Sequence and structural features of the T‐fold, an original tunnelling building unit

A similar fold has been found in four archetype enzymes that perform different functions. This new fold has been named the T‐fold because it is found in multimeric proteins crossed by a tunnel. The T‐fold consists of an antiparallel β‐sheet of four sequential strands, and two antiparallel helices between the second and third strand, layered on the concave side of the β‐sheet. The presently known T‐fold proteins share a high structural similarity (a mean of 1.4 Å root mean square (r.m.s.) deviation on the common core) while they only exhibit a low level of sequence identity (a mean of 10.5% on the aligned regions). They bind to substrates belonging to the purine or pterin families, and share a fold‐related binding site with a glutamate or glutamine residue anchoring the substrate and a lot of conserved interactions. They also share a similar oligomerization mode: several T‐folds join together to form a β2nαn barrel, then two barrels join together in a head‐to‐head fashion to made up the native enzymes. The T‐fold has the characteristics of a globular domain, with a hydrophobic core and a clearly defined topohydrophobic network. It defines a new class of common folds or recurrent domains found in distantly related proteins. However, it is likely not stable in monomeric form and until now is only observed in association with other T‐folds through multimerization. Proteins 2000;39:142–154. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S. Steinbacher,et al.  7,8-DIHYDRONEOPTERIN TRIPHOSPHATE EPIMERASE , 2000 .

[2]  Anne Poupon,et al.  Predicting the protein folding nucleus from a sequence , 1999, FEBS letters.

[3]  Ruben Recabarren,et al.  Estimating the total number of protein folds , 1999, Proteins.

[4]  S. Steinbacher,et al.  Crystal structure of 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate epimerase. , 1999, Structure.

[5]  Patrice Gouet,et al.  ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript , 1999, Bioinform..

[6]  A. Poupon,et al.  “Topohydrophobic positions” as key markers of globular protein folds , 1999 .

[7]  E. Shakhnovich.  Folding by association , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[8]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Mechanism of folding and assembly of a small tetrameric protein domain from tumor suppressor p53 , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[9]  James E. Bray,et al.  The CATH Database provides insights into protein structure/function relationships , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  Claire O'Donovan,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL in 1999 , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  C DeLisi,et al.  Estimating the number of protein folds. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  A. Poupon,et al.  Populations of hydrophobic amino acids within protein globular domains: Identification of conserved “topohydrophobic” positions , 1998, Proteins.

[13]  David C. Jones,et al.  Contemporary approaches to protein structure classification , 1998, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[14]  C Sander,et al.  Dictionary of recurrent domains in protein structures , 1998, Proteins.

[15]  Z. X. Wang,et al.  A re-estimation for the total numbers of protein folds and superfamilies. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[16]  C. Orengo,et al.  Protein folds and functions. , 1998, Structure.

[17]  A. Murzin.  How far divergent evolution goes in proteins. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[18]  M. Page,et al.  Crystal structure and reaction mechanism of 7,8-dihydroneopterin aldolase from staphylococcus aureus , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Profile hidden Markov models , 1998, Bioinform..

[20]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  T. Prangé,et al.  Crystal Structure of the protein drug urate oxidase-inhibitor complex at 2.05 Å resolution , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[22]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  G. Labesse,et al.  Deciphering protein sequence information through hydrophobic cluster analysis (HCA): current status and perspectives , 1997, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[24]  Joël Pothier,et al.  P-SEA: a new efficient assignment of secondary structure from C alpha trace of proteins , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[25]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Two new examples of protein structural similarities within the structure-function twilight zone. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[26]  A G Murzin,et al.  Distant homology recognition using structural classification of proteins , 1997, Proteins.

[27]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  H. Nar.  GTP Cyclohydrolase I , 1996 .

[29]  C Sander,et al.  Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.

[30]  J F Gibrat,et al.  Surprising similarities in structure comparison. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[31]  C. Chothia,et al.  Understanding protein structure: using scop for fold interpretation. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[32]  R. Huber,et al.  Active site topology and reaction mechanism of GTP cyclohydrolase I. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  C. Heizmann,et al.  6-Pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin synthase, an enzyme with a novel type of active site involving both zinc binding and an intersubunit catalytic triad motif; site-directed mutagenesis of the proposed active center, characterization of the metal binding site and modelling of substrate binding. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  R. Huber,et al.  Atomic structure of GTP cyclohydrolase I. , 1995, Structure.

[35]  G. Farber,et al.  The structure and evolution of a/β barrel proteins , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[36]  David T. Jones,et al.  Protein superfamilles and domain superfolds , 1994, Nature.

[37]  C. Heizmann,et al.  Three‐dimensional structure of 6‐pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin synthase, an enzyme involved in tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[38]  J. Tainer,et al.  Human CksHs2 atomic structure: a role for its hexameric assembly in cell cycle control. , 1993, Science.

[39]  A. Murzin.  OB(oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding)‐fold: common structural and functional solution for non‐homologous sequences. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[40]  J. Marsh,et al.  The GTPase superfamily , 1993 .

[41]  Alexey G. Murzin,et al.  β-Trefoil fold: Patterns of structure and sequence in the Kunitz inhibitors interleukins-1β and 1α and fibroblast growth factors , 1992 .

[42]  A. Lesk,et al.  beta-Trefoil fold. Patterns of structure and sequence in the Kunitz inhibitors interleukins-1 beta and 1 alpha and fibroblast growth factors. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  Alexey G. Murzin.  Familiar Strangers , 2019, Twelve Weeks to Change a Life.

[44]  P. Kraulis.  A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[45]  Frank McCormick,et al.  The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism , 1991, Nature.

[46]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[47]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.