FBA fMRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas

This study examined the contributions of two previously-identified brain regions -the extrastriate and fusiform body areas (EBA and FBA) -to the visual representation of the human form. Specifically we measured in these two areas the magnitude of fMRI response as a function of the amount of the human figure that is visible in the image, in the range from a single finger to the entire body. A second experiment determined the selectivity of these regions for body and body part stimuli relative to closely-matched control images. We found a gradual increase in the selectivity of the EBA as a function of the amount of body shown. In contrast, the FBA shows a step like function, with no significant selectivity for individual fingers or hands. In a third experiment we demonstrate that the response pattern seen in EBA does not extend to adjacent motionselective area hMT. We propose an interpretation of these results by analogy to nearby face-selective regions OFA (occipital face area) and FFA (fusiform face area). Specifically, we hypothesize that the EBA analyzes bodies at the level of parts (as has been proposed for faces in the OFA), whereas FBA (by analogy to FFA) may have a role in processing the configuration of body parts into wholes. Page 2 of 34

[1]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[3]  K. Nakayama,et al.  RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN FUSIFORM FACE AREA , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[4]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[5]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Domain specificity in visual cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Laurel J. Lewis,et al.  Linear systems analysis , 1969 .

[7]  H. Branch Coslett,et al.  Evidence for Multiple, Distinct Representations of the Human Body , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  P. Downing,et al.  Within‐subject reproducibility of category‐specific visual activation with functional MRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[10]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  The role of the extrastriate body area in action perception , 2006, Social neuroscience.

[14]  C. Gross,et al.  Representations of faces and body parts in macaque temporal cortex: a functional MRI study. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  P. Downing,et al.  The effect of viewpoint on body representation in the extrastriate body area , 2004, Neuroreport.

[16]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or ‘representational momentum’ , 2000, Current Biology.

[17]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Is the extrastriate body area involved in motor actions? , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Robert Desimone,et al.  PROPERTIES OF INFERIOR TEMPORAL NEURONS IN THE MACAQUE , 1981 .

[20]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[22]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[23]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Lindsey J. Powell,et al.  My body or yours? The effect of visual perspective on cortical body representations. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  P. Downing,et al.  Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[27]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[28]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[30]  Rebecca F. Schwarzlose,et al.  Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. , 2010, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Patterns of fMRI Activity Dissociate Overlapping Functional Brain Areas that Respond to Biological Motion , 2006, Neuron.

[33]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform “face areas” discriminate novel from visually familiar faces , 2003, NeuroImage.

[34]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Overlapping Lateral Occipitotemporal Activations Using Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis , 2006 .