Spatial Modulation in Zero-Padded Single Carrier Communication

In this paper, we consider the Spatial Modulation (SM) system in a frequency selective channel under single carrier (SC) communication scenario and propose zero-padding instead of cyclic prefix considered in the existing literature. We show that the zero-padded single carrier (ZP-SC) SM system offers full multipath diversity under maximum-likelihood (ML) detection, unlike the cyclic prefixed SM system. Further, we show that the order of ML decoding complexity in the proposed ZP-SC SM system is independent of the frame length and depends only on the number of multipath links between the transmitter and the receiver. Thus, we show that the zero-padding in the SC SM system has two fold advantage over cyclic prefixing: 1) gives full multipath diversity, and 2) offers relatively low ML decoding complexity. Furthermore, we extend the partial interference cancellation receiver (PIC-R) proposed by Guo and Xia for the decoding of STBCs in order to convert the ZP-SC system into a set of flat-fading subsystems. We show that the transmission of any full rank STBC over these subsystems achieves full transmit, receive as well as multipath diversity under PIC-R. With the aid of this extended PIC-R, we show that the ZP-SC SM system achieves receive and multipath diversity with a decoding complexity same as that of the SM system in flat-fading scenario.

[1]  Ali Ghrayeb,et al.  Spatial modulation: optimal detection and performance analysis , 2008, IEEE Communications Letters.

[2]  Rakshith Rajashekar,et al.  Low Complexity Maximum Likelihood Detection in Spatial Modulation Systems , 2012, ArXiv.

[3]  Xiang-Gen Xia,et al.  On full diversity space-time block codes with partial interference cancellation group decoding , 2009, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Reinaldo A. Valenzuela,et al.  V-BLAST: an architecture for realizing very high data rates over the rich-scattering wireless channel , 1998, 1998 URSI International Symposium on Signals, Systems, and Electronics. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX167).

[5]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Performance of Spatial Modulation in the Presence of Channel Estimation Errors , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[6]  Harald Haas,et al.  Transmit-Diversity for Spatial Modulation (SM): Towards the Design of High-Rate Spatially-Modulated Space-Time Block Codes , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[7]  Harald Haas,et al.  Performance Comparison of Different Spatial Modulation Schemes in Correlated Fading Channels , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[8]  Chang Wook Ahn,et al.  Spatial Modulation - A New Low Complexity Spectral Efficiency Enhancing Technique , 2006, 2006 First International Conference on Communications and Networking in China.

[9]  Emanuele Viterbo,et al.  A universal lattice code decoder for fading channels , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Ananthanarayanan Chockalingam,et al.  Spatial modulation and space shift keying in single carrier communication , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[11]  Dirk Wübben,et al.  Impulse shortening and equalization of frequency-selective MIMO channels with respect to layered space-time architectures , 2003, Signal Process..

[12]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  New Trellis Code Design for Spatial Modulation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Space-time block coding for spatial modulation , 2010, 21st Annual IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[14]  Harald Haas,et al.  Spatial Modulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.