Enhanced Rabies Surveillance Using a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test.

Laboratory-based surveillance is integral for rabies prevention, control and management efforts. While the DFA is the gold standard for rabies diagnosis, there is a need to validate additional diagnostic techniques to improve rabies surveillance, particularly in developing countries. Here, we present a standard protocol for the DRIT as an alternative, laboratory or field-based testing option that uses light microscopy as compared to the DFA. Touch impressions of brain tissue collected from suspect animals are fixed in 10% buffered formalin. The DRIT uses rabies virus-specific monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies (conjugated to biotin), a streptavidin-peroxidase enzyme, and a chromogen reporter (such as acetyl 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole) to detect viral inclusions within infected tissue. In approximately 1 h, a brain tissue sample can be tested and interpreted by the DRIT. Evaluation of suspect animal brains tested from a variety of species in North America, Asia, Africa, and Europe have illustrated high sensitivity and specificity by the DRIT approaching 100% with results compared to DFA. Since 2005, the United States Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services (USDA WS) program has conducted large-scale enhanced rabies surveillance efforts using the DRIT to test >94,000 samples collected from wildlife in strategic rabies management areas. The DRIT provides a powerful, economical tool for rabies diagnosis that can be used by laboratorians and field biologists to improve current rabies surveillance, prevention and control programs globally.

[1]  C. Rupprecht,et al.  Additional Progress in the Development and Application of a Direct, Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for Rabies Diagnosis , 2018, Veterinary sciences.

[2]  Timothy P. Algeo,et al.  Enhanced Rabies Surveillance to Support Effective Oral Rabies Vaccination of Raccoons in the Eastern United States , 2017, Tropical medicine and infectious disease.

[3]  K. Middel,et al.  Incorporating Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Testing into Large-Scale Wildlife Rabies Surveillance , 2017, Tropical medicine and infectious disease.

[4]  C. Rupprecht,et al.  Comparison of Biotinylated Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in an Evaluation of a Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for the Routine Diagnosis of Rabies in Southern Africa , 2014, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[5]  D. Slate,et al.  Progress in the development of a direct rapid immunohistochemical test for diagnosing rabeies , 2014 .

[6]  Timothy P. Algeo,et al.  Oral Rabies Vaccination in North America: Opportunities, Complexities, and Challenges , 2009, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[7]  C. Rupprecht,et al.  Rabies Diagnosis for Developing Countries , 2008, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[8]  S. Cleaveland,et al.  Evaluation of a Direct, Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for Rabies Diagnosis , 2006, Emerging infectious diseases.

[9]  E. Fèvre,et al.  Estimating the Public Health Impact of Rabies , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[10]  A. Haque,et al.  Touch Impression Cytology Versus Frozen Section as Intraoperative Consultation Diagnosis , 2004 .

[11]  M. Briscoe Laboratory Techniques in Rabies , 1957 .