Sound absorption of a micro-perforated panel backed by an irregular-shaped cavity.

In the pursuit of more effective noise control devices, the cavity backed micro-perforated panel absorber (CBMPPA) is developed in this study. A CBMPPA differs from the conventional micro-perforated panel (MPP) absorber in that the MPP is backed by a trapezoidal cavity, which allows more effective vibroacoustic coupling between the MPP and the cavity. A two-dimensional theoretical model is established and tested both numerically and experimentally. Based on the verified theoretical model, sound absorption performance of a trapezoidal CBMPPA is investigated numerically. Results show that the shape of the backing cavity can significantly alter the sound absorption mechanisms and frequency distribution of overall sound absorption coefficient of the absorber. Further analyses show that acoustic modes that are initially decoupled from the MPP in the rectangular configuration are coupled with the air motion in the MPP, which accounts for the change in absorption pattern of the trapezoidal CBMPPA. By the same token, it also provides the flexibility for tuning the effective absorption range of the absorber. Due to the varying impedance matching conditions, the absorption performance of the trapezoidal CBMPPA exhibits obvious local characteristics over the MPP surface, which contrasts with the spatially uniform absorption in the conventional MPP absorber.

[1]  L. Meirovitch,et al.  Fundamentals of Vibrations , 2000 .

[2]  J Pan,et al.  Effects of the inclination of a rigid wall on the free vibration characteristics of acoustic modes in a trapezoidal cavity. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D Maa,et al.  THEORY AND DESIGN OF MICROPERFORATED PANEL SOUND-ABSORBING CONSTRUCTIONS , 1975 .

[4]  H. V. Fuchs,et al.  Acrylic-glass sound absorbers in the plenum of the deutscher bundestag , 1997 .

[5]  H. V. Fuchs,et al.  PREDICTING THE ABSORPTION OF OPEN WEAVE TEXTILES AND MICRO-PERFORATED MEMBRANES BACKED BY AN AIR SPACE , 1999 .

[6]  Y. Y. Li,et al.  Energy transmission in a mechanically-linked double-wall structure coupled to an acoustic enclosure. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Y. Y. Li,et al.  Modifications of acoustic modes and coupling due to a leaning wall in a rectangular cavity , 2004 .

[8]  Mei Q. Wu,et al.  Micro-perforated panels for duct silencing , 1997 .

[9]  Franck Sgard,et al.  Modeling of perforated plates and screens using rigid frame porous models , 2007 .

[11]  P. Doak Excitation, transmission and radiation of sound from source distributions in hard-walled ducts of finite length (I): The effects of duct cross-section geometry and source distribution space-time pattern , 1973 .

[12]  Dong-Kyung Lee,et al.  Estimation of the absorption performance of multiple layer perforated panel systems by transfer matrix method , 2004 .

[13]  Francesco Asdrubali,et al.  Properties of transparent sound-absorbing panels for use in noise barriers , 2007 .

[14]  Dah-You Maa,et al.  Microperforated-panel wideband absorbers , 1987 .

[15]  Jie Pan,et al.  WAVE TRAPPING BARRIERS , 2004 .

[16]  D. Maa,et al.  Potential of microperforated panel absorber , 1998 .

[17]  G. R. Watts Acoustic performance of parallel traffic noise barriers , 1996 .

[18]  Eric Wai Ming Lee,et al.  Sound absorption of a finite flexible micro-perforated panel backed by an air cavity , 2005 .

[19]  Jian Kang,et al.  Feasibility of applying micro-perforated absorbers in acoustic window systems , 2005 .