SCIB2, an antibody DNA vaccine encoding NY-ESO-1 epitopes, induces potent antitumor immunity which is further enhanced by checkpoint blockade

ABSTRACT Checkpoint blockade has demonstrated promising antitumor responses in approximately 10–40% of patients. However, the majority of patients do not make a productive immune response to their tumors and do not respond to checkpoint blockade. These patients may benefit from an effective vaccine that stimulates high-avidity T cell responses in combination with checkpoint blockade. We have previously shown that incorporating TRP-2 and gp100 epitopes into the CDR regions of a human IgG1 DNA (ImmunoBody®: IB) results in significant tumor regression both in animal models and patients. This vaccination strategy is superior to others as it targets antigen to antigen-presenting cells and stimulates high-avidity T cell responses. To broaden the application of this vaccination strategy, 16 NY-ESO-1 epitopes, covering over 80% of HLA phenotypes, were incorporated into the IB (SCIB2). They produced higher frequency and avidity T cell responses than peptide vaccination. These T cells were of sufficient avidity to kill NY-ESO-1-expressing tumor cells, and in vivo controlled the growth of established B16-NY-ESO-1 tumors, resulting in long-term survival (35%). When SCIB2 was given in combination with Treg depletion, CTLA-4 blockade or PD-1 blockade, long-term survival from established tumors was significantly enhanced to 56, 67 and 100%, respectively. Translating these responses into the clinic by using a combination of SCIB2 vaccination and checkpoint blockade can only further improve clinical responses.

[1]  M. Valsecchi Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Plummer,et al.  Abstract 9035: An adjuvant clinical trial of SCIB1, a DNA vaccine that targets dendritic cells in vivo, in fully resected melanoma patients , 2015 .

[3]  N. Matsumura,et al.  IFN-γ from lymphocytes induces PD-L1 expression and promotes progression of ovarian cancer , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  H. Kohrt,et al.  Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients , 2014, Nature.

[7]  Maxim N. Artyomov,et al.  Checkpoint Blockade Cancer Immunotherapy Targets Tumour-Specific Mutant Antigens , 2014, Nature.

[8]  Shilpa Gupta,et al.  PD-1 pathway inhibitors: changing the landscape of cancer immunotherapy. , 2014, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[9]  N. Kerkvliet,et al.  Suppression of acute graft-versus-host response by TCDD is independent of the CTLA-4-IFN-γ-IDO pathway. , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[10]  Jason B. Williams,et al.  Up-Regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and Tregs in the Melanoma Tumor Microenvironment Is Driven by CD8+ T Cells , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[11]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Fc-dependent depletion of tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells co-defines the efficacy of anti–CTLA-4 therapy against melanoma , 2013, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[12]  V. Bronte,et al.  High-avidity T cells are preferentially tolerized in the tumor microenvironment. , 2013, Cancer research.

[13]  M. Jure-Kunkel,et al.  CTLA-4 blockade in tumor models: an overview of preclinical and translational research. , 2013, Cancer immunity.

[14]  N. Mifsud,et al.  A Novel HLA-B18 Restricted CD8+ T Cell Epitope Is Efficiently Cross-Presented by Dendritic Cells from Soluble Tumor Antigen , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Hiroaki Tanaka,et al.  Multipeptide immune response to cancer vaccine IMA901 after single-dose cyclophosphamide associates with longer patient survival , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[16]  R. Metheringham,et al.  High Avidity Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Can Be Selected into the Memory Pool but They Are Exquisitely Sensitive to Functional Impairment , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  David C. Smith,et al.  Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  M. Raffeld,et al.  Tumor regression in patients with metastatic synovial cell sarcoma and melanoma using genetically engineered lymphocytes reactive with NY-ESO-1. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  L. Old,et al.  Clinical Cancer esearch ing , Diagnosis , Prognosis essment of Vaccine-Induced CD 4 T Cell Responses to the-143 Immunodominant Region of the Tumor-Specific R igen NY-ESO-1 Using DRB 1 * 0101 Tetramers , 2010 .

