The impact of speeding on data quality in nonprobability and freshly recruited probability‐based online panels

[1]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Research Synthesis AAPOR Report on Online Panels , 2010 .

[2]  M. Galesic,et al.  Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey , 2009 .

[3]  Vera Toepoel,et al.  Effects of Design in Web Surveys Comparing Trained and Fresh Respondents , 2008 .

[4]  R. Ratcliff Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  RESPONSE LATENCY AS A SIGNAL TO QUESTION PROBLEMS IN SURVEY RESEARCH , 1996 .

[6]  R. Montjoy,et al.  Overreporting voting: why it happens and why it matters. , 2001, Public opinion quarterly.

[7]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys , 2014 .

[8]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  The Impact of "No Opinion" Response Options on Data Quality: Non-Attitude Reduction or an Invitation to Satisfice? , 2001 .

[9]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  EDUCATION MODERATES SOME RESPONSE EFFECTS IN ATTITUDE MEASUREMENT , 1996 .

[10]  Dirk Heerwegh,et al.  Explaining Response Latencies and Changing Answers Using Client-Side Paradata from a Web Survey , 2003 .

[11]  F. Conrad,et al.  Spacing, Position, and Order Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions , 2004 .

[12]  Olena Kaminska,et al.  Satisficing Among Reluctant Respondents in a Cross-National Context , 2010 .

[13]  J. Krosnick Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[14]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Fast times and easy questions: the effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times , 2008 .

[15]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  Response-time measurement in survey research: A method for CATI and a new look at nonattitudes. , 1991 .

[16]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Attitude Measurement: A Cognitive Perspective , 1987 .

[17]  Paul R. Abramson,et al.  Who Overreports Voting? , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[18]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[19]  Mario Callegaro,et al.  Response Latency as an Indicator of Optimizing in Online Questionnaires , 2009 .

[20]  A. Meade,et al.  Identifying careless responses in survey data. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[21]  W. Dijkstra,et al.  Response latencies and (para)linguistic expressions as indicators of response error , 2004 .

[22]  S. Hansen Participation, Political Structure, and Concurrence , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[23]  J. Krosnick,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF A COGNITIVE THEORY OF RESPONSE-ORDER EFFECTS IN SURVEY MEASUREMENT , 1987 .

[24]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  RESPONSE LATENCY VERSUS CERTAINTY AS INDEXES OF THE STRENGTH OF VOTING INTENTIONS IN A CATI SURVEY , 1993 .

[25]  Mick P. Couper,et al.  Technology Trends in Survey Data Collection , 2005 .

[26]  Harald Schoen,et al.  Putting a questionnaire on the web is not enough- a comparison of online and offline surveys conducted in the context of the German federal election 2002 , 2006 .

[27]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Survey research and societal change. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  Martin Johnson,et al.  Timepieces: Components of Survey Question Response Latencies , 2004 .

[29]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidence , 1996 .

[30]  Neil Malhotra,et al.  Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys , 2008 .

[31]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Comparing Oral Interviewing with Self-Administered Computerized QuestionnairesAn Experiment , 2010 .

[32]  Mick P. Couper,et al.  Usability Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Survey Instruments , 2000 .