Expressions of Dissent in Email

This study explores the role of email in organizational dissent expression and employees’ perceptions of the rules for using this medium. Twenty-one interviews were conducted with employees who commonly used email in their job to learn about some of the ways email was seen as playing a role in organizational dissent by those who commonly use the technology. Thematic analysis of data produced two rules employees cited for email usage: be careful what is committed to writing (because of loss of message control and fear of being monitored) and maintain an appropriate, professional communication style (free of emotion, sent only to the appropriate people, and used for topics not needing face-to-face interaction). Three additional strategic roles of email in organizational dissent include emails as a means of promoting strategic self-presentation; email as a means of inviting dissent; and email as a means of documenting/archiving potentially problematic interactions. The implications of this study for existing and future studies of dissent are explored.

[1]  G. McDonough.  Why dissent is a vital concept in moral education , 2010 .

[2]  Jeffrey W. Kassing,et al.  Someone’s Going to Hear about This , 2002 .

[3]  Jeffrey W. Kassing.  Exploring the relationship between workplace freedom of speech, organizational identification, and employee dissent , 2000 .

[4]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[5]  Jeffrey W. Kassing.  Development and Validation of the Organizational Dissent Scale , 1998 .

[6]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way , 1980 .

[7]  Jeffrey W. Kassing.  Speaking Up Competently: A Comparison of Perceived Competence in Upward Dissent Strategies , 2005 .

[8]  E. Schegloff.  Sequencing in Conversational Openings , 1968 .

[9]  Jeffrey W. Kassing.  Investigating the relationship between superior‐subordinate relationship quality and employee dissent , 2000 .

[10]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Schmooze or Lose: Social Friction and Lubrication in E-Mail Negotiations , 2000 .

[11]  Jeffrey W. Kassing,et al.  Examining the Relationship between Organizational Dissent and Aggressive Communication , 1999 .

[12]  W. Owen.  Interpretive themes in relational communication , 1984 .

[13]  Jason J. Dahling,et al.  Breaking rules for the right reasons? An investigation of pro-social rule breaking , 2012 .

[14]  Kris Byron.  Carrying too Heavy a Load? The Communication and Miscommunication of Emotion by Email , 2008 .

[15]  H. Payne.  The Role of Organization-Based Self-Esteem in Employee Dissent Expression , 2007 .

[16]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[17]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  Conflict Escalation: Dispute Exacerbating Elements of E-mail Communication , 2003 .

[18]  L. V. Dyne,et al.  Predicting voice behavior in work groups. , 1998 .

[19]  Johny T. Garner.  When Things Go Wrong at Work: An Exploration of Organizational Dissent Messages , 2009 .

[20]  Susan B. Shimanoff.  Communication Rules: Theory and Research , 1980 .

[21]  Mounia Bennani-Chraïbi.  Exit, voice, loyalty , 2009, Dictionnaire des mouvements sociaux.

[22]  Vincent R. Waldron,et al.  Communication Practices of Followers, Members, and Protégés: The Case of Upward Influence Tactics , 1999 .

[23]  R. Hart,et al.  Rhetorical sensitivity and social interaction , 1972 .

[24]  Chulmo Koo,et al.  Examination of how social aspects moderate the relationship between task characteristics and usage of social communication technologies (SCTs) in organizations , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[25]  Jeffrey W. Kassing,et al.  Examining the association of job tenure, employment history, and organizational status with employee dissent , 2001 .

[26]  J. Sprague,et al.  Boat-Rocking in the High-Technology Culture , 1988 .

[27]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Computers, Networks and Work. , 1991 .

[28]  Vernon E. Cronen,et al.  A rules‐based model for the analysis and evaluation of organizational communication , 1979 .

[29]  Karianne Skovholt,et al.  Email Copies in Workplace Interaction , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  Organizational Dissent as a Function of Organizational Justice , 2008 .

[31]  Stephen Fineman,et al.  Emotion and organizing , 2006 .

[32]  L. V. Dyne,et al.  Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs , 2003 .

[33]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[34]  Leon Adam Watts,et al.  In Search of Coherence: A Review of E-Mail Research , 2005, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[35]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[36]  Yunxia Zhu,et al.  Practitioners’ Views About the Use of Business Email Within Organizational Settings: Implications for Developing Student Generic Competence , 2009 .

[37]  Roger J. Volkema,et al.  Getting Off on the Right Foot: The Effects of Initial Email Messages on Negotiation Process and Outcome , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[38]  W. C. Redding,et al.  Rocking boats, blowing whistles, and teaching speech communication , 1985 .

[39]  Donald P. Cushman.  The rules perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication , 1977 .

[40]  Scott C. D'Urso,et al.  Who’s Watching Us at Work? Toward a Structural–Perceptual Model of Electronic Monitoring and Surveillance in Organizations , 2006 .

[41]  Jason L. Snyder.  E-Mail Privacy in the Workplace , 2010 .

[42]  J. W. Graham,et al.  Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. , 1986 .

[43]  Jeffrey W. Kassing.  Consider This: A Comparison of Factors Contributing to Employees' Expressions of Dissent , 2008 .

[44]  L. Jabs.  Communicative Rules and Organizational Decision Making , 2005 .

[45]  Michael Haugh.  When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness , 2010 .

[46]  Sam H. Dekay.  Designing Email Messages for Corporate Readers: a Case Study of Effective and Ineffective Rhetorical Strategies At a Fortune 100 Company , 2010 .

[47]  R. Hopper,et al.  Symbolic action as alignment: A synthesis of rules approaches , 1987 .

[48]  Jeffrey W. Kassing,et al.  Testing a workplace experience explanation of displaced dissent , 2004 .

[49]  Giuseppe Mantovani,et al.  Is Computer-Mediated Communication Intrinsically Apt to Enhance Democracy in Organizations? , 1994 .

[50]  Donal Carbaugh.  Communication rules in Donahue discourse , 1987 .

[51]  Jeffrey W. Kassing.  Articulating, antagonizing, and displacing: A model of employee dissent , 1997 .

[52]  Jeanette W. Gilsdorf,et al.  Organizational Rules on Communicating: How Employees Are - and Are Not- Learning the Ropes , 1998 .

[53]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sensemaking and Emotions in Organizations: Accounting for Emotions in a Rational(ized) Context , 2006 .

[54]  Jeffrey W. Kassing.  Stressing Out about Dissent: Examining the Relationship Between Coping Strategies and Dissent Expression , 2011 .

[55]  Jeffrey W. Kassing,et al.  Dissension in the organization as it relates to control expectancies , 2001 .

[56]  B. van den Hooff,et al.  Situational Influences on the Use of Communication Technologies , 2005 .

[57]  Michael W. Kramer,et al.  Communication Rules for the Display of Emotions in Organizational Settings , 2002 .