Cardiac pacemaker: in vitro assessment at 1.5 T.

BACKGROUND In vitro testing is used to determine safe parameters before performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on a patient with an implant. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate a cardiac pacemaker using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) system. METHODS A modern cardiac pacemaker (INSIGNIA I PLUS, Model 1298, and FINELINE II, Model 4471, pacing leads; Guidant Corporation, St Paul, MN) was evaluated for magnetic field interactions at 1.5 T. Magnetic resonance imaging-related heating was assessed using 3 different 1.5-T scanners operating at various levels of radio-frequency power and imaging conditions. Functional aspects of the pacemaker were evaluated immediately before and after MRI (9 different pulse sequences). Artifacts were also characterized. RESULTS Magnetic field interactions for the pacemaker were minor. Temperature changes measured in vitro were at levels that are not expected to pose a risk for specific MR conditions (< 4.0 degrees C). The function of the pacemaker was unaffected by MRI. Artifacts were minor for the leads and relatively large for the implantable pulse generator. CONCLUSION The findings indicated that this pacemaker exhibited acceptable safety features relative to the use of a 1.5-T MR system. If induced currents do not occur for this device, it may be safe for a patient to undergo MRI by following specific conditions. The results are specific to the pacemaker tested, the MR systems, and conditions used in this evaluation.

[1]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Pacing in magnetic resonance imaging environment: clinical and technical considerations on compatibility. , 2001, European heart journal.

[2]  P Boesiger,et al.  Force and Torque Effects of a 1.5‐Tesla MRI Scanner on Cardiac Pacemakers and ICDs , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  K. Seelos,et al.  Effects of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Cardiac Pacemakers , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  D. Haines,et al.  Cellular Electrophysiological Effects of Hyperthermia on Isolated Guinea Pig Papillary Muscle Implications for Catheter Ablation , 1993, Circulation.

[5]  Ashwini Sharan,et al.  Neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation: In vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging–related heating at 1.5 tesla , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  M. Ezri,et al.  Case report: nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with a pacemaker. , 1993, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[7]  J Gieseke,et al.  MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. , 2000, Radiology.

[8]  T. W. Athey,et al.  Heating Near Implanted Medical Devices by the MRI RF-magnetic Field , 1999, IEEE International Magnetics Conference.

[9]  P. Alagona,et al.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Patient with a DDD Pacemaker , 1989, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Neurostimulation system used for deep brain stimulation (DBS): MR safety issues and implications of failing to follow safety recommendations. , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, European heart journal.

[12]  Robert Fair,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  J. Loewy,et al.  Reconsideration of pacemakers and MR imaging. , 2004, Radiographics.

[14]  E Kanal,et al.  Aneurysm clips: evaluation of MR imaging artifacts at 1.5 T. , 1998, Radiology.

[15]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Cardiac pacemakers, ICDs, and loop recorder: evaluation of translational attraction using conventional ("long-bore") and "short-bore" 1.5- and 3.0-Tesla MR systems. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[16]  B Lüderitz,et al.  Interference with Cardiac Pacemakers by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Are There Irreversible Changes at 0.5 Tesla? , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  Henry R. Halperin,et al.  Modern Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Systems Can Be Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe: In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Safety and Function at 1.5 T , 2004, Circulation.

[18]  F G Shellock,et al.  Implantable spinal fusion stimulator: Assessment of MR safety and artifacts , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  E S Hochmair,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cochlear implants: Compatibility and safety aspects , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimeter of MRI‐related implant heating , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.