Control of the contents of working memory--a comparison of two paradigms and two age groups.

Two experiments investigated whether young and old adults can temporarily remove information from a capacity-limited central component of working memory (WM) into another component, the activated part of long-term memory (LTM). Experiment 1 used a modified Sternberg recognition task (S. Sternberg, 1969); Experiment 2 used an arithmetic memory-updating task. In both paradigms, participants memorized 2 lists, one of which was cued as temporarily irrelevant. Removal of the irrelevant list from capacity-limited WM was indexed by the disappearance of list-length effects of that list on latencies for concurrent processing tasks. Young adults could outsource the irrelevant list within 2-3 s and retrieve it back into the central part of WM later. Old adults showed the same flexibility in the arithmetic updating task but seemed somewhat less able or inclined to temporarily move information into the activated part of LTM in the modified Sternberg task.

[1]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Increases in Intrusion Errors and Working Memory Deficit of Poor Comprehenders , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Selective attention to elements in working memory. , 2003, Experimental psychology.

[3]  Paola Palladino,et al.  Intrusion errors in working memory tasks , 2000 .

[4]  S. Breckler.  Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: cause for concern? , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Age differences in working memory— The roles of storage and selective access , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[6]  L. Siegel,et al.  Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[9]  Herbert Hagendorf,et al.  The Role of Task Context for Component Processes in Focus Switching , 2002 .

[10]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[11]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  N. Cowan.  An embedded-processes model of working memory , 1999 .

[13]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[14]  L Hasher,et al.  Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. , 1999 .

[16]  K. Oberauer.  Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  J. Cerella.  Information processing rates in the elderly. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  G. Mandler.  Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[19]  The nature and timing of the retrieval process and of interference effects. , 1981 .

[20]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Beyond resources: Formal models of complexity effects and age differences in working memory , 2001 .

[21]  K. Oberauer.  Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Trey Hedden,et al.  Contributions of source and inhibitory mechanisms to age-related retroactive interference in verbal working memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Serial attention within working memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[24]  E. Maylor,et al.  Rejecting the dull hypothesis : the relation between method and theory in cognitive aging research , 2000 .

[25]  K. Oberauer.  Removing irrelevant information from working memory: a cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  G. Radvansky,et al.  Studies of directed forgetting in older adults. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  S. Sternberg.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[29]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[30]  A. Baddeley.  Is working memory still working , 2001 .

[31]  Elizabeth A. Maylor,et al.  Models of Cognitive Aging , 2000 .

[32]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .