An investigation into learners' achievements and perceptions of the learning process , 2019, Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics.

[37]  J. Seeley,et al.  A Randomized Study of Internet Parent Training Accessed From Community Technology Centers , 2015, Prevention Science.

[38]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Information Technology and Lifestyle: A Systematic Evaluation of Internet and Mobile Interventions for Improving Diet, Physical Activity, Obesity, Tobacco, and Alcohol Use , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[39]  T. V. van Tilburg,et al.  Attrition in an Online Loneliness Intervention for Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: Survival Analysis , 2019, JMIR aging.

[40]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  When Personal Tracking Becomes Social: Examining the Use of Instagram for Healthy Eating , 2017, CHI.

[41]  M. Lugo,et al.  Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview , 2013 .

[42]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of minimal guided and unguided internet-based mobile supported stress-management in employees with occupational stress: a three-armed randomised controlled trial , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[43]  Samuel Kai Wah Chu,et al.  Review of Social Media , 2020 .

[44]  M. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz,et al.  Attrition and adherence in smartphone-delivered interventions for mental health problems: A systematic and meta-analytic review. , 2019, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[45]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. , 2009, Annual review of public health.

[46]  Lena M. Neumeier,et al.  Delivering your daily dose of well-being to the workplace: a randomized controlled trial of an online well-being programme for employees , 2017 .

[47]  David M Williams,et al.  Future directions in physical activity intervention research: expanding our focus to sedentary behaviors, technology, and dissemination , 2017, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[48]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Website-delivered physical activity interventions a review of the literature. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[49]  C. Sciamanna,et al.  Chronic health conditions and internet behavioral interventions: a review of factors to enhance user engagement. , 2011, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[50]  Stoyan R. Stoyanov,et al.  Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature , 2016, Internet interventions.

[51]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis , 2016, Translational behavioral medicine.

[52]  Cecily Morrison,et al.  Analyzing Engagement in a Web-Based Intervention Platform Through Visualizing Log-Data , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[53]  J. Astin,et al.  Mindfulness Goes to Work: Impact of an Online Workplace Intervention , 2014, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[54]  N. Durant,et al.  Internet-Based Physical Activity Interventions , 2014, American journal of lifestyle medicine.

[55]  Steven H. Jones,et al.  Online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives’ Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) , 2019 .

[56]  G. Parker,et al.  The Ins and Outs of an Online Bipolar Education Program: A Study of Program Attrition , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[57]  Tommy Chou,et al.  Multimedia Field Test: Evaluating the Creative Ambitions of SuperBetter and Its Quest to Gamify Mental Health , 2017 .

[58]  Azy Barak,et al.  Current and Future Trends in Internet-Supported Mental Health Interventions , 2011 .

[59]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  Effectiveness of the Fun For Wellness Online Behavioral Intervention to Promote Subjective Well-Being in Adults with Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2020, Journal of Happiness Studies.

[60]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  An Exploration of the Effectiveness of the Fun For Wellness Online Intervention to Promote Health in Adults With Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2020 .

[61]  Lindsay E. Young,et al.  A review of social media analytic tools and their applications to evaluate activity and engagement in online sexual health interventions , 2020, Preventive medicine reports.

[62]  Vijay N. Nair,et al.  The Effect of Program Design on Engagement With an Internet-Based Smoking Intervention: Randomized Factorial Trial , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[63]  T. Vanhala,et al.  Mobile Mental Wellness Training for Stress Management: Feasibility and Design Implications Based on a One-Month Field Study , 2013, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[64]  Shlomo Berkovsky,et al.  Features Predicting Weight Loss in Overweight or Obese Participants in a Web-Based Intervention: Randomized Trial , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[65]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Online intervention engagement predicts smoking cessation. , 2012, Preventive medicine.