A SPATIALLY EXPLICIT HABITAT SELECTION MODEL INCORPORATING HOME RANGE BEHAVIOR

Understanding habitat selection is of primary interest in theoretical and applied ecology. One approach is to infer habitat selection processes from differences in population densities between habitats using methods such as isodar and isoleg analysis. Another approach is to directly observe the movements of individuals. However, habitat selection models based on movement data often fail to adequately incorporate spatial processes. This is problematic if the probability of selecting a particular habitat is dependent upon its spatial context. This would occur, for example, where organisms exhibit home range behavior and the choice of habitat is dependent on its location relative to the home range. In this paper we present a spatially explicit habitat selection model for movement data that incorporates home range behavior as a spatial process. Our approach extends a previous model by formulating the probability of selecting a habitat as a function of its distance from the animal's current location and home range center. We demonstrate that these enhancements lead to more parsimonious models when applied to a koala radio-tracking data set from eastern Australia. This approach could also be applied to modeling other spatial habitat selection processes, leading to more biologically meaningful models for a range of species and applications.

[1]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection , 1987, Evolutionary Ecology.

[2]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1997 .

[3]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates , 1999 .

[4]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife , 1996 .

[5]  Paul R. Moorcroft,et al.  Home range analysis using a mechanistic home range model , 1999 .

[6]  Chris D. Thomas,et al.  Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies : implications for metapopulation structure , 1996 .

[7]  R. Holt Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution , 1985 .

[8]  Neil M. White Ecology of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) in rural south-east Queensland, Australia , 1999 .

[9]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  A Theory of Habitat Selection , 1981 .

[10]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[11]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[12]  Tomas Roslin,et al.  Dung beetle movements at two spatial scales , 2000 .

[13]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1978 .

[14]  John Callaghan,et al.  Determining the distribution of Koala habitat across a shire as a basis for conservation: a case study from Port Stephens, New South Wales , 1998 .

[15]  A. Melzer,et al.  Tree use, diet and home range of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) at Blair Athol, central Queensland , 2002 .

[16]  S. Cork,et al.  Digestion and nutrition in the koala: a review , 1991 .

[17]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[18]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[19]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[20]  Bruce D. Leopold,et al.  Space use and multi-scale habitat selection of adult raccoons in Central Mississippi , 2003 .

[21]  Dag Ø. Hjermann,et al.  Analyzing habitat selection in animals without well-defined home ranges , 2000 .

[22]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[23]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[24]  Norman A. Slade,et al.  Robust statisitics for spatial analysis: the center of activity , 1985 .

[25]  R. Orbach,et al.  Dynamics of Fractal Networks , 1986, Science.

[26]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection , 2003, Oecologia.

[27]  John Callaghan,et al.  The tree species preferences of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) inhabiting forest and woodland communities on Quaternary deposits in the Port Stephens area, New South Wales , 2000 .

[28]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[29]  Norman A. Slade,et al.  Testing For Independence of Observations in Animal Movements , 1985 .

[30]  R. Fisher,et al.  On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics , 1922 .

[31]  B. Manly A Model for Certain Types of Selection Experiments , 1974 .

[32]  Alan R. Johnson,et al.  Diffusion in Fractcal Landscapes: Simulations and Experimental Studies of Tenebrionid Beetle Movements , 1992 .

[33]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[34]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[35]  Ross Maller,et al.  Daily movement patterns of the spiny lobster Jasus edwardsii (Hutton) on a shallow reef in northern New Zealand , 1991 .

[36]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .