Genomic‐Enabled Prediction Based on Molecular Markers and Pedigree Using the Bayesian Linear Regression Package in R

The availability of dense molecular markers has made possible the use of genomic selection in plant and animal breeding. However, models for genomic selection pose several computational and statistical challenges and require specialized computer programs, not always available to the end user and not implemented in standard statistical software yet. The R‐package BLR (Bayesian Linear Regression) implements several statistical procedures (e.g., Bayesian Ridge Regression, Bayesian LASSO) in a unified framework that allows including marker genotypes and pedigree data jointly. This article describes the classes of models implemented in the BLR package and illustrates their use through examples. Some challenges faced when applying genomic‐enabled selection, such as model choice, evaluation of predictive ability through cross‐validation, and choice of hyper‐parameters, are also addressed.

[1]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. , 2010, Briefings in functional genomics.

[2]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[3]  R. Metzenberg Genetic regulatory systems in Neurospora. , 1972, Annual review of genetics.

[4]  M. Goddard,et al.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[7]  José Crossa,et al.  Predicting Quantitative Traits With Regression Models for Dense Molecular Markers and Pedigree , 2009, Genetics.

[8]  C. R. Henderson,et al.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. , 1975, Biometrics.

[9]  L. Penrose,et al.  THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RELATIVES ON THE SUPPOSITION OF MENDELIAN INHERITANCE , 2022 .

[10]  A. Templeton Systems of Mating , 2006, Population Genetics and Microevolutionary Theory.

[11]  José Crossa,et al.  Prediction of Genetic Values of Quantitative Traits in Plant Breeding Using Pedigree and Molecular Markers , 2010, Genetics.

[12]  R. Bernardo,et al.  Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize , 2007 .

[13]  M. Goddard,et al.  Genomic selection. , 2007, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[14]  Richard M Bruskiewich,et al.  The International Rice Information System. A Platform for Meta-Analysis of Rice Crop Data , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[15]  C. Vernesi,et al.  Characterization of the rabbit agouti signaling protein (ASIP) gene: transcripts and phylogenetic analyses and identification of the causative mutation of the nonagouti black coat colour. , 2010, Genomics.

[16]  R. Fernando,et al.  The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values , 2007, Genetics.

[17]  S. Wright,et al.  Systems of Mating. I. the Biometric Relations between Parent and Offspring. , 1921, Genetics.

[18]  Daniel Gianola,et al.  Additive Genetic Variability and the Bayesian Alphabet , 2009, Genetics.

[19]  N. Yi,et al.  Bayesian LASSO for Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping , 2008, Genetics.

[20]  B. J. Hayes,et al.  Genomic selection: Genomic selection , 2007 .

[21]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[22]  R. Fisher XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[23]  G. Casella,et al.  The Bayesian Lasso , 2008 .

[24]  D Gianola,et al.  Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.