Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances fine motor control of the hemiparetic ankle: implications for rehabilitation

We set out to answer two questions with this study: 1. Can stroke patients improve voluntary control of their paretic ankle by practising a visuo-motor ankle-tracking task? 2. Are practice effects enhanced with non-invasive brain stimulation? A carefully selected sample of chronic stroke patients able to perform the experimental task attended three data collection sessions. Facilitatory transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was applied in a random order over the lower limb primary motor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere or the non-lesioned hemisphere or sham stimulation was delivered over the lesioned hemisphere. In each session, tDCS was applied as patients practiced tracking a sinusoidal waveform for 15 min using dorsiflexion–plantarflexion movements of their paretic ankle. The difference in tracking error prior to, and after, the 15 min of practice was calculated. A practice effect was revealed following sham stimulation, and this effect was enhanced with tDCS applied over the lesioned hemisphere. The practice effect observed following sham stimulation was eliminated by tDCS applied over the non-lesioned hemisphere. The study provides the first evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation applied to the lesioned motor cortex of moderate- to well-recovered stroke patients enhances voluntary control of the paretic ankle. The results provide a basis for examining whether this enhanced ankle control can be induced in patients with greater impairments and whether enhanced control of a single or multiple lower limb joints improves hemiparetic gait patterns.

[1]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Barbara J. Knowlton,et al.  Neural substrates of motor memory consolidation depend on practice structure , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Bienenstock,et al.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Motor skill training and strength training are associated with different plastic changes in the central nervous system. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  J. Stinear,et al.  A paradox: after stroke, the non‐lesioned lower limb motor cortex may be maladaptive , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[7]  A. Curt,et al.  Ankle motor skill is intact in spinal cord injury, unlike stroke , 2010, Neurology.

[8]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Consensus: Can transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation enhance motor learning and memory formation? , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  S. Sato,et al.  Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals , 2005, Neurology.

[11]  T George Hornby,et al.  Stimulation‐induced changes in lower limb corticomotor excitability during treadmill walking in humans , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  L. Forrester,et al.  Reliability of TMS motor evoked potentials in quadriceps of subjects with chronic hemiparesis after stroke , 2009, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[13]  J. Stinear,et al.  The Effects of Transcranial Stimulation on Paretic Lower Limb Motor Excitability During Walking , 2009, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[14]  M. Folstein,et al.  Mini-mental state exam in clinical practice. , 1987, Hospital practice.

[15]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[16]  Monica A. Gorassini,et al.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  J. Stinear,et al.  Focal and bidirectional modulation of lower limb motor cortex using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2010, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  Monica A. Perez,et al.  Motor skill training induces changes in the excitability of the leg cortical area in healthy humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Consensus: "Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?" , 2008, Brain stimulation.

[20]  Takashi Hanakawa,et al.  Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Edward J. Auerbach,et al.  fMRI analysis of ankle movement tracking training in subject with stroke , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Amy L Shortal Recovery of Walking Function in Stroke Patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study , 1996 .

[24]  S. Olney,et al.  Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics , 1996 .

[25]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[26]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.