A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-Based Brush Cytology for Tissue Diagnosis in Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Background and objective Patients with suspected malignant biliary strictures frequently undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based brush cytology and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for establishing the diagnosis. The outcomes of these tests aid in the further management of the patient. A comparison of these two modalities in establishing the diagnosis is seldom reported. In light of this, we aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy between ERCP-based brush cytology and EUS-FNA for tissue diagnosis in malignant biliary obstruction. Our study involved a retrospective audit of all patients admitted to the Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre for EUS and ERCP from 2015 to 2019. Methodology A Comparative study was conducted in the Department of Medical Gastroenterology at the Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre over a five-year period. A total of 77 subjects who presented during the study period with biliary obstruction based on clinical presentation with altered liver function test in an obstructive pattern and evidence of biliary obstruction in the form of stricture or pancreaticobiliary mass on cross-sectional imaging were included in the study. All the patients included in the study underwent EUS and ERCP. Results The majority of the patients in the study were in the fifth decade of life with a slight female predominance. The most common CT finding was a periampullary mass with common bile duct (CBD) stricture (59.7%). In the study, EUS-FNA was more sensitive than ERCP-based tissue sampling. The overall sensitivity was 90.63% for EUS-FNA and 65.63% for ERCP sampling. EUS-FNA was found to have diagnostic accuracy of 92.63% in comparison to 71.43% for brush cytology. Conclusions Based on our findings, EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling with excellent sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. Performing EUS before ERCP in all patients with suspected malignant biliary obstruction would definitely improve diagnostic accuracy and thereby help in the management of such cases.

[1]  Dong Ki Lee,et al.  International consensus statements for endoscopic management of distal biliary stricture , 2019, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[2]  R. Soetikno,et al.  Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study , 2019, Endoscopy International Open.

[3]  Kenneth J. Chang,et al.  A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device. , 2019 .

[4]  F. Itoh,et al.  Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Bile Cytology Using a Newly Designed Biliary Scraper for Biliary Strictures , 2018, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[5]  J. Telford,et al.  A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions , 2018, Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[6]  C. Létoublon,et al.  Performance of bile aspiration plus brushing to diagnose malignant biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography , 2016, Endoscopy International Open.

[7]  B. Boulay,et al.  Malignant biliary obstruction: From palliation to treatment. , 2016, World journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[8]  A. Gelrud,et al.  Biliary strictures: diagnostic considerations and approach , 2014, Gastroenterology report.

[9]  K. Binmoeller,et al.  EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study. , 2014, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[10]  S. Munigala,et al.  Patients With Obstructive Jaundice and Biliary Stricture±Mass Lesion on Imaging: Prevalence of Malignancy and Potential Role of EUS-FNA , 2013, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[11]  H. Pitt,et al.  Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  D. Raine,et al.  EUS-FNA versus biliary brushings and assessment of simultaneous performance in jaundiced patients with suspected malignant obstruction. , 2010, JOP : Journal of the pancreas.

[13]  J. Leblanc,et al.  EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results. , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[14]  A. Meining,et al.  ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  S. Sherman,et al.  Endoscopic UltrasonographyGuided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Suspected Pancreatic Cancer , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.