Using a simulated environment to investigate experiences reported during space travel

Astronauts report certain experiences that can be classified as awe and wonder when looking out of their space station or shuttle portals at two different stimuli: the earth and deep space. Based on these reports, it was of interest to further investigate those types of experiences by using a mixed-reality environment resembling an International Space Station workstation designed to expose subjects to simulated stimuli of the earth and deep space. The study is multidisciplinary, involving simulation construction, physiological assessment, psychological testing, textual analysis, and phenomenological interviews. The goal was to induce in the average person the experiences and responses of the astronauts. Preliminary results show promise for using a virtual/mixed-reality environment in a laboratory when assessing cognitive/affective experiences, such as awe and wonder, found in a real-world context.

[1]  Lauren Reinerman-Jones,et al.  Methodological lessons in neurophenomenology: Review of a baseline study and recommendations for research approaches , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  F. Varela,et al.  Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[4]  A. Tellegen,et al.  Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. , 1974, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  Lauren Reinerman-Jones,et al.  Neurophenomenology: an integrated approach to exploring awe and wonder1 , 2013 .

[6]  Antoine Lutz,et al.  Toward a neurophenomenology as an account of generative passages: a first empirical case study , 2002 .

[7]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[8]  C. Fellbaum An Electronic Lexical Database , 1998 .

[9]  F. Varela,et al.  NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem , 1996 .

[10]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[11]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[12]  S. Gallagher,et al.  Experimenting with phenomenology , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[13]  Khader M Hasan,et al.  Orbital and intracranial effects of microgravity: findings at 3-T MR imaging. , 2012, Radiology.

[14]  David L. McLain,et al.  The Mstat-I: A New Measure of an Individual'S Tolerance for Ambiguity , 1993 .

[15]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[16]  Claire Petitmengin,et al.  Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness , 2006 .

[17]  Ann,et al.  Truth and method , 1994, Journal of Religion and Health.

[18]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[19]  Larry A Kramer,et al.  Optic disc edema, globe flattening, choroidal folds, and hyperopic shifts observed in astronauts after long-duration space flight. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[20]  Kate B. Carey,et al.  Psychometric Examination of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality Among College Students , 2009 .