Fairphone: Sustainability from the Inside-Out and Outside-In

Fairphone is a social venture on a journey to demonstrate that products and supply chains can be used to create positive and fair social impact. Driven by an understanding that being ‘less bad’ is not the solution, ‘fair’ is the driving principle for product development, supply chain partnering and stakeholder engagement, keeping in mind that the concept of ‘fairness’ is an ongoing discussion and not 100 % achievable. In December 2013, the first generation Fairphone was delivered to the market, to make a statement that a phone can be built while addressing the issue of conflict minerals. The second generation Fairphone is currently in the conceptual phase and will raise the bar for internal and external stakeholder engagement. In order to transition from a campaign about conflict minerals to a social venture, Fairphone is using the story of creating the Fairphone to trigger growing interest from customers, large mobile phone manufacturers and their shareholders. Rethinking the story and facts behind consumer electronics moves sustainability from a contextual discussion to the core of the business. By starting a discussion about the way phones are built with consumers, designers, phone manufacturers and their respective shareholders, Fairphone’s ultimate aim is to eventually influence systemic change.

[1]  C. Schmidt Quicksilver & Gold: Mercury Pollution from Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  Damianagatayuvens Damianagatayuvens,et al.  Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal , 2011 .

[3]  Josh Lepawsky The changing geography of global trade in electronic discards: time to rethink the e-waste problem , 2015 .

[4]  D. Bryceson,et al.  Mining and Social Transformation in Africa : Mineralizing and Democratizing Trends in Artisanal Production , 2013 .

[5]  Melanie L. Fein,et al.  Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act , 2010 .

[6]  Marcia Narine From Kansas to the Congo: Why Naming and Shaming Corporations through Dodd-Frank's Corporate Governance Disclosure Won't Solve a Human Rights Crisis , 2012 .

[7]  P Michael Bolger,et al.  Mercury and health. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Herman Gibb,et al.  Mercury Exposure and Health Impacts among Individuals in the Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining Community: A Comprehensive Review , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  Rolf Widmer,et al.  Insights from a decade of development cooperation in e-waste management , 2013 .

[10]  Paul Collier,et al.  Natural Resources and Violent Conflict : Options and Actions , 2003 .

[11]  Laura E. Seay What’s Wrong with Dodd-Frank 1502? Conflict Minerals, Civilian Livelihoods, and The Unintended Consequences of Western Advocacy , 2012 .

[12]  J. Fobil,et al.  Working conditions and environmental exposures among electronic waste workers in Ghana , 2013, International journal of occupational and environmental health.

[13]  Hui Yang,et al.  Effects of lead and cadmium exposure from electronic waste on child physical growth , 2013, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.