Interseismic Coupling beneath the Sikkim-Bhutan Himalaya Constrained by GPS Measurements and Its Implication for Strain Segmentation and Seismic Activity

The Sikkim–Bhutan seismic gap has witnessed a long earthquake quiescence since the 1714 M7.5~8.5 earthquake. The state of stress accumulation beneath the Sikkim–Bhutan Himalaya and its spatial correlation with seismicity remains unclear due to the lack of geodetic measurements and the low levels of seismic activity. We compile Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements in southern Tibet with the available velocities in the Sikkim–Bhutan Himalaya to reveal the characteristics of strain buildup on the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT). We correct non-tectonic hydrological loading effects in a GPS time series to accurately determine the Three-Dimensional (3D) velocities of each continuous station. Extensive GPS measurements yield convergence rates of 16.2~18.5 mm/y across the Sikkim–Bhutan Himalaya, which is quite consistent with that observed elsewhere in the Himalaya. Based on a double-ramp structure of the MHT, a refined 3D coupling image is inverted using a dense network of GPS velocities. The result indicates significant along-strike variations of fault coupling beneath the Sikkim–Bhutan Himalaya. The locking width (coupling > 0.5) of western Bhutan reaches ~100 km, which is 30~40% wider than Sikkim and eastern Bhutan. An obvious embayment of decoupling zone near the border between Sikkim and western Bhutan is recognized, and coincides spatially with the rupture terminates of the 1934 Mw8.2 and the 1714 M7.5~8.5 earthquakes, indicating that the large megathrust earthquakes along the Sikkim–Bhutan Himalaya are largely segmented by the spatial variation of frictional properties on the MHT. Using a new compilation of seismic records in the Sikkim–Bhutan Himalaya, we analyze the spatial correlation between fault coupling and seismic activity. The result suggests that the seismicity in the Bhutan Himalaya is broadly distributed, instead of restricted in the lower edge of the interseismic locking zone. This implies that the seismic activity in the Bhutan Himalaya is not uniquely controlled by the stress accumulation at the downdip end of the locked portion of the MHT.

[1]  J. Avouac,et al.  From Geodetic Imaging of Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip to Dynamic Modeling of the Seismic Cycle , 2015 .

[2]  Lin Ding,et al.  Convergence rate across the Nepal Himalaya and interseismic coupling on the Main Himalayan Thrust: Implications for seismic hazard , 2011 .

[3]  Pascal Willis,et al.  Plate Motion of India and Interseismic Strain in the Nepal Himalaya from GPS and DORIS Measurements , 2006 .

[4]  Jeffrey T. Freymueller,et al.  Seasonal and long-term vertical deformation in the Nepal Himalaya constrained by GPS and GRACE measurements , 2012 .

[5]  R. Armijo,et al.  Quaternary extension in southern Tibet: Field observations and tectonic implications , 1986 .

[6]  M. Ravi Kumar,et al.  Transverse Tectonics in the Sikkim Himalaya: Evidence from Seismicity and Focal-Mechanism Data , 2010 .

[7]  Zheng‐Kang Shen,et al.  Present‐Day Crustal Deformation of Continental China Derived From GPS and Its Tectonic Implications , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[8]  J. Avouac,et al.  Interseismic coupling on the main Himalayan thrust , 2015 .

[9]  Satoshi Miura,et al.  Slip distribution beneath the Central and Western Himalaya inferred from GPS observations , 2011 .

[10]  Kaihua Ding,et al.  Geodetic imaging mega-thrust coupling beneath the Himalaya , 2018, Tectonophysics.

[11]  V. Gahalaut,et al.  Low seismicity in the Bhutan Himalaya and the stress shadow of the 1897 Shillong Plateau earthquake , 2011 .

[12]  Akira Hasegawa,et al.  Interplate coupling beneath NE Japan inferred from three-dimensional displacement field , 2006 .

[13]  Vinod K. Gaur,et al.  Crustal structure of the Darjeeling—Sikkim Himalaya and southern Tibet , 2011 .

[14]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  Mountain Building, Erosion, and the Seismic Cycle in the Nepal Himalaya , 2003 .

