Accurate Outcome Prediction in Neuroblastoma across Independent Data Sets Using a Multigene Signature

Purpose: Reliable prognostic stratification remains a challenge for cancer patients, especially for diseases with variable clinical course such as neuroblastoma. Although numerous studies have shown that outcome might be predicted using gene expression signatures, independent cross-platform validation is often lacking. Experimental Design: Using eight independent studies comprising 933 neuroblastoma patients, a prognostic gene expression classifier was developed, trained, tested, and validated. The classifier was established based on reanalysis of four published studies with updated clinical information, reannotation of the probe sequences, common risk definition for training cases, and a single method for gene selection (prediction analysis of microarray) and classification (correlation analysis). Results: Based on 250 training samples from four published microarray data sets, a correlation signature was built using 42 robust prognostic genes. The resulting classifier was validated on 351 patients from four independent and unpublished data sets and on 129 remaining test samples from the published studies. Patients with divergent outcome in the total cohort, as well as in the different risk groups, were accurately classified (log-rank P < 0.001 for overall and progression-free survival in the four independent data sets). Moreover, the 42-gene classifier was shown to be an independent predictor for survival (odds ratio, >5). Conclusion: The strength of this 42-gene classifier is its small number of genes and its cross-platform validity in which it outperforms other published prognostic signatures. The robustness and accuracy of the classifier enables prospective assessment of neuroblastoma patient outcome. Most importantly, this gene selection procedure might be an example for development and validation of robust gene expression signatures in other cancer entities. Clin Cancer Res; 16(5); 1532–41

[1]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  A Compendium to Ensure Computational Reproducibility in High-Dimensional Classification Tasks , 2004, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[2]  S. Ishii,et al.  Expression profiling using a tumor-specific cDNA microarray predicts the prognosis of intermediate risk neuroblastomas. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[3]  Ruth Ladenstein,et al.  Predicting outcomes for children with neuroblastoma using a multigene-expression signature: a retrospective SIOPEN/COG/GPOH study. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  S. Sugano,et al.  Expression profiling and characterization of 4200 genes cloned from primary neuroblastomas: identification of 305 genes differentially expressed between favorable and unfavorable subsets , 2003, Oncogene.

[5]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Imbalance of the mitochondrial pro- and anti-apoptotic mediators in neuroblastoma tumours with unfavourable biology. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[6]  Yusuke Nakamura,et al.  Maturational sequence of neuroblastoma revealed by molecular analysis on cDNA microarrays. , 2002, International journal of oncology.

[7]  Holger Christiansen,et al.  Loss of a FYN-regulated differentiation and growth arrest pathway in advanced stage neuroblastoma. , 2002, Cancer cell.

[8]  Stefan Michiels,et al.  Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy , 2005, The Lancet.

[9]  Qing-Rong Chen,et al.  An integrated cross-platform prognosis study on neuroblastoma patients. , 2008, Genomics.

[10]  F. Berthold,et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment. , 1993, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[11]  H. Varmus,et al.  Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage. , 1984, Science.

[12]  A. Look,et al.  Cellular DNA content as a predictor of response to chemotherapy in infants with unresectable neuroblastoma. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Tinker,et al.  The challenges of gene expression microarrays for the study of human cancer. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[15]  E. Hiyama,et al.  Expression profiling of favorable and unfavorable neuroblastomas , 2003, Pediatric Surgery International.

[16]  R Simon,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic prediction using gene expression profiles in high-dimensional microarray data , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  John M Maris,et al.  The biologic basis for neuroblastoma heterogeneity and risk stratification , 2005, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[18]  R. Seeger,et al.  Molecular analysis and clinical significance of N-myc amplification and chromosome 1p monosomy in human neuroblastomas. , 1988, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[19]  Qing-Rong Chen,et al.  Prediction of Clinical Outcome Using Gene Expression Profiling and Artificial Neural Networks for Patients with Neuroblastoma , 2004, Cancer Research.

[20]  Barbara Hero,et al.  The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  William C Reinhold,et al.  MatchMiner: a tool for batch navigation among gene and gene product identifiers , 2003, Genome Biology.

[22]  G. Sherlock,et al.  The prognostic role of a gene signature from tumorigenic breast-cancer cells. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  K K Matthay,et al.  The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system) , 1999, Cancer.

[24]  Roland Eils,et al.  Cross-study analysis of gene expression data for intermediate neuroblastoma identifies two biological subtypes , 2007, BMC Cancer.

[25]  Patrick Warnat,et al.  Customized oligonucleotide microarray gene expression-based classification of neuroblastoma patients outperforms current clinical risk stratification. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  A. Evans,et al.  A proposed staging for children with neuroblastoma. Children's cancer study group A , 1971, Cancer.

[27]  H. Aburatani,et al.  Gene expression profiling and identification of novel prognostic marker genes in neuroblastoma , 2004, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[28]  W. Gerald,et al.  Integrative genomics identifies distinct molecular classes of neuroblastoma and shows that multiple genes are targeted by regional alterations in DNA copy number. , 2006, Cancer research.

[29]  Antonio Ortega,et al.  Prognostic significance of gene expression profiles of metastatic neuroblastomas lacking MYCN gene amplification. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.