High-Accuracy Elevation Data at Large Scales from Airborne Single-Pass SAR Interferometry

Digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential data sets for disaster risk management and humanitarian relief services as well as many environmental process models. At present, on the hand, globally available DEMs only meet the basic requirements and for many services and modeling studies are not of high enough spatial resolution and lack accuracy in the vertical. On the other hand, LiDAR-DEMs are of very high spatial resolution and great vertical accuracy but acquisition operations can be very costly for spatial scales larger than a couple of hundred square km and also have severe limitations in wetland areas and under cloudy and rainy conditions. The ideal situation would thus be to have a DEM technology that allows larger spatial coverage than LiDAR but without compromising resolution and vertical accuracy and still performing under some adverse weather conditions and at a reasonable cost. In this paper, we present a novel single pass In-SAR technology for airborne vehicles that is cost-effective and can generate DEMs with a vertical error of around 0.3 m for an average spatial resolution of 3 m. To demonstrate this capability, we compare a sample single-pass In-SAR Ka-band DEM of the California Central Valley from the NASA/JPL airborne GLISTIN-A to a high-resolution LiDAR DEM. We also perform a simple sensitivity analysis to floodplain inundation. Based on the findings of our analysis, we argue that this type of technology can and should be used to replace large regions of globally available lower resolution DEMs, particularly in coastal, delta and floodplain areas where a high number of assets, habitats and lives are at risk from natural disasters. We conclude with a discussion on requirements, advantages and caveats in terms of instrument and data processing.

[1]  E. Rodríguez,et al.  Theory and design of interferometric synthetic aperture radars , 1992 .

[2]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[3]  P. Bates,et al.  A first large‐scale flood inundation forecasting model , 2013 .

[4]  David M. Cobby,et al.  Two‐dimensional hydraulic flood modelling using a finite‐element mesh decomposed according to vegetation and topographic features derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry , 2003 .

[5]  D. Mason,et al.  Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modelling , 2001 .

[6]  E.E. Pissaloux,et al.  Image Processing , 1994, Proceedings. Second Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing.

[7]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  SRTM vegetation removal and hydrodynamic modeling accuracy , 2013 .

[8]  S. Kanae,et al.  A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model , 2011 .

[9]  Delwyn Moller,et al.  The Glacier and Land Ice Surface Topography Interferometer: An Airborne Proof-of-Concept Demonstration of High-Precision Ka-Band Single-Pass Elevation Mapping , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  M. Crawford The Human Genome Project. , 1990, Human biology.

[11]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Technology: Fight floods on a global scale , 2014, Nature.

[12]  B. Sanders Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling , 2007 .

[13]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  The Use of Radar Imagery in Riverine Flood Inundation Studies , 2012 .

[14]  R. Nicholls,et al.  Future flood losses in major coastal cities , 2013 .

[15]  P. Bates,et al.  A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas , 2012 .

[16]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Remote sensing and flood inundation modelling , 2004 .

[17]  P. Bates Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: how far have we got? , 2012 .

[18]  Fuk K. Li,et al.  Synthetic aperture radar interferometry , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.