[15]  Eric J. Fielding,et al.  Depth varying rupture properties during the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake , 2017 .

[16]  Kip V. Hodges,et al.  Variable shortening rates in the eastern Himalayan thrust belt, Bhutan: Insights from multiple thermochronologic and geochronologic data sets tied to kinematic reconstructions , 2012 .

[17]  V. Gahalaut,et al.  Possible influence of subducting ridges on the Himalayan arc and on the ruptures of great and major Himalayan earthquakes , 2012 .

[18]  Emma M. Hill,et al.  Structural Control on Downdip Locking Extent of the Himalayan Megathrust , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[19]  György Hetényi,et al.  The underthrusting Indian crust and its role in collision dynamics of the Eastern Himalaya in Bhutan: Insights from receiver function imaging , 2017 .

[20]  Xavier Collilieux,et al.  ITRF2008 plate motion model , 2011 .

[21]  Marie-Pierre Doin,et al.  Long-term growth of the Himalaya inferred from interseismic InSAR measurement , 2012 .

[22]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  On the use of dislocations to model interseismic strain and stress build-up at intracontinental thrust faults , 2001 .

[23]  Aaron A. Velasco,et al.  Using Small, Temporary Seismic Networks for Investigating Tectonic Deformation: Brittle Deformation and Evidence for Strike-Slip Faulting in Bhutan , 2007 .

[24]  Bertrand Meyer,et al.  Oblique Stepwise Rise and Growth of the Tibet Plateau , 2001, Science.

[25]  Kaihua Ding,et al.  Interseismic Coupling in the Central Nepalese Himalaya: Spatial Correlation with the 2015 Mw 7.9 Gorkha Earthquake , 2019, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[26]  Roland Bürgmann,et al.  Intraplate deformation of the Indian subcontinent , 2008 .

[27]  R. Dill,et al.  Numerical simulations of global‐scale high‐resolution hydrological crustal deformations , 2013 .

[28]  John McCloskey,et al.  Interseismic coupling, stress evolution, and earthquake slip on the Sunda megathrust , 2013 .

[29]  Brendan J. Meade,et al.  Block models of crustal motion in southern California constrained by GPS measurements , 2005 .

[30]  David Mencin,et al.  Implications for elastic energy storage in the Himalaya from the Gorkha 2015 earthquake and other incomplete ruptures of the Main Himalayan Thrust , 2017 .

[31]  J. Freymueller,et al.  GPS measurements of present-day convergence across the Nepal Himalaya , 1997, Nature.

[32]  Federica Riguzzi,et al.  Estimates of motion and strain rates across active faults in the frontal part of eastern Himalayas in North Bengal from GPS measurements , 2009 .

[33]  Ian Parsons,et al.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1986 .

[34]  Kip V. Hodges,et al.  Constraints on the tectonic and landscape evolution of the Bhutan Himalaya from thermochronometry , 2015 .

[35]  Param K. Gautam,et al.  Strong seismic coupling underneath Garhwal–Kumaun region, NW Himalaya, India , 2019, Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

[36]  Timothy H. Dixon,et al.  Active deformation near the Nicoya Peninsula, northwestern Costa Rica, between 1996 and 2010: Interseismic megathrust coupling , 2012 .

[37]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[38]  An Yin,et al.  Holocene shortening across the Main Frontal Thrust zone in the eastern Himalaya , 2012 .

[39]  Walter M. Szeliga,et al.  Clockwise rotation of the Brahmaputra Valley relative to India: Tectonic convergence in the eastern Himalaya, Naga Hills, and Shillong Plateau , 2014 .

[40]  Michael A. Murphy,et al.  Segmented strain accumulation in the High Himalaya expressed in river channel steepness , 2018 .

[41]  Larry D. Brown,et al.  Crustal structure of the Himalayan orogen at ∼90° east longitude from Project INDEPTH deep reflection profiles , 1998 .

[42]  Yidong Lou,et al.  Crustal Deformation in the India‐Eurasia Collision Zone From 25 Years of GPS Measurements , 2017 .

[43]  Peter Bormann,et al.  Public Release of the ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900-2009) , 2013 .

