Characterization of Nomex honeycomb core constituent material mechanical properties

Abstract Nomex honeycomb cores have been widely used in composite sandwich panels. To accomplish meso-scale finite element modeling of these cores, cell wall mechanical properties are required, for which limited data are available. In this work, tensile testing was performed on Nomex paper, phenolic resin, and Nomex paper coated with phenolic resin. Flatwise tension and compression tests were also performed on two types of Nomex honeycomb cores. Test results were calibrated in finite element modeling to account for strain gage local stiffening effects and thickness normalization. Identified cell wall material properties were implemented in a honeycomb core finite element model and further calibrated by matching simulation results to manufacturer test data. The cells’ double-wall thickness was also adjusted. These calibrations and adjustments led to an exact simulation match with test data. Numerically matching cell wall material properties depends on modeling sophistication and is subject to core test result variability and core construction differences among manufacturers.

[1]  Sebastian Heimbs,et al.  Virtual testing of sandwich core structures using dynamic finite element simulations , 2009 .

[2]  Marco Giglio,et al.  Investigations on sandwich core properties through an experimental–numerical approach , 2012 .

[3]  Jin-Hwe Kweon,et al.  Failure characteristics of carbon/BMI-Nomex sandwich joints in various hygrothermal conditions , 2014 .

[4]  Alastair Johnson,et al.  Numerical modelling of honeycomb core crush behaviour , 2008 .

[5]  Alastair Johnson,et al.  Mechanical tests for foldcore base material properties , 2009 .

[6]  L. F. Silva,et al.  Measurement of the mechanical properties of structural adhesives in tension and shear over a wide range of temperatures , 2005 .

[7]  Y. Tsujii,et al.  Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Aramid Honeycomb Core. Investigation on the Compression Strength and the Shear Modulus. , 1995 .

[8]  Jin-Hwe Kweon,et al.  An experimental study of the insert joint strength of composite sandwich structures , 2008 .

[9]  Wilfried Becker,et al.  Effective stress-strain relations for two-dimensional cellular sandwich cores: Homogenization, material models, and properties , 2002 .

[10]  Jong-Shin Huang,et al.  Numerical analysis of the stiffness and strength of regular hexagonal honeycombs with plateau borders , 2004 .

[11]  J. Choi,et al.  Meso-scale finite element modeling of NomexTM honeycomb cores , 2014 .

[12]  K. Turan,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Critical Buckling Load of Honeycomb Sandwich Panels , 2010 .

[13]  B. Castanié,et al.  Experimental Analysis and Modeling of the Crushing of Honeycomb Cores , 2005 .

[14]  Robert J. Young,et al.  Compressive properties of aramid fibres , 1997 .

[15]  B. Redjel.  Mechanical properties and fracture toughness of phenolic resin , 1995 .

[16]  A. Prota,et al.  Numerical assessment of the impact behavior of honeycomb sandwich structures , 2013 .

[17]  R. A. Staal,et al.  Failure of sandwich honeycomb panels in bending , 2006 .

[18]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The out-of-plane properties of honeycombs , 1992 .

[19]  Sebastian Heimbs,et al.  Failure behaviour of honeycomb sandwich corner joints and inserts , 2009 .

[20]  K. Santaoja,et al.  Simulation experiments on the effective in-plane compliance of the honeycomb materials , 2013 .

[21]  W. Szewczyk.  Determination of Poisson’s Ratio in the Plane of the Paper , 2008 .

[22]  Scaling of honeycomb compressive yield stresses , 2000 .

[23]  Gin Boay Chai,et al.  Mechanical properties of Nomex material and Nomex honeycomb structure , 2007 .

[24]  Jong-Shin Huang,et al.  Elastic buckling of hexagonal honeycombs with dual imperfections , 2008 .

[25]  Gin Boay Chai,et al.  A model to predict low-velocity impact response and damage in sandwich composites , 2008 .

[26]  Claudio Sbarufatti,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigations of low velocity impact on sandwich panels , 2013 .

[27]  M. Giglio,et al.  Numerical investigation of a three point bending test on sandwich panels with aluminum skins and Nomex™ honeycomb core , 2012 .

[28]  W. F. Schmidt,et al.  Determination of Young's modulus of thin films used in embedded passive devices , 1997, 1997 Proceedings 47th Electronic Components and Technology Conference.

[29]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Statistical finite element analysis of the buckling behavior of honeycomb structures , 2013 .

[30]  Tau Tyan,et al.  Quasi-static crush behavior of aluminum honeycomb specimens under non-proportional compression-dominant combined loads , 2006 .

[31]  Jin-Hwe Kweon,et al.  Testing and modeling of Nomex™ honeycomb sandwich Panels with bolt insert , 2014 .

[32]  Gerald Kress,et al.  Honeycomb sandwich residual stress deformation pattern , 2009 .

[33]  J. Seferis,et al.  Evaluations of an aramid fiber in nonwoven processes for honeycomb applications , 2002 .