Neptune Odyssey: A Flagship Concept for the Exploration of the Neptune–Triton System

The Neptune Odyssey mission concept is a Flagship-class orbiter and atmospheric probe to the Neptune–Triton system. This bold mission of exploration would orbit an ice-giant planet to study the planet, its rings, small satellites, space environment, and the planet-sized moon Triton. Triton is a captured dwarf planet from the Kuiper Belt, twin of Pluto, and likely ocean world. Odyssey addresses Neptune system-level science, with equal priorities placed on Neptune, its rings, moons, space environment, and Triton. Between Uranus and Neptune, the latter is unique in providing simultaneous access to both an ice giant and a Kuiper Belt dwarf planet. The spacecraft—in a class equivalent to the NASA/ESA/ASI Cassini spacecraft—would launch by 2031 on a Space Launch System or equivalent launch vehicle and utilize a Jupiter gravity assist for a 12 yr cruise to Neptune and a 4 yr prime orbital mission; alternatively a launch after 2031 would have a 16 yr direct-to-Neptune cruise phase. Our solution provides annual launch opportunities and allows for an easy upgrade to the shorter (12 yr) cruise. Odyssey would orbit Neptune retrograde (prograde with respect to Triton), using the moon's gravity to shape the orbital tour and allow coverage of Triton, Neptune, and the space environment. The atmospheric entry probe would descend in ∼37 minutes to the 10 bar pressure level in Neptune's atmosphere just before Odyssey's orbit-insertion engine burn. Odyssey's mission would end by conducting a Cassini-like “Grand Finale,” passing inside the rings and ultimately taking a final great plunge into Neptune's atmosphere.

[1]  R. Subramanian Shaping Science: Organizations, Decisions, and Culture on NASA's Teams by Janet Vertesi (review) , 2022, Technology and culture.

[2]  A. McEwen,et al.  Ocean Worlds: Science Goals for the Next Decade , 2021 .

[3]  J. Cooper,et al.  Comparative Planetology of Kuiper Belt Dwarf Planets Enabled by the Near-Term Interstellar Probe , 2021 .

[4]  F. Postberg,et al.  Ice Giants — The Return of the Rings , 2021 .

[5]  Giada Arney,et al.  Looking Back is Looking Forward: The Need for Retrospective Solar System Observations in Advance of Exoplanet Retrievals , 2021 .

[6]  I. Cohen,et al.  The Importance of Exploring Neptune’s Aurora and Ionosphere , 2021 .

[7]  M. Marley,et al.  Synergy between Ice Giant and Exoplanet Exploration: The Solar System’s Planets “As Exoplanets” , 2021 .

[8]  C. Hansen,et al.  Triton: Fascinating Moon, Likely Ocean World, Compelling Destination! , 2021, Bulletin of the AAS.

[9]  T. Guillot,et al.  Keys of a Mission to Uranus or Neptune, the Closest Ice Giants , 2020, Bulletin of the AAS.

[10]  L. Lamy Auroral emissions from Uranus and Neptune , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[11]  P. Irwin,et al.  Neptune and Uranus: ice or rock giants? , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[12]  K. Runyon,et al.  Neptune Odyssey: Mission to the Neptune-Triton System , 2020 .

[13]  H. Hammel,et al.  Ice Giant Atmospheric Science , 2020, 2010.08617.

[14]  M. W. Evans,et al.  Frontiers in Planetary Rings Science , 2020, 2008.12418.

[15]  F. Soubiran,et al.  Constraining the depth of the winds on Uranus and Neptune via Ohmic dissipation , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[16]  J. Lunine,et al.  Tracing the Origins of the Ice Giants Through Noble Gas Isotopic Composition , 2020, Space Science Reviews.

[17]  S. Kane,et al.  Exoplanets in our Backyard: A report from an interdisciplinary community workshop and a call to combined action , 2020, 2007.09231.

[18]  B. Mauk,et al.  Magnetospheric Studies: A Requirement for Addressing Interdisciplinary Mysteries in the Ice Giant Systems , 2020, Bulletin of the AAS.

[19]  D. Stevenson Jupiter's Interior as Revealed by Juno , 2020, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences.

[20]  C. Mankovich Saturn's Rings as a Seismograph to Probe Saturn's Internal Structure , 2020, AGU Advances.

[21]  University of Arizona,et al.  Exploration Strategy for the Outer Planets 2023-2032: Goals and Priorities , 2020 .

[22]  J. H. In,et al.  Deep Atmosphere Composition, Structure, Origin, and Exploration, with Particular Focus on Critical in situ Science at the Icy Giants , 2020, Space Science Reviews.

[23]  M. Dougherty,et al.  The landscape of Saturn’s internal magnetic field from the Cassini Grand Finale , 2019, Icarus.

[24]  G. Orton,et al.  Ice Giant Circulation Patterns: Implications for Atmospheric Probes , 2019, Space Science Reviews.

[25]  R. Hueso,et al.  Atmospheric Dynamics and Vertical Structure of Uranus and Neptune’s Weather Layers , 2019, Space Science Reviews.

[26]  Marius Millot,et al.  Nanosecond X-ray diffraction of shock-compressed superionic water ice , 2019, Nature.

[27]  Sona Hosseini,et al.  The NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds , 2018, Astrobiology.

[28]  M. Showalter,et al.  A new inner moon of Neptune , 2018, Nature.

[29]  Thomas A. Burk,et al.  Saturn’s magnetic field revealed by the Cassini Grand Finale , 2018, Science.

[30]  G. Orton,et al.  Seasonal Stratospheric Photochemistry on Uranus and Neptune. , 2018, Icarus.

[31]  A. Hayes,et al.  Exposure age of Saturn's A and B rings, and the Cassini Division as suggested by their non-icy material content , 2017 .

[32]  R. Canup,et al.  Triton's Evolution with a Primordial Neptunian Satellite System , 2017, The Astronomical journal.

[33]  D. Reuter,et al.  Geology before Pluto: Pre-encounter considerations , 2014 .

[34]  Javier Ruiz,et al.  Neptune and Triton: Essential pieces of the Solar System puzzle , 2014 .

[35]  F. Nimmo,et al.  Powering Triton's recent geological activity by obliquity tides: Implications for Pluto geology , 2014 .

[36]  G. Glatzmaier,et al.  Tidal heating in icy satellite oceans , 2014 .

[37]  William B. Hubbard,et al.  Atmospheric confinement of jet streams on Uranus and Neptune , 2013, Nature.

[38]  James Roberts,et al.  Sustainability of a subsurface ocean within Triton's interior , 2012 .

[39]  G. Schubert,et al.  Planetary magnetic fields: Observations and models , 2011 .

[40]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Collaboration in Metagenomics: Sequence Databases and the Organization of Scientific Work , 2009, ECSCW.

[41]  Daniel B. Horn,et al.  Enabling Remote Participation in Research , 2008 .

[42]  K. Zahnle,et al.  On the negligible surface age of Triton , 2007 .

[43]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure , 2006, CSCW '06.

[44]  M. Showalter,et al.  The dynamic neptunian ring arcs: evidence for a gradual disappearance of Liberté and resonant jump of courage , 2005 .

[45]  J. Burns,et al.  Discovery of five irregular moons of Neptune , 2004, Nature.

[46]  Charlotte Linde,et al.  Narrative and social tacit knowledge , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[47]  C. Porco,et al.  Collisional Simulations of Neptune's Ring Arcs , 1997 .

[48]  B. Sicardy,et al.  The Dynamics of the Neptunian Adams Ring's Arcs , 1996 .

[49]  R. Holme,et al.  The magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune: Methods and models , 1996 .

[50]  Jack J. Lissauer,et al.  Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas , 1995 .

[51]  R. H. Brown,et al.  Triton's Global Heat Budget , 1991, Science.

[52]  S. K. Croft,et al.  Voyager 2 at Neptune: Imaging Science Results , 1989, Science.

[53]  D. Banfield,et al.  Neptune's Story , 1989, Science.

[54]  Robert S. Harrington,et al.  The satellites of Neptune and the origin of Pluto , 1979 .