Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke

Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are used in stroke rehabilitation to translate brain signals into intended movements of the paralyzed limb. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of BCI-based therapies remain unclear. Here we show that BCI coupled to functional electrical stimulation (FES) elicits significant, clinically relevant, and lasting motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors more effectively than sham FES. Such recovery is associated to quantitative signatures of functional neuroplasticity. BCI patients exhibit a significant functional recovery after the intervention, which remains 6–12 months after the end of therapy. Electroencephalography analysis pinpoints significant differences in favor of the BCI group, mainly consisting in an increase in functional connectivity between motor areas in the affected hemisphere. This increase is significantly correlated with functional improvement. Results illustrate how a BCI–FES therapy can drive significant functional recovery and purposeful plasticity thanks to contingent activation of body natural efferent and afferent pathways.Brain-computer interface (BCI) can improve motor skills on stroke patients. This study shows that BCI-controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy can cause cortical reorganization due to activation of efferent and afferent pathways, and this effect can be long lasting in a brain region specific manner.

[1]  Gwyn McClelland.  Survivors , 1891, The Hospital.

[2]  J. Raven.  TESTING THE MENTAL ABILITY OF ADULTS , 1942 .

[3]  O. J. Espinosa.  [Hemiplegia]. , 1957, Medicina.

[4]  S. Rees,et al.  Renshaw cell activity in man1 , 1973, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  N. Miller,et al.  An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Granat,et al.  Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. , 1999, Stroke.

[8]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Timothy S Miles,et al.  Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  L. Cohen,et al.  Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[11]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Determination of information flow direction among brain structures by a modified directed transfer function (dDTF) method , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  D N Rushton,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation and rehabilitation--an hypothesis. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  C. Braun,et al.  Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[16]  M. Sur,et al.  Patterning and Plasticity of the Cerebral Cortex , 2005, Science.

[17]  Jürgen Brockmöller,et al.  Pharmacogenetics-based therapeutic recommendations — ready for clinical practice? , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  Rick M Dijkhuizen,et al.  Structural and functional plasticity in the somatosensory cortex of chronic stroke patients. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[20]  J. Guardia,et al.  Feature Extraction for Multi-class BCI using Canonical Variates Analysis , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[21]  B. Dobkin.  Brain–computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Thomas Sinkjær,et al.  Cortical excitability changes following grasping exercise augmented with electrical stimulation , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[24]  G. Alon,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) May Modify the Poor Prognosis of Stroke Survivors with Severe Motor Loss of the Upper Extremity: A Preliminary Study , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[25]  E. Fetz,et al.  Direct control of paralyzed muscles by cortical neurons , 2008, Nature.

[26]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Additional Services and Information for Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke , 2022 .

[27]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[28]  Mark E. Dohring,et al.  Feasibility of a New Application of Noninvasive Brain Computer Interface (BCI): A Case Study of Training for Recovery of Volitional Motor Control After Stroke , 2009, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[29]  Janet L. Taylor,et al.  Voluntary Motor Output Is Altered by Spike-Timing-Dependent Changes in the Human Corticospinal Pathway , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  G. Prasad,et al.  Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[31]  C. Neuper,et al.  Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[32]  C. Braun,et al.  Combination of Brain-Computer Interface Training and Goal-Directed Physical Therapy in Chronic Stroke: A Case Report , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[33]  D. F. Collins,et al.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[34]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke , 2011, NeuroImage.

[35]  C. Braun,et al.  Chronic stroke recovery after combined BCI training and physiotherapy: a case report. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[36]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[37]  A. Pollock,et al.  Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke , 2012, The Lancet Neurology.

[38]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  The behavioral significance of coherent resting-state oscillations after stroke , 2012, NeuroImage.

[39]  S. Page,et al.  Clinically Important Differences for the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in People With Minimal to Moderate Impairment Due to Chronic Stroke , 2012, Physical Therapy.

[40]  Jonas B. Zimmermann,et al.  Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord—restoring motor function , 2012, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[41]  David J. Guggenmos,et al.  Restoration of function after brain damage using a neural prosthesis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  A. Schwartz,et al.  High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia , 2013, The Lancet.

[43]  W. Martin Usrey,et al.  Attention Enhances Synaptic Efficacy and Signal-to-Noise in Neural Circuits , 2013, Nature.

[44]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Transferring brain-computer interfaces beyond the laboratory: Successful application control for motor-disabled users , 2013, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[45]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Brain–machine interface: closer to therapeutic reality? , 2013, The Lancet.

[46]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[47]  J. Bornstein,et al.  Effects of oxaliplatin on mouse myenteric neurons and colonic motility , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[48]  Elke Edelmann,et al.  Dopamine regulates intrinsic excitability thereby gating successful induction of spike timing-dependent plasticity in CA1 of the hippocampus , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[49]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Resting State Changes in Functional Connectivity Correlate With Movement Recovery for BCI and Robot-Assisted Upper-Extremity Training After Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[50]  J. Millán,et al.  Personalized Neuroprosthetics , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[51]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Efficacy of brain-computer interface-driven neuromuscular electrical stimulation for chronic paresis after stroke. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[52]  G. Courtine,et al.  Muscle Spindle Feedback Directs Locomotor Recovery and Circuit Reorganization after Spinal Cord Injury , 2014, Cell.

[53]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[54]  V. Dietz,et al.  Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[55]  G. Fink,et al.  Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[56]  Brittany M. Young,et al.  Changes in functional connectivity correlate with behavioral gains in stroke patients after therapy using a brain-computer interface device , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[57]  E-J Hoogerwerf,et al.  Clinical evaluation of BrainTree, a motor imagery hybrid BCI speller , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[58]  Lucy Dodakian,et al.  Connectivity measures are robust biomarkers of cortical function and plasticity after stroke. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[59]  M. Molinari,et al.  Brain–computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[60]  A. Daffertshofer,et al.  Generalizability of the Proportional Recovery Model for the Upper Extremity After an Ischemic Stroke , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[61]  Matthew A Petoe,et al.  Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[62]  Jessica P McCabe,et al.  Recovery of post stroke proximal arm function, driven by complex neuroplastic bilateral brain activation patterns and predicted by baseline motor dysfunction severity , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[63]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Towards Independence: A BCI Telepresence Robot for People With Severe Motor Disabilities , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[64]  L. Miller,et al.  Brain-controlled neuromuscular stimulation to drive neural plasticity and functional recovery , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[65]  Armin Schnider,et al.  Coherent neural oscillations predict future motor and language improvement after stroke. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[66]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Predicting motor improvement after stroke with clinical assessment and diffusion tensor imaging , 2016, Neurology.

[67]  A. Pavlovic,et al.  Efficient neuroplasticity induction in chronic stroke patients by an associative brain-computer interface. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  Nicholas V. Annetta,et al.  Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia , 2016, Nature.

[69]  J. Pons,et al.  Corrigendum: Low Latency Estimation of Motor Intentions to Assist Reaching Movements along Multiple Sessions in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[70]  E. Biryukova,et al.  Post-stroke Rehabilitation Training with a Motor-Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Controlled Hand Exoskeleton: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[71]  Francis R. Willett,et al.  Restoration of reaching and grasping in a person with tetraplegia through brain-controlled muscle stimulation: a proof-of-concept demonstration , 2017, The Lancet.

[72]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  Contralesional Brain–Computer Interface Control of a Powered Exoskeleton for Motor Recovery in Chronic Stroke Survivors , 2017, Stroke.

[73]  Serafeim Perdikis,et al.  mano: A Wearable Hand Exoskeleton for Activities of Daily Living and Neurorehabilitation , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.