To Evaluate Maxillary Permanent Denture Base Retention with Two Step and Single Step Impression Technique Using Polyether Impression Material: An In Vivo Study

Aim of the Study: The aim of study is to compare maxillary denture base retention with two step and single step impression technique using medium body polyether as wash impression material. Materials and Methods: 15 healthy completely edentulous patients were included in this study. For each patient, three special trays were constructed, thus, having total 45 samples further sub divided into three subgroups of 15 each. In Group 1 and Group 2 patients, border molding was carried out with green stick and putty addition silicone respectively. In group 3 patient, no border molding was carried out. In all 3 groups, definitive impression with medium body polyether was made. Final analysis was carried out with Turkey HSD post hoc test in which significant difference was found in retention values of denture bases made for group 1, 2 and group 3 patients. Results: Insignificant difference in retention between group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.7185) and significant difference in retention values of group 1and group 3 (p = 0.0005) and group 2 and group 3 (0.0062). Conclusion: Two step impression technique is more retentive as compared to one step impression technique.

[1]  Prince Kumar,et al.  Evaluation and Comparison of the Effect of Different Border Molding Materials on Complete Denture Retention: An in vivo Study. , 2018, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[2]  Abdulaziz AlHelal,et al.  Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: A clinical study , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  Ivy Coutinho,et al.  Comparative evaluation of border molding using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches: A clinical study , 2016, Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.

[4]  R R Regis,et al.  The importance of a two-step impression procedure for complete denture fabrication: a systematic review of the literature. , 2016, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[5]  U. Pai,et al.  A Single Step Impression Technique of Flabby Ridges Using Monophase Polyvinylsiloxane Material: A Case Report , 2014, Case reports in dentistry.

[6]  J. Kumar,et al.  Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study. , 2013, Journal of international oral health : JIOH.

[7]  J. Patel Comparative evaluation of border morphology produced by three different border molding materials , 2010 .

[8]  G. Troendle,et al.  The Use of Injectable Polyvinylsiloxane as Medium for Border–Molding Denture Impressions , 1992 .

[9]  D. E. Smith,et al.  One-step border molding of complete denture impressions using a polyether impression material. , 1979, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  E. W. Skinner,et al.  A clinical study of the forces required to dislodge maxillary denture bases of various designs. , 1953, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[11]  Simrat Kaur,et al.  Comparative analysis of the retention of maxillary denture base with and without border molding using zinc oxide eugenol impression paste , 2016, Indian journal of dentistry.

[12]  Renu Gupta,et al.  COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO BORDER MOLDING TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS ON MAXILLARY COMPLETE DENTURE RETENTION- AN IN-VIVO STUDY , 2015 .

[13]  H. Tan,et al.  Variability in the shape of maxillary vestibular impressions recorded with modeling plastic and a polyether impression material. , 1996, The International journal of prosthodontics.