Application of fuzzy AHP for ranking and selection of alternatives in construction project management

AbstractThe construction project management (CPM) is very important and large segment of entire project management (PM). Realisation of construction projects is usually long term process which requests significant financial, material, human and other resources to fulfil contracted obligations and achieve a good quality of works. Therefore, making good decisions with the satisfaction of various criteria is one of the main conditions to achieve planed business objectives and finish the project in contracted time with good quality. This paper proposes a new procedure for determination of the weights of criteria and alternatives in the Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) with trapezoidal fuzzy number using a new method for finding eigenvelues and eigenvectors of the criteria and alternatives, which is based on expected values of the fuzzy numbers and their products. Local and global fuzzy weights of the alternatives are determined using linear programming. In the paper a formula for ranking fuzzy numbers ...

[1]  D. Dubois,et al.  The mean value of a fuzzy number , 1987 .

[2]  İrfan Ertuğrul,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection , 2008 .

[3]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Risk assessment of construction projects , 2010 .

[4]  Aviad Shapira,et al.  AHP-Based Equipment Selection Model for Construction Projects , 2005 .

[5]  Osman Taylan,et al.  Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria , 2010 .

[7]  L. Zadeh Probability measures of Fuzzy events , 1968 .

[8]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Decision Making in Construction Management: AHP and Expert Choice Approach , 2017 .

[9]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[10]  Xu Ruoning,et al.  Extensions of the analytic hierarchy process in fuzzy environment , 1992 .

[11]  Sławomir Biruk,et al.  Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment , 2010 .

[12]  Jamal Shahrabi,et al.  PROJECT SELECTION BY USING FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS TECHNIQUE , 2007 .

[13]  M. Salehi,et al.  Project Selection by Using a Fuzzy TOPSIS Technique , 2008 .

[14]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  N. Petrusenko,et al.  Women in the World of Gender Stereotypes : The Case of the Russian Female Terrorists at the Beginning of the 20th Century , 2011 .

[17]  Nang-Fei Pan,et al.  FUZZY AHP APPROACH FOR SELECTING THE SUITABLE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION METHOD , 2008 .

[18]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[19]  E. Lee,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events , 1988 .

[20]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Evaluation of Advanced Construction Technology with AHP Method , 1992 .

[21]  Alfredo del Caño,et al.  Fuzzy method for analysing uncertainty in the sustainable design of concrete structures , 2016 .

[22]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[23]  Renny Pradina Kusumawardani,et al.  The Third Information Systems International Conference Application of Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method for Decision Making in Human Resource Manager Selection Process , 2015 .

[24]  Natasa Prascevic,et al.  One modification of fuzzy TOPSIS method , 2013 .

[25]  Natasa Prascevic,et al.  Application of fuzzy AHP method based on eigenvalues for decision making in construction industry , 2016 .

[26]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method , 2001 .

[27]  Nigel J. Smith,et al.  Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment , 2007 .

[28]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[29]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[30]  M. Kwiesielewicz,et al.  A note on the fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[31]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[32]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[33]  Makarand Hastak Advanced automation or conventional construction process , 1998 .

[34]  Gul Polat,et al.  Subcontractor selection using the integration of the AHP and PROMETHEE methods , 2015 .

[35]  Reza Zanjirani Farahani,et al.  Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives , 2010, Appl. Soft Comput..

[36]  Kamal M. Al‐Subhi Al‐Harbi,et al.  Application of the AHP in project management , 2001 .

[37]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .