Foam effect on the sea surface emissivity in the 8–14 μm region

[1] The effect of foam on the sea surface emission has been studied in the microwave region, but its effect on thermal infrared emissivity and temperature has not been sufficiently analyzed in the literature. This paper presents thermal infrared measurements of foam-covered seawaters carried out under controlled conditions using a multichannel radiometer working in the 8–14 μm region. The experimental data show a negligible foam effect at low observation angles but a significant increase of emissivity with foam at angles above 45°. Differences between foam and foam-free emissivities are about +0.04 for observation angles of 65°, depending slightly on the radiometric spectral band. The effect of foam is to reduce the angular variation of seawater emissivity. The foam and foam-free emissivity differences yield to differences up to 2.5 K in terms of sea surface temperature (SST), even larger than 1.2 K when the SST is retrieved from satellite using a split window technique. The correction of the foam effect on emissivity could be performed using an estimate of the fraction of sea covered by foam. This correction could improve the SST retrieval, mainly for measurements at large observation angles.

[1]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  Cool‐skin and warm‐layer effects on sea surface temperature , 1996 .

[2]  M. Konda,et al.  Measurement of the sea surface emissivity , 1994 .

[3]  K. I. Kondratʹev Radiation in the atmosphere , 1969 .

[4]  Ramon Villarino,et al.  Sea surface emissivity observations at L-band: first results of the Wind and Salinity Experiment WISE 2000 , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  D. García,et al.  On the steric and mass‐induced contributions to the annual sea level variations in the Mediterranean Sea , 2006 .

[6]  Ramon Villarino,et al.  The emissivity of foam-covered water surface at L-band: theoretical modeling and experimental results from the FROG 2003 field experiment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  C. Donlon,et al.  Toward Improved Validation of Satellite Sea Surface Skin Temperature Measurements for Climate Research , 2002 .

[8]  Froman Marks,et al.  Marine aerosols and whitecaps in the North Atlantic and greenland sea regions , 1987 .

[9]  Edward C. Monahan,et al.  Optimal Power-Law Description of Oceanic Whitecap Coverage Dependence on Wind Speed , 1980 .

[10]  A. Marsouin,et al.  Definition of a radiosounding database for sea surface brightness temperature simulations: Application to sea surface temperature retrieval algorithm determination , 2002 .

[11]  P. Forget,et al.  Analysis of the Variations of the Whitecap Fraction as Measured in a Coastal Zone , 2004 .

[12]  Enric Valor,et al.  Determination of sea surface temperature at large observation angles using an angular and emissivity-dependent split-window equation , 2007 .

[13]  Christopher J. Merchant,et al.  Direct observations of skin‐bulk SST variability , 2000 .

[14]  Ferris Webster,et al.  Whitecap coverage from satellite measurements: A first step toward modeling the variability of oceanic whitecaps , 2006 .

[15]  E. Monahan Occurrence and Evolution of Acoustically Relevant Sub-Surface Bubble Plumes and their Associated, Remotely Monitorable, Surface Whitecaps , 1993 .

[16]  Eva Rubio,et al.  Emissivity measurements of several soils and vegetation types in the 8–14, μm Wave band: Analysis of two field methods , 1997 .

[17]  V. Caselles,et al.  A split‐window algorithm for land surface temperature from advanced very high resolution radiometer data: Validation and algorithm comparison , 1997 .

[18]  César Coll,et al.  Analysis of the atmospheric and emissivity influence on the splitwindow equation for sea surface temperature , 1994 .

[19]  D. M. Doyle,et al.  Whitecaps and Global Fluxes , 1986 .

[20]  Larry M. McMillin,et al.  Estimation of sea surface temperatures from two infrared window measurements with different absorption , 1975 .

[21]  David K. Woolf,et al.  Comments on “Variations of Whitecap Coverage with Wind stress and Water Temperature , 1989 .

[22]  Ian J. Barton,et al.  Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures-A Comparison between Operational, Theoretical, and Experimental Algorithms , 1992 .

[23]  P Koepke,et al.  Effective reflectance of oceanic whitecaps. , 1984, Applied optics.

[24]  William J. Emery,et al.  The Behavior of the Bulk – Skin Sea Surface Temperature Difference under Varying Wind Speed and Heat Flux , 1996 .

[25]  Roger Saunders,et al.  Theoretical algorithms for satellite‐derived sea surface temperatures , 1989 .

[26]  Michaël Sicard,et al.  A High-Accuracy Multiwavelength Radiometer for In Situ Measurements in the Thermal Infrared. Part I: Characterization of the Instrument , 2000 .

[27]  X. Wu,et al.  Emissivity of rough sea surface for 8-13 num: modeling and verification. , 1997, Applied optics.

[28]  Luis Enrique,et al.  The WISE 2000 and 2001 field experiments in support of the SMOS mission: sea surface L-band brightness temperature observations and their application to sea surface salinity retrieval , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Philip D. Watts,et al.  Wind Speed Effects on Sea Surface Emission and Reflection for the Along Track Scanning Radiometer , 1996 .

[30]  Malgorzata Stramska,et al.  Observations of oceanic whitecaps in the north polar waters of the Atlantic , 2003 .

[31]  Eva Rubio,et al.  Autonomous Measurements of Sea Surface Temperature Using In Situ Thermal Infrared Data , 2004 .

[32]  John W. Salisbury,et al.  Thermal infrared remote sensing of crude oil slicks , 1993 .

[33]  Enric Valor,et al.  In situ angular measurements of thermal infrared sea surface emissivity—Validation of models , 2005 .

[34]  Jeffrey L. Hanson,et al.  Wind Sea Growth and Dissipation in the Open Ocean , 1999 .