Synthesis of high flux forward osmosis membranes by chemically crosslinked layer-by-layer polyelectr

Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were successfully fabricated using layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly of poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH) and poly(sodium 4-styrene-sulfonate) (PSS) on a porous polyacrylonitrile (PAN) substrate. In addition, chemical crosslinking of LbL polyelectrolyte layers was performed with glutaraldehyde (GA). The resultant crosslinked (the xLbL series) and non-crosslinked (the LbL series) membranes were characterized in terms of the substrate morphology and structure, the separation layer water permeability and salt rejection, and the FO water flux and solute flux performance. Both LbL and xLbL membranes had relatively high water permeability (∼ or >7.0 L/m2 h bar). On the other hand, the crosslinked xLbL membranes showed better and more stable MgCl2 rejection, leading to a relatively low FO solute reverse transport (the solute flux over water flux ratio < 6 mM regardless of draw solution (DS) concentration and membrane orientation). High FO water fluxes were achieved for both crosslinked and non-crosslinked membranes, where a thin substrate with finger-like pores were adopted to minimize internal concentration polarization in the porous support layer. The crosslinked membrane xLbL3 (with 3 PAH/PSS deposition layers) had an FO water flux of ∼100 L/m2 h in the active-layer-facing-DS orientation using a 2 or 3 M MgCl2 draw solution and distilled water as the feed water, which clearly demonstrates the potential of LbL membranes for high flux FO applications.

[1]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: Membrane performance under elevated salt environment , 2011 .

[2]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and , 2011 .

[5]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2009 .

[6]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .

[7]  K. Petrotos,et al.  A study of the direct osmotic concentration of tomato juice in tubular membrane – module configuration. I. The effect of certain basic process parameters on the process performance , 1998 .

[8]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations , 2008 .

[9]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[10]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane , 2010 .

[11]  A. Deratani,et al.  Effect of LbL surface modification on characteristics and performances of cellulose acetate nanofiltration membranes , 2011 .

[12]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[13]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[14]  A. Bhowmick,et al.  Sulfonated Styrene-(ethylene-co-butylene)-styrene/Montmorillonite Clay Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Morphology, and Properties , 2007, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[15]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) , 2010 .

[16]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[17]  Rong Wang,et al.  Modeling salt accumulation in osmotic membrane bioreactors: Implications for FO membrane selection a , 2011 .

[18]  R. S. Norman,et al.  Osmotic power plants. , 1975, Science.

[19]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[20]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes , 2008 .

[21]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[22]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Kimberly L. Jones,et al.  Polyelectrolyte modification of nanofiltration membrane for selective removal of monovalent anions , 2011 .

[24]  Dezhong Xiao,et al.  The role of physical and chemical parameters on forward osmosis membrane fouling during algae separa , 2011 .

[25]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Manipulating the properties of coacervated polyelectrolyte microcapsules by chemical crosslinking , 2008 .

[27]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis , 1976 .

[28]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[29]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  Alain M. Jonas,et al.  Ultrathin polymer coatings by complexation of polyelectrolytes at interfaces: suitable materials, structure and properties , 2000 .

[31]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Boric acid permeation in forward osmosis membrane processes: modeling, experiments, and implications. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module , 2010 .

[33]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes applied in forward osmosis process , 2007 .

[34]  Zhanfeng Cui,et al.  A thermodynamic benchmark for assessing an emergency drinking water device based on forward osmosis , 2008 .

[35]  G. Bertolo,et al.  Present and future in process control and optimization of osmotic dehydration. From unit operation to innovative combined process: an overview. , 2004, Advances in food and nutrition research.

[36]  Emile R Cornelissen,et al.  Experimental studies and modeling on concentration polarization in forward osmosis. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[37]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents , 2010 .

[38]  Longzhen Zheng,et al.  Layer-by-layer assembly of PA-EDTA/PAH multilayer films and their potential-switchable electrochemistry , 2006 .

[39]  M. Coleman,et al.  Fourier transform ir studies of the degradation of polyacrylonitrile copolymers—I: Introduction and comparative rates of the degradation of three copolymers below 200°c and under reduced pressure , 1981 .

[40]  D.J.H. Harmsen,et al.  Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge , 2008 .

[41]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[42]  Stein Erik Skilhagen,et al.  Membrane processes in energy supply for an osmotic power plant , 2008 .

[43]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications , 2010 .

[44]  Rong Wang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[45]  Ho Kyong Shon,et al.  Physicochemical pretreatment of seawater: fouling reduction and membrane characterization , 2009 .

[46]  Guojun Zhang,et al.  Self-assembly of polyelectrolyte multilayer pervaporation membranes by a dynamic layer-by-layer technique on a hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane , 2007 .

[47]  G. Belfort,et al.  Surface modification of ultrafiltration membranes by low temperature plasma. I. Treatment of polyacrylonitrile , 1995 .

[48]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[49]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[50]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  A. Mohammad,et al.  Analysis of the Salt Retention of Nanofiltration Membranes Using the Donnan–Steric Partitioning Pore Model , 1999 .

[52]  Rong Wang,et al.  Fabrication of novel poly(amide–imide) forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with a positively charged nanofiltration-like selective layer , 2011 .

[53]  Lu Ouyang,et al.  Creation of functional membranes using polyelectrolyte multilayers and polymer brushes. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[54]  W. Liang,et al.  Synthesis and sulfonation of poly(arylene ether)s containing tetraphenyl methane moieties , 2004 .