The Impact of Flow in an EEG-based Brain Computer Interface

Major issues in Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) include low usability and poor user performance. This paper tackles them by ensuring the users to be in a state of immersion, control and motivation, called state of flow. Indeed, in various disciplines, being in the state of flow was shown to improve performances and learning. Hence, we intended to draw BCI users in a flow state to improve both their subjective experience and their performances. In a Motor Imagery BCI game, we manipulated flow in two ways: 1) by adapting the task difficulty and 2) by using background music. Results showed that the difficulty adaptation induced a higher flow state, however music had no effect. There was a positive correlation between subjective flow scores and offline performance, although the flow factors had no effect (adaptation) or negative effect (music) on online performance. Overall, favouring the flow state seems a promising approach for enhancing users' satisfaction, although its complexity requires more thorough investigations.

[1]  Matthew R. G. Brown,et al.  Flow Maximization as a Guide to Optimizing Performance: A Computational Model , 2012 .

[2]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[3]  M. Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Biased feedback in brain-computer interfaces , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  David Coyle,et al.  Gamification of Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: A Systematic Review of Applications and Efficacy , 2016, JMIR serious games.

[5]  C. Karageorghis,et al.  The effects of synchronous music on 400-m sprint performance , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  A. Kübler,et al.  Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain–computer interface use , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  Ian Maynard,et al.  Effects of asynchronous music on flow states and shooting performance among netball players , 2003 .

[8]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[9]  Guy Madison,et al.  Proneness for psychological flow in everyday life : associations with personality and intelligence , 2012 .

[10]  Christian Mühl,et al.  Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous Brain-Computer Interfaces: lessons learned from instructional design , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  C. Harwood,et al.  Pre-competition imagery and music: The impact on flow and performance in competitive soccer. , 2011 .

[12]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Games for BCI Skill Learning , 2015 .

[13]  A. LaGasse,et al.  Rhythm, movement, and autism: using rhythmic rehabilitation research as a model for autism , 2013, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[14]  Emmanuel Maby Technical Requirements for High‐quality EEG Acquisition , 2016 .

[15]  J. Webster,et al.  The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions. , 1993 .

[16]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Game elements improve performance in a working memory training task , 2015, Int. J. Serious Games.

[17]  Jarrod Had MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package , 2010 .

[18]  C. Karageorghis,et al.  Psychological Effects of Music Tempi during Exercise , 2007, International journal of sports medicine.

[19]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[20]  B. Skinner,et al.  The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis , 2016 .

[21]  Costas I. Karageorghis,et al.  Ergogenic and psychological effects of synchronous music during circuit-type exercise , 2010 .

[22]  Adam M. Croom Music practice and participation for psychological well-being: A review of how music influences positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment , 2015 .

[23]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Zhilin Zhang,et al.  Evolving Signal Processing for Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  P. Terry,et al.  Development and initial validation of an instrument to assess the motivational qualities of music in exercise and sport: the Brunel Music Rating Inventory. , 1999, Journal of sports sciences.

[26]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  How does multiple testing correction work? , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Rémi Bachelet,et al.  The EduFlow Model: A Contribution Toward the Study of Optimal Learning Environments , 2016 .

[28]  Ricardo Ron-Angevin,et al.  Brain–computer interface: Changes in performance using virtual reality techniques , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  Wei Liao,et al.  Musical Training Induces Functional Plasticity in Perceptual and Motor Networks: Insights from Resting-State fMRI , 2012, PloS one.

[30]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[32]  Francisco J. Martínez-López,et al.  Modelling students' flow experiences in an online learning environment , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Sun I. Kim,et al.  Neurofeedback Training with Virtual Reality for Inattention and Impulsiveness , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[34]  M. Anshel,et al.  Effect of music and rhythm on physical performance. , 1978, Research quarterly.

[35]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Predicting Mental Imagery-Based BCI Performance from Personality, Cognitive Profile and Neurophysiological Patterns , 2015, PloS one.

[36]  Jarrod D. Hadfield,et al.  MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models , 2010 .

[37]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Multi-Armed Bandits for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2013, EDM.

[38]  J. Keller Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design , 1987 .