Interactions of Staphylococcus aureus with ultrasoft hydrogel biomaterials.

Ultrasoft biomaterials-polymers, gels, and human soft tissues with an elastic modulus less than ∼100 kPa-are increasingly used in medical devices. While bacterial interactions (adhesion and biofilm formation) have been extensively studied on stiffer materials, little is known about how bacteria colonize ultrasoft materials as a nidus for infection. The goal of this work was to determine how material properties of ultrasoft hydrogels used for dermal fillers might affect pathogenesis of associated infections. We first synthesized a range of polyacrylamide hydrogels (PAAm) with moduli similar to clinically used dermal fillers and characterized the rheological, morphological and porous properties. We then developed a novel microfabricated insert to contain the PAAm in a flow system for quantification of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. The rate of adhesion and numbers of adherent Staphylococcus aureus on the surface of PAAm both decreased as the modulus increased. Adhesion was reduced by 3 logs (from 93 × 10(4)/cm(2) to 0.083 × 10(4)/cm(2)) with increasing modulus (from 17 Pa to 654 Pa). However, the number of bacteria in the bulk was the highest within the stiffest gels. This trend was further amplified in subsequent biofilm studies, where interfacial coverage of biofilm decreased as the modulus increased, while the fraction of biofilm in the bulk was the highest within the stiffest gel. The results show significant differences in bacterial colonization of PAAm based on material properties, and reveal how the injection process may unexpectedly create discontinuities that provide a microenvironmental niche for bacterial colonization.

[1]  Young Ha Kim,et al.  The effect of gelatin incorporation into electrospun poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) fibers on mechanical properties and cytocompatibility. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[2]  M. Fletcher,et al.  Bacterial adhesion : mechanisms and physiological significance , 1985 .

[3]  H. Gladstone,et al.  Adverse effects when injecting facial fillers. , 2007, Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[4]  A. Metters,et al.  Hydrogels in controlled release formulations: network design and mathematical modeling. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[5]  S. Affatato Wear of orthopaedic implants and artificial joints , 2012 .

[6]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Conditions of lateral surface confinement that promote tissue-cell integration and inhibit biofilm growth. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[7]  J. Andrade,et al.  Interfacial tensions at acrylic hydrogel-water interfaces , 1985 .

[8]  C. B. Smith,et al.  In Vitro Activity of Tobramycin and Gentamicin , 1972, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  van der Henny C. Mei Microbial Adhesion in Flow Displacement Systems , 2006 .

[10]  Hua Dong,et al.  Adjustable stiffness tubes via thermal modulation of a low melting point polymer , 2012 .

[11]  Gia Y. Kim,et al.  Model filled polymers , 1990 .

[12]  K. L. Jerina,et al.  Ultimate strength properties of explanted and control Silastic II silicone gel-filled breast implant shells ☆ ☆☆ , 2000 .

[13]  N. Stellwagen Apparent pore size of polyacrylamide gels: Comparison of gels cast and run in Tris‐acetate‐EDTA and Tris‐borate‐EDTA buffers , 1998, Electrophoresis.

[14]  T. Bjarnsholt,et al.  Bacterial infection as a likely cause of adverse reactions to polyacrylamide hydrogel fillers in cosmetic surgery. , 2013, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[15]  Shaoyi Jiang,et al.  Inhibition of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on zwitterionic surfaces. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[16]  R. Vargiolu,et al.  Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests , 2009, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[17]  Bo Nilsson,et al.  The role of complement in biomaterial-induced inflammation. , 2007, Molecular immunology.

[18]  H. Lappin-Scott,et al.  Detachment, surface migration, and other dynamic behavior in bacterial biofilms revealed by digital time-lapse imaging. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  A. Rish Polyacrylamide gel 10 years experience: with particular reference to complications from filling of the body of the lip , 2014, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[20]  M. Shamonin,et al.  Ultra-Soft PDMS-Based Magnetoactive Elastomers as Dynamic Cell Culture Substrata , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  P. Flory,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Cross‐Linked Polymer Networks I. Rubberlike Elasticity , 1943 .

[22]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Bacterial adhesion and growth on a polymer brush-coating. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[23]  E. Variano,et al.  Refractive-index-matched hydrogel materials for measuring flow-structure interactions , 2012, 1212.0820.

[24]  E. Yebra-Pimentel,et al.  Hydrogel Contact Lenses Surface Roughness and Bacterial Adhesion , 2012 .

[25]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Microbial Adhesion in Flow Displacement Systems , 2006, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[26]  T. Williams,et al.  Bacterial interactions with contact lenses; effects of lens material, lens wear and microbial physiology. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[27]  James D Bryers,et al.  Medical biofilms. , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  D. Beebe,et al.  Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[29]  Emily F. Smith,et al.  Biomaterial modification of urinary catheters with antimicrobials to give long-term broadspectrum antibiofilm activity. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[30]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[31]  Stephanie J Bryant,et al.  The effects of substrate stiffness on the in vitro activation of macrophages and in vivo host response to poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[32]  Jessica D. Schiffman,et al.  Fewer Bacteria Adhere to Softer Hydrogels. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[33]  B. Derjaguin A theory of interaction of particles in presence of electric double layers and the stability of lyophobe colloids and disperse systems , 1993 .

[34]  Mi Zhou,et al.  Self-assembled peptide-based hydrogels as scaffolds for anchorage-dependent cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[35]  S. Poulsen,et al.  Bacterial biofilm formation and treatment in soft tissue fillers. , 2014, Pathogens and disease.