[20]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  H. Wada,et al.  Three novel NY-ESO-1 epitopes bound to DRB1*0803, DQB1*0401 and DRB1*0901 recognized by CD4 T cells from CHP-NY-ESO-1-vaccinated patients. , 2010, Vaccine.

[22]  S. van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk,et al.  Electroporation for DNA immunization: clinical application , 2010, Expert review of vaccines.

[23]  R. Metheringham,et al.  DNA vaccination with T‐cell epitopes encoded within Ab molecules induces high‐avidity anti‐tumor CD8+ T cells , 2010, European journal of immunology.

[24]  J. Allison,et al.  PD-1 and CTLA-4 combination blockade expands infiltrating T cells and reduces regulatory T and myeloid cells within B16 melanoma tumors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  日野 亮介 Tumor cell expression of programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 is a prognostic factor for malignant melanoma , 2010 .

[26]  Loise M. Francisco,et al.  PD-L1 regulates the development, maintenance, and function of induced regulatory T cells , 2009, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[27]  R. Vonderheide,et al.  Clinical Use of Anti‐CD25 Antibody Daclizumab to Enhance Immune Responses to Tumor Antigen Vaccination by Targeting Regulatory T cells , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Daohai Yu,et al.  PD1 blockade reverses the suppression of melanoma antigen-specific CTL by CD4+ CD25(Hi) regulatory T cells. , 2009, International immunology.

[29]  L. Old,et al.  Vaccination with Recombinant NY-ESO-1 Protein Elicits Immunodominant HLA-DR52b-restricted CD4+ T Cell Responses with a Conserved T Cell Receptor Repertoire , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[30]  L. Durrant,et al.  Antibodies designed as effective cancer vaccines , 2009, mAbs.

[31]  J. Tiercy,et al.  Modified tumour antigen-encoding mRNA facilitates the analysis of naturally occurring and vaccine-induced CD4 and CD8 T cells in cancer patients , 2009, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[32]  K. Odunsi,et al.  Recognition of naturally processed and ovarian cancer reactive CD8+ T cell epitopes within a promiscuous HLA class II T-helper region of NY-ESO-1 , 2008, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[33]  P. Chiarella,et al.  Electroporation of skeletal muscle induces danger signal release and antigen-presenting cell recruitment independently of DNA vaccine administration. , 2008, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[34]  V. Cerundolo,et al.  Immunization with a Lentivector That Targets Tumor Antigen Expression to Dendritic Cells Induces Potent CD8+ and CD4+ T-Cell Responses , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[35]  M. Birchall,et al.  Primary CD4+ T-Cell Responses Provide both Helper and Cytotoxic Functions during Epstein-Barr Virus Infection and Transformation of Fetal Cord Blood B Cells , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[36]  O. Lantz,et al.  CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells. , 2005, Blood.

[37]  D. Jäger,et al.  LUD 00-009: phase 1 study of intensive course immunization with NY-ESO-1 peptides in HLA-A2 positive patients with NY-ESO-1-expressing cancer. , 2007, Cancer immunity.

[38]  D. Jäger,et al.  Recombinant vaccinia/fowlpox NY-ESO-1 vaccines induce both humoral and cellular NY-ESO-1-specific immune responses in cancer patients , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Lisa M. Ebert,et al.  Directions in the immune targeting of cancer: Lessons learned from the cancer‐testis Ag NY‐ESO‐1 , 2006, Immunology and cell biology.

[40]  J. Cheville,et al.  Tumor B7-H1 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients with long-term follow-up. , 2006, Cancer research.

[41]  K. Hatakeyama,et al.  Heterogeneous expression of GAGE, NY‐ESO‐1, MAGE‐A and SSX proteins in esophageal cancer: Implications for immunotherapy , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[42]  V. Brusic,et al.  One NY-ESO-1-Derived Epitope That Promiscuously Binds to Multiple HLA-DR and HLA-DP4 Molecules and Stimulates Autologous CD4+ T Cells from Patients with NY-ESO-1-Expressing Melanoma1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[43]  M. Shackleton,et al.  Characterization of antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocyte responses in skin and peripheral blood following intradermal peptide vaccination. , 2005, Cancer immunity.