[44]  Chaoying Zhao,et al.  InSAR-Constrained Interseismic Deformation and Potential Seismogenic Asperities on the Altyn Tagh Fault at 91.5-95°E, Northern Tibetan Plateau , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[45]  John Chen,et al.  Underplating in the Himalaya-Tibet Collision Zone Revealed by the Hi-CLIMB Experiment , 2009, Science.

[46]  György Hetényi,et al.  Stress transfer and connectivity between the Bhutan Himalaya and the Shillong Plateau , 2018, Tectonophysics.

[47]  György Hetényi,et al.  Along‐strike variations in the Himalayan orogenic wedge structure in Bhutan from ambient seismic noise tomography , 2017 .

[48]  Kusala Rajendran,et al.  Seismotectonic perspectives on the Himalayan arc and contiguous areas: Inferences from past and recent earthquakes , 2017 .

[49]  Xavier Robert,et al.  Control of detachment geometry on lateral variations in exhumation rates in the Himalaya: Insights from low‐temperature thermochronology and numerical modeling , 2011 .

[50]  D. S. Ramesh,et al.  Audit of stored strain energy and extent of future earthquake rupture in central Himalaya , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[51]  Brendan J. Meade,et al.  Spatial correlation of interseismic coupling and coseismic rupture extent of the 2011 MW = 9.0 Tohoku‐oki earthquake , 2011 .

[52]  Kutubuddin Ansari,et al.  Structural insights from geodetic Global Positioning System measurements in the Darjiling-Sikkim Himalaya , 2018, Journal of Structural Geology.

[53]  Régis Braucher,et al.  Active tectonics of the eastern Himalaya: New constraints from the first tectonic geomorphology study in southern Bhutan , 2014 .

[54]  Anne Socquet,et al.  Interseismic coupling, segmentation and mechanical behavior of the central Chile subduction zone , 2012 .

[55]  György Hetényi,et al.  Joint approach combining damage and paleoseismology observations constrains the 1714 A.D. Bhutan earthquake at magnitude 8 ± 0.5 , 2016 .

[56]  XU Caijun,et al.  Rupture of deep faults in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and uplift of the Longmen Shan , 2011 .

[57]  Didier Bourlès,et al.  Evidence for a wide and gently dipping Main Himalayan Thrust in western Bhutan , 2015 .

[58]  Jérôme Lavé,et al.  Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of central Nepal , 2001 .

[59]  Hernando Tavera,et al.  Interseismic coupling and seismic potential along the Central Andes subduction zone , 2011 .

[60]  György Hetényi,et al.  Seismotectonics of Bhutan: Evidence for segmentation of the Eastern Himalayas and link to foreland deformation , 2017 .

[61]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  Seismotectonics of the Nepal Himalaya from a local seismic network , 1999 .

[62]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Depth‐varying rupture properties of subduction zone megathrust faults , 2011 .

[63]  David Whipp,et al.  Geometry and kinematics of the Main Himalayan Thrust and Neogene crustal exhumation in the Bhutanese Himalaya derived from inversion of multithermochronologic data , 2014 .

[64]  Romain Jolivet,et al.  Segmentation of the Main Himalayan Thrust Illuminated by Bayesian Inference of Interseismic Coupling , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[65]  Roger Bilham,et al.  Plateau ‘pop-up’ in the great 1897 Assam earthquake , 2001, Nature.

[66]  L. Bollinger,et al.  Primary surface ruptures of the great Himalayan earthquakes in 1934 and 1255 , 2012, Nature Geoscience.

[67]  S. Sapkota,et al.  Estimation of coupling along the Main Himalayan Thrust in the central Himalaya , 2017 .

[68]  J. C. Savage.  A dislocation model of strain accumulation and release at a subduction zone , 1983 .

[69]  Peter Molnar,et al.  GPS measurements from the Ladakh Himalaya, India: Preliminary tests of plate-like or continuous deformation in Tibet , 2004 .

[70]  Dowchu Drukpa,et al.  Evidence of interseismic coupling variations along the Bhutan Himalayan arc from new GPS data , 2016 .

[71]  Takashi Nakata,et al.  Paleoseismological evidence of surface faulting along the northeastern Himalayan front, India: Timing, size, and spatial extent of great earthquakes , 2010 .