[36]  Quan Cheng,et al.  Microfluidic immunoassay for bacterial toxins with supported phospholipid bilayer membranes on poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[37]  A M Hodge,et al.  Elastic and viscoelastic characterization of agar. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[38]  A. Amer,et al.  Dermal filler complications: a clinicopathologic study with a spectrum of histologic reaction patterns. , 2015, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[39]  Dan L. Sackett,et al.  Fabrication of Hydrogels with Steep Stiffness Gradients for Studying Cell Mechanical Response , 2012, PloS one.

[40]  Dacheng Ren,et al.  Stiffness of cross-linked poly(dimethylsiloxane) affects bacterial adhesion and antibiotic susceptibility of attached cells. , 2014, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[41]  S. Van Dyke,et al.  Severe Acute Local Reactions to a Hyaluronic Acid-derived Dermal Filler. , 2010, The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology.

[42]  Ajay Gopinathan,et al.  Measuring the stiffness of bacterial cells from growth rates in hydrogels of tunable elasticity , 2012, Molecular microbiology.

[43]  Joanna Verran,et al.  Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions. , 2005, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[44]  Cai‐Feng Wang,et al.  Robust Self-Healing Hydrogels Assisted by Cross-Linked Nanofiber Networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[45]  K. Ostgaard,et al.  Adhesion of the marine bacterium Pseudomonas sp. NCIMB 2021 to different hydrogel surfaces. , 2003, Water research.

[46]  P. Flory Principles of polymer chemistry , 1953 .

[47]  C. Maas,et al.  Injectable Fillers: Review of Material and Properties , 2015, Facial Plastic Surgery.

[48]  Ronn S. Friedlander,et al.  Mucin Biopolymers Prevent Bacterial Aggregation by Retaining Cells in the Free-Swimming State , 2012, Current Biology.

[49]  S. Galiacy,et al.  Sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate mechanical and adhesive properties. , 2006, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[50]  Soft-tissue filler complications: the important role of biofilms. , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[51]  B. Ersbøll,et al.  Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. , 2000, Microbiology.

[52]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[53]  C. Parmenter,et al.  Biomaterial modi fi cation of urinary catheters with antimicrobials to give long-term broadspectrum antibio fi lm activity , 2015 .

[54]  J. J. Aklonis,et al.  Model filled polymers. VI. Determination of the crosslink density of polymeric beads by swelling , 1991 .

[55]  G. Abbott Detachment , 2018, Thucydides.

[56]  D A Weitz,et al.  Investigating the microenvironments of inhomogeneous soft materials with multiple particle tracking. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[57]  L. Christensen Host Tissue Interaction, Fate, and Risks of Degradable and Nondegradable Gel Fillers , 2009, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[58]  Claudio DeLorenzi,et al.  Complications of injectable fillers, part I. , 2013, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[59]  N. Peppas,et al.  Correlation between mesh size and equilibrium degree of swelling of polymeric networks. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[60]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Macrophage phagocytic activity toward adhering staphylococci on cationic and patterned hydrogel coatings versus common biomaterials. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[61]  D. Michaelis,et al.  Tomographic PIV measurements in a turbulent lifted jet flame , 2013 .

[62]  C. Chiu,et al.  Development of two alginate-based wound dressings , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[63]  N. Stellwagen,et al.  Estimation of polyacrylamide gel pore size from Ferguson plots of linear DNA fragments. II. Comparison of gels with different crosslinker concentrations, added agarose and added linear polyacrylamide , 1991, Electrophoresis.

[64]  A. Borzacchiello,et al.  Rheological Properties of Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers , 2011, Journal of applied biomaterials & biomechanics : JABB.

[65]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[66]  T. Pavicic,et al.  Dermal Fillers in Aesthetics: An Overview of Adverse Events and Treatment Approaches , 2015, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[67]  R. Glogau,et al.  Effect of Injection Techniques on the Rate of Local Adverse Events in Patients Implanted with Nonanimal Hyaluronic Acid Gel Dermal Fillers , 2008, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[68]  P. Flory,et al.  STATISTICAL MECHANICS OF CROSS-LINKED POLYMER NETWORKS II. SWELLING , 1943 .

[69]  K. Beer,et al.  Nonmedical-grade Injections of Permanent Fillers: Medical and Medicolegal Considerations. , 2013, The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology.

[70]  P. M. Pereira,et al.  Cell shape dynamics during the staphylococcal cell cycle , 2015, Nature Communications.

[71]  L. Jones,et al.  Tear exchange and contact lenses: a review. , 2015, Journal of optometry.

[72]  R. Donlan Biofilm formation: a clinically relevant microbiological process. , 2001, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[73]  I. Linossier,et al.  Alteration of bacterial adhesion induced by the substrate stiffness. , 2014, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[74]  M. Gónzalez-Martín,et al.  Studying the influence of surface topography on bacterial adhesion using spatially organized microtopographic surface patterns. , 2014, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[75]  D. Weibel,et al.  Bacteria-surface interactions. , 2013, Soft matter.

[76]  A. Sirivat,et al.  Controlled Aloin Release from Crosslinked Polyacrylamide Hydrogels: Effects of Mesh Size, Electric Field Strength and a Conductive Polymer , 2013, Materials.

[77]  Anubhav Tripathi,et al.  Viscoelastic response of human skin to low magnitude physiologically relevant shear. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[78]  Robert D. Boyd,et al.  Use of the atomic force microscope to determine the effect of substratum surface topography on bacterial adhesion , 2002 .

[79]  M Morra,et al.  Bacterial adhesion to polymer surfaces: a critical review of surface thermodynamic approaches. , 1997, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[80]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  How Do Bacteria Know They Are on a Surface and Regulate Their Response to an Adhering State? , 2012, PLoS pathogens.