[44]  H. Nagai,et al.  In vivo elimination of CD25+ regulatory T cells leads to tumor rejection of B16F10 melanoma, when combined with interleukin‐12 gene transfer , 2004, Experimental dermatology.

[45]  J. McCluskey,et al.  Immunodominant CD4+ responses identified in a patient vaccinated with full-length NY-ESO-1 formulated with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  F. Tanaka,et al.  Identification of HLA-A24-Restricted CTL Epitope from Cancer-Testis Antigen, NY-ESO-1, and Induction of a Specific Antitumor Immune Response , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[47]  Francine Jotereau,et al.  Identification of Five New HLA-B*3501-Restricted Epitopes Derived from Common Melanoma-Associated Antigens, Spontaneously Recognized by Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[48]  D. Jäger,et al.  Identification of a naturally processed NY-ESO-1 peptide recognized by CD8+ T cells in the context of HLA-B51. , 2002, Cancer immunity.

[49]  V. Brusic,et al.  NY-ESO-1 119-143 is a promiscuous major histocompatibility complex class II T-helper epitope recognized by Th1- and Th2-type tumor-reactive CD4+ T cells. , 2002, Cancer research.

[50]  T. Schumacher,et al.  Synergism of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte–Associated Antigen 4 Blockade and Depletion of Cd25+ Regulatory T Cells in Antitumor Therapy Reveals Alternative Pathways for Suppression of Autoreactive Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Responses , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[51]  J. Ting,et al.  Constitutive Expression of MHC Class II Genes in Melanoma Cell Lines Results from the Transcription of Class II Transactivator Abnormally Initiated from Its B Cell-Specific Promoter1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[52]  D. Jäger,et al.  Induction of primary NY-ESO-1 immunity: CD8+ T lymphocyte and antibody responses in peptide-vaccinated patients with NY-ESO-1+ cancers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  V. Cerundolo,et al.  Strategy for monitoring T cell responses to NY-ESO-1 in patients with any HLA class I allele. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  V Brusic,et al.  NY-ESO-1 encodes DRB1*0401-restricted epitopes recognized by melanoma-reactive CD4+ T cells. , 2000, Cancer research.

[55]  D. Speiser,et al.  Naturally occurring human lymphocyte antigen-A2 restricted CD8+ T-cell response to the cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1 in melanoma patients. , 2000, Cancer research.

[56]  V. Cerundolo,et al.  Identification of NY-ESO-1 Peptide Analogues Capable of Improved Stimulation of Tumor-Reactive CTL1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[57]  D. Jäger,et al.  Monitoring CD8 T cell responses to NY-ESO-1: correlation of humoral and cellular immune responses. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  D. Jäger,et al.  Identification of Ny-Eso-1 Epitopes Presented by Human Histocompatibility Antigen (Hla)-Drb4*0101–0103 and Recognized by Cd4+T Lymphocytes of Patients with Ny-Eso-1–Expressing Melanoma , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[59]  A. Khoruts,et al.  CTLA-4 blockade reverses CD8+ T cell tolerance to tumor by a CD4+ T cell- and IL-2-dependent mechanism. , 1999, Immunity.

[60]  T. Fujita,et al.  Tumor rejection by in vivo administration of anti-CD25 (interleukin-2 receptor alpha) monoclonal antibody. , 1999, Cancer research.

[61]  D. Schrump,et al.  NY-ESO-1 may be a potential target for lung cancer immunotherapy. , 1999, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[62]  D. Jäger,et al.  Simultaneous Humoral and Cellular Immune Response against Cancer–Testis Antigen NY-ESO-1: Definition of Human Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-A2–binding Peptide Epitopes , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[63]  W. Reith,et al.  Regulation of MHC class II genes: lessons from a disease. , 1996, Annual review of immunology.

[64]  B. Mach,et al.  Regulation of MHC class II expression by interferon-gamma mediated by the transactivator gene CIITA. , 1994, Science.