Safety Climate in Construction Industry: A Case Study in Hong Kong

Because of the characteristics of decentralization and mobility in the construction industry, safety culture is crucially important. A comprehensive safety climate questionnaire survey was conducted with all sites and employees of a leading construction company and its subcontractors in Hong Kong. In total, 4,719 records were returned from 54 sites. By means of factor analysis, a 15-factor structure that defines the dimensions of the safety climate has been extracted. Compared with previous research studies, the roles and influences of fellow workers, and safety resources on the safety climate are emphasized. The results also confirm the feasibility of exploring common factors of the safety climate in the construction industry. Through further analysis, logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between the safety climate and personal characteristics. Statistically significant relationships were found between safety climate and personal characteristics, including gender, marital status, education level, number of family members to support, safety knowledge, drinking habits, direct employer, and individual safety behavior. This research is a case study and the results are derived from the data of one company, but the methodology of this research may be useful as a model for further research, and the findings may provide useful information for construction managers and safety practitioners in the construction industry to improve their safety culture.

[1]  Taeki Lee,et al.  Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations , 2000 .

[2]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  SAFETY CLIMATE IN CONSTRUCTION SITE ENVIRONMENTS , 2002 .

[3]  F. Guldenmund.  The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[4]  Aleck Ian Glendon,et al.  Safety climate factors, group differences and safety behaviour in road construction , 2001 .

[5]  Michael O'Toole,et al.  The relationship between employees' perceptions of safety and organizational culture. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[6]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  Corporate Assessment: Auditing a Company's Personality , 1993 .

[7]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Systems Model of Construction Accident Causation , 2005 .

[8]  Ann Williamson,et al.  The development of a measure of safety climate: The role of safety perceptions and attitudes , 1997 .

[9]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues , 1978 .

[10]  Daniel Fong,et al.  Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites , 1999 .

[11]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Assessing the state of organizational safety—culture or climate? , 1999 .

[12]  D. Zohar.  Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Nicole Dedobbeleer,et al.  Is risk perception one of the dimensions of safety climate , 1998 .

[14]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[15]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments , 2003 .

[16]  Oi-ling Siu,et al.  Age differences in safety attitudes and safety performance in Hong Kong construction workers. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[17]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[18]  Jae-on Kim,et al.  Introduction to Factor Analysis , 1978 .

[19]  A. Glendon,et al.  Perspectives on safety culture , 2000 .

[20]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features☆ , 2000 .

[21]  Ciencias Sociales,et al.  Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[22]  Alistair Cheyne,et al.  Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. , 2000 .

[23]  A. Neal,et al.  The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior , 2000 .

[24]  William Eugene Tarrants,et al.  The measurement of safety performance , 1980 .