Entomopter Manoeuvrability Enhancement by Deformations Control of Flexible Flapping Wings

§In the background of preparing this paper lies our believe that transferring ideas from the more matured disciple like aircraft technology to emerging animal technology should be beneficial for the later one and vice-versa. One integrated idea, of special interest to both disciplines, is the active flexible wing concept. This concept represents a return to the Wright Brothers’ idea of wing warping or twisting by combining wing structures and flight controls to perform the desired manoeuvres. It is well known that the dynamics of entomopter over the flight envelope is highly nonlinear. The character of the loads acting on the vehicle particularly the aerodynamics - vary substantially over the angle of attack operating range (which may nowadays include post stall incidences). The control of this type of plant can be achieved adequately via a variety of approaches, provided that the parameters of the controller (the gains in particular) are scheduled with flight condition. The nonlinearity of the system makes it difficult to implement a strategy of interpolating between gains derived from a few choice trim points. This is because the plant and the controller interact such that it is not clear precisely what the closed loop trim points are in vide flight regions, because aerodynamic loads often become asymmetric and where inertial coupling is significant. In theis paper we developed aeroelastic analysis for a flexible wing for an imposed harmonic flapping motion about the root chord of the wing. A Matlab code was written based on the analysis. This code was used to find the average lift and thrust of a wing of known aerodynamic and structural properties. The results compared well with the published results.

[1]  John C. Houbolt,et al.  Differential equations of motion for combined flapwise bending, chordwise bending, and torsion of twisted nonuniform rotor blades , 1957 .

[2]  John W. Edwards,et al.  Active Flutter Control Using Generalized Unsteady Aerodynamic Theory , 1978 .

[3]  Jerry R. Newsom,et al.  Control Law Synthesis for Active Flutter Suppression Using Optimal Control Theory , 1979 .

[4]  C. R. Stone,et al.  Control Law Synthesis for Flutter Suppression Using Linear Quadratic Gaussian Theory , 1981 .

[5]  D. M. Henderson Recursive relationships for body axis rotation rates , 1983 .

[6]  R. Wootton,et al.  WING SHAPE AND FLIGHT BEHAVIOUR IN BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA: PAPILIONOIDEA AND HESPERIOIDEA): A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS , 1988 .

[7]  G. Rüppell Kinematic Analysis of Symmetrical Flight Manoeuvres of Odonata , 1989 .

[8]  R. Wootton The functional morphology of the wings of Odonata , 1991 .

[9]  R. Wootton FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF INSECT WINGS , 1992 .

[10]  J. D. DeLaurier,et al.  The development of an efficient ornithopter wing , 1993, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[11]  Dean T. Mook,et al.  Numerical simulations of flutter and its suppression by active control , 1992 .

[12]  R. Wootton Leading edge section and asymmetric twisting in the wings of flying butterflies (Insecta, Papilionoidea) , 1993 .

[13]  J. D. Delaurier,et al.  An aerodynamic model for flapping-wing flight , 1993, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[14]  I. Gursul,et al.  Active control of vortex breakdown over delta wings , 1994 .

[15]  William E. Faller,et al.  Neural network prediction and control of three-dimensional unsteady separated flowfields , 1995 .

[16]  Vivek Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Flutter suppression control law design and testing for the active flexible wing , 1995 .

[17]  Tobalske,et al.  Flight kinematics of black-billed magpies and pigeons over a wide range of speeds , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  Robert L. Clark,et al.  Active Control of Panel Flutter with Piezoelectric Transducers , 1996 .

[19]  Leonard Kleinrock,et al.  Using Finite State Automata to Produce Self-Optimization and Self-Control , 1996, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[20]  Kenneth B. Lazarus,et al.  Multivariable active lifting surface control using strain actuation : Analytical and experimental results , 1997 .

[21]  J. Pietrucha,et al.  Modified panel methods with examples of applications to unsteady and nonlinear flowfield calculations , 1998 .

[22]  J. Narkiewicz,et al.  Elastic structure modelling of composite rotorcraft blade for active modification of dynamic characteristics , 1999 .

[23]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Evolving strategies for active flow control , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[24]  Magdalena D. Bugajska,et al.  Co-Evolution of Form and Function in the Design of Autonomous Agents: Micro Air Vehicle Project , 2000 .

[25]  Michele Milano,et al.  A clustering genetic algorithm for actuator optimization in flow control , 2000, Proceedings. The Second NASA/DoD Workshop on Evolvable Hardware.

[26]  K. Sibilski,et al.  Can modern rotorcraft aeromechanics help to design entomopter propulsion , 2000 .

[27]  Krzysztof Sibilski,et al.  Analogies between rotary and flapping wings from control theory point of view , 2001 .

[28]  Krzysztof Sibilski,et al.  Modelling of aerodynamic forces on flapping wings - questions and results , 2001 .

[29]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamics and flow control for flapping wing flyers , 2003 .

[30]  T. Daniel,et al.  The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 2979-2987 © 2003 The Company of Biologists Ltd , 2022 .

[31]  T. Daniel,et al.  The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 2989-2997 © 2003 The Company of Biologists Ltd , 2003 .

[32]  Wen-Bin Young,et al.  The thrust and lift of an ornithopter's membrane wings with simple flapping motion , 2006 .

[33]  D. Pines,et al.  Challenges Facing Future Micro-Air-Vehicle Development , 2006 .

[34]  R. Wootton Support and deformability in insect wings , 2009 .

[35]  C. R. Betts Functioning of the wings and axillary sclerites of Heteroptera during flight , 2009 .