Applying Situation Awareness to Human-Machine Interface Design of Aviation

This paper discusses relationship between Situation Awareness and aviation accident, and proposed SA-oriented Design process for human-machine interface design. After some common designing principles, we discuss emphatically on the 10 levels of automation, and dynamic functional allocation that combines the human and machine generation is preferred.

[1]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Situation Awareness Oriented Design: From User's Cognitive Requirements to Creating Effective Supporting Technologies , 2003 .

[2]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness, A Critical Review , 2000 .

[3]  Marvin L. Thordsen,et al.  Decision Making in Complex Naval Command-and-Control Environments , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Situation Awareness in Aircraft Systems: Symposium Abstract , 1988 .

[5]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[6]  M R Endsley,et al.  Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[8]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[9]  Gary Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Complex Naval Command-and-Control Environments , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Situation Awareness and the Cognitive Management of Complex Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[11]  N. Moray,et al.  Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[12]  Martin L. Fracker.  A Theory of Situation Assessment: Implications for Measuring Situation Awareness , 1988 .