Culturally-Relevant Persuasive Technology

Persuasive technology (PT) has been defined by B. J. Fogg as "any interactive computing system designed to change peoples attitudes or behaviors". The kinds of attitudes people hold, and the behaviours they exhibit, are influenced by culture, so cultural beliefs play a large role in persuasion. The cross-cultural psychology literature has demonstrated the power of culture on attitude change. To date, however, there has been limited persuasive technology research outside of countries characterised as having individualist culture, where individualism describes cultures in which society members have a primarily individual identity. Little research has explicitly investigated the relationship between persuasive technology and culture. In this thesis, we investigated the hypothesis that persuasive technology is more effective when it reflects the culture of its intended target audience. Firstly, we established a set of effective, culturally-relevant persuasive technology strategies, almost all of which are targeted at use in tools for collectivist audiences. The strategies are based on a combination of findings from the cross-cultural psychology literature focused on the dimensions of individualism and collectivism, an analysis of existing PT strategies, and qualitative insights. Secondly, we developed a culturally-relevant PT prototype based on several of our strategies, in the form of two versions of a game titled Smoke? about smoking cessation. One version of Smoke? was designed to be more persuasive for a NZ European player audience, while the other was designed to be more persuasive for a Maori player audience. We conducted focus groups with potential players, the insights of which guided how we applied several of our culturally-relevant PT strategies in the design of the two game versions. Finally, we evaluated both game versions on individualist, and collectivist test players, using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The results of our evaluation support our hypothesis. Not only did both sets of players engage with, and use the culturally-relevant interface elements of the game designed for their culture, they also demonstrated that the culturally-relevant game versions had increased their anti-smoking beliefs.

[1]  Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones,et al.  Culture and International Usability Testing: The Effects of Culture in Structured Interviews , 2004, ArXiv.

[2]  Ian Bogost,et al.  Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames , 2007 .

[3]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[4]  J. Biggs,et al.  The Process of Learning , 1981 .

[5]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[6]  D. Norman The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[7]  C. Chiu,et al.  Multicultural minds. A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[8]  Paul Pedersen Simulations: A Safe Place to Take Risks in Discussing Cultural Differences , 1995 .

[9]  Ralph E. Johnson,et al.  Design Patterns: Abstraction and Reuse of Object-Oriented Design , 1993, ECOOP.

[10]  Johnny Patterson,et al.  Exploring Maori Values , 1992 .

[11]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  Empathy Versus Price: The Influence of Emotional Appeals Across Cultures , 1998 .

[12]  Patricia Russo,et al.  How fluent is your interface?: designing for international users , 1993, INTERCHI.

[13]  Mary C. Brinton,et al.  The Japanese Woman: Traditional Image and Changing Reality. , 1994 .

[14]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions , 1998, CHI.

[15]  M. Mooij Global marketing and advertising : understanding cultural paradoxes , 1998 .

[16]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[17]  D. Abrams,et al.  Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: a controlled clinical trial. , 1999, Addiction.

[18]  S. Schwartz Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[19]  James Noble,et al.  Factoring culture into the design of a persuasive game , 2006, OZCHI '06.

[20]  Winkler Tina,et al.  Receptiveness of Gamers to Embedded Brand Messages in Advergames , 2006 .

[21]  B. Silver Social Structure and Games , 1978 .

[22]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing User Interfaces for International Use , 1990 .

[23]  Albert N. Badre,et al.  The Effects of Cross Cultural Interface Design Orientation on World Wide Web User Performance , 2001 .

[24]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[25]  S. Shavitt,et al.  Issues and New Directions in Global Consumer Psychology , 2000 .

[26]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[27]  Richard Rouse,et al.  Game design : theory and practice , 2001 .

[28]  C. Airhihenbuwa,et al.  Cultural aspects of African American eating patterns. , 1996, Ethnicity & health.

[29]  Alvin W. Yeo,et al.  Global-software development lifecycle: an exploratory study , 2001, CHI.

[30]  Johan Redström Persuasive Design: Fringes and Foundations , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[31]  Philip Kotler,et al.  Social Marketing: Improving the Quality of Life , 2002 .

[32]  Jason Tester,et al.  The landscape of persuasive technologies , 1999, CACM.

[33]  Chris Crawford,et al.  Chris Crawford on Game Design , 2003 .

[34]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[35]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. , 1994 .

[36]  Romin W. Tafarodi,et al.  Individualism–collectivism, life events, and self‐esteem: a test of two trade‐offs , 1999 .

[37]  O. Holsti Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1969 .

[38]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[39]  E. W. Gould,et al.  Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design , 2000, INTR.

[40]  Carolyn A. Lin Cultural differences in message strategies: A comparison between American and Japanese TV , 1993 .

[41]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  ROBOTS AS SOCIAL ACTORS: AURORA AND THE CASE OF AUTISM , 1999 .

[42]  Muhammad Yunus,et al.  Banker to the poor : micro-lending and the battle against world poverty , 1999 .

[43]  Anne M. Brumbaugh,et al.  Nontarget Markets and Viewer Distinctiveness: The Impact of Target Marketing on Advertising Attitudes , 2000 .

[44]  James E. Haefner,et al.  Advertising in Contemporary Society: Perspectives Toward Understanding , 1986 .

[45]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Break the Habit! Designing an e-Therapy Intervention Using a Virtual Coach in Aid of Smoking Cessation , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[46]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  HandJive: a device for interpersonal haptic entertainment , 1998, CHI.

[47]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[48]  James Noble,et al.  Playing the interface: a case study of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas , 2006, OZCHI.

[49]  Henry Jenkins Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide , 2006 .

[50]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[51]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[52]  William J. Rapaport To think or not to think , 1988 .

[53]  Lu Wang,et al.  Effect of a Virtual Coach on Athletes' Motivation , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[54]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[55]  Tracy Fullerton,et al.  Game Design Workshop: Designing, Prototyping, and Playtesting Games , 2004 .

[56]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  Can Mixed Emotions Peacefully Coexist? , 2000 .