Economics of a coordinated biorefinery feedstock harvest system: lignocellulosic biomass harvest cost

Abstract A potential advantage of lignocellulosic biomass gasification–fermentation technology is that a variety of feedstocks, including agricultural residues, native grasses, introduced perennials, and dedicated energy crops may be gasified by the same facility. Since harvest windows differ across species, gasification–fermentation technology would enable the use of specialized harvest and collection machinery throughout many months and reduce the fixed costs of harvest machinery per unit of feedstock. This study was conducted to determine the cost to harvest lignocellulosic biomass for use as biorefinery feedstock, and to determine the potential economies of size that might result from a coordinated structure. An agricultural machinery cost computer program was used to determine which specific type of machines would result in the lowest costs at intensive levels of use. A machinery complement estimator was used to design a coordinated set of machines and estimate costs for owning and operating the machines. The designed coordinated harvest unit includes ten laborers, nine tractors, three mowers, three rakes, three balers, and one bale transporter. The cost for mowing, raking, baling, gathering, and stacking in-field was estimated to be from $11.26 to $14.01 Mg −1 depending upon biomass yield. A biorefinery with an annual feedstock requirement of 910 Gg yr −1 would require approximately 18 harvest units and an average machinery investment of $11 million. Additional research is necessary to determine the cost to procure material from the landowner, the cost to store, storage losses, and the cost to transport feedstock from in-field stacks to a biorefinery.

[1]  R. Olsson,et al.  Harvest of grass for combustion in late summer and in spring , 1997 .

[2]  L. Lynd,et al.  Fuel Ethanol from Cellulosic Biomass , 1991, Science.

[3]  D. O. Hall,et al.  Will biomass be the environmentally friendly fuel of the future , 1998 .

[4]  Randy S. Lewis,et al.  Formation of ethanol from carbon monoxide via a new microbial catalyst , 2002 .

[5]  D. I. Wang,et al.  Ethanol from cellulosic biomass , 1983 .

[6]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  SHAM—a simulation model for designing straw fuel delivery systems. Part 1: model description , 1999 .

[7]  P. Gallagher,et al.  Some New Ethanol Technology: Cost Competition and Adoption Effects in the Petroleum Market , 1999 .

[8]  Charles E. Wyman,et al.  Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology, economics, and opportunities , 1994 .

[9]  Burton C. English,et al.  The Economic Feasibility of Crop Residues as Auxiliary Fuel in Coal-Fired Power Plants , 1981 .

[10]  Batavia Mk,et al.  Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. , 1991 .

[11]  Dennis R. Keeney,et al.  Biomass as an energy source for the midwestern U.S. , 1992 .

[12]  Francis M. Epplin,et al.  Cost to produce and deliver switchgrass biomass to an ethanol-conversion facility in the southern plains of the United States , 1996 .

[13]  Herman R.J. Vollebergh,et al.  Environmental externalities and social optimality in biomass markets: waste-to-energy in The Netherlands and biofuels in France , 1997 .

[14]  Andrew R. Gillespie,et al.  Assessing plantation biomass for co-firing with coal in northern Indiana: A linear programming approach , 2000 .

[15]  D. Glassner,et al.  CORN STOVER COLLECTION PROJECT , 1998 .

[16]  Youn-Sang Choi,et al.  Economic feasibility of producing ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks , 2000 .

[17]  Marie E. Walsh,et al.  U.S. bioenergy crop economic analyses: status and needs. , 1998 .

[18]  K. Kadam,et al.  Rice straw as a lignocellulosic resource: collection, processing, transportation, and environmental aspects , 2000 .