Estimating above-ground biomass in young forests with airborne laser scanning

Total above-ground biomass of spruce, pine and birch was estimated in three different field datasets collected in young forests in south-east Norway. The mean heights ranged from 1.77 to 9.66 m. These field data were regressed against metrics derived from canopy height distributions generated from airborne laser scanner (ALS) data with a point density of 0.9–1.2 m−2. The field data consisted of 79 plots with size 200–232.9 m2 and 20 stands with an average size of 3742 m2. Total above-ground biomass ranged from 2.27 to 90.42 Mg ha−1. The influences of (1) regression model form, (2) canopy threshold value and (3) tree species on the relationships between biomass and ALS-derived metrics were assessed. The analysed model forms were multiple linear models, models with logarithmic transformation of the response and explanatory variables, and models with square root transformation of the response. The different canopy thresholds considered were fixed values of 0.5, 1.3 and 2.0 m defining the limit between laser canopy echoes and below-canopy echoes. The proportion of explained variability of the estimated models ranged from 60% to 83%. Tree species had a significant influence on the models. For given values of the ALS-derived metrics related to canopy height and canopy density, spruce tended to have higher above-ground biomass values than pine and deciduous species. There were no clear effects of model form and canopy threshold on the accuracy of predictions produced by cross validation of the various models, but there is a risk of heteroskedasticity with linear models. Cross validation revealed an accuracy of the root mean square error (RMSE) ranging from 3.85 to 13.9 Mg ha−1, corresponding to 22.6% to 48.1% of mean field-measured biomass. It was concluded that airborne laser scanning has a potential for predicting biomass in young forest stands (> 0.5 ha) with an accuracy of 20–30% of mean ground value.

[1]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[2]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes , 2002 .

[3]  E. Næsset Accuracy of forest inventory using airborne laser scanning: evaluating the first nordic full-scale operational project , 2004 .

[4]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimation of above- and below-ground biomass across regions of the boreal forest zone using airborne laser , 2008 .

[5]  R. Nelson,et al.  Regional aboveground forest biomass using airborne and spaceborne LiDAR in Québec. , 2008 .

[6]  E. Næsset Effects of Differential Single- and Dual-Frequency GPS and GLONASS Observations on Point Accuracy under Forest Canopies , 2001 .

[7]  Tian-Yuan Shih,et al.  Error assessment in two lidar-derived TIN datasets , 2006 .

[8]  E. Næsset Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data , 2009 .

[9]  E. Næsset Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[10]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[11]  R. Nelson,et al.  A Multiple Resource Inventory of Delaware Using Airborne Laser Data , 2003 .

[12]  M. Kimberley,et al.  ESTIMATION OF CARBON STOCKS IN NEW ZEALAND PLANTED FORESTS USING AIRBORNE SCANNING LIDAR , 2007 .

[13]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree heights and number of stems in young forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 2001 .

[14]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[15]  T. Lundmark,et al.  Functions for Biomass Estimation of Young Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. from Stands in Northern Sweden with High Stand Densities , 2001 .

[16]  E. Næsset,et al.  Weibull and percentile models for lidar-based estimation of basal area distribution , 2005 .

[17]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Using airborne laser scanning to monitor tree migration in the boreal–alpine transition zone , 2007 .

[18]  Edward W. Bork,et al.  Influence of Vegetation, Slope, and Lidar Sampling Angle on DEM Accuracy , 2006 .

[19]  S. J. Sutley,et al.  USGS Digital Spectral Library splib05a , 2003 .

[20]  R. G. Oderwald,et al.  Separating the ground and airborne laser sampling phases to estimate tropical forest basal area, volume, and biomass , 1997 .

[21]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Above-ground biomass estimation in closed canopy Neotropical forests using lidar remote sensing: factors affecting the generality of relationships , 2003 .

[22]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Assessing effects of laser point density, ground sampling intensity, and field sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2008 .

[23]  L. Marklund,et al.  Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden , 1988 .

[24]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation: Empirical Assessment and Error Budget , 2004 .

[25]  W. W. Carson,et al.  Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy , 2003 .

[26]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[27]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Sampling and Mapping Forest Volume and Biomass Using Airborne LIDARs , 2009 .

[28]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Sensitivity of large-footprint lidar to canopy structure and biomass in a neotropical rainforest , 2002 .

[29]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[30]  James W. Flewelling,et al.  Multiplicative Regression with Lognormal Errors , 1981 .

[31]  M. Nilsson Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[32]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of stem volume using laser scanning-based canopy height metrics , 2006 .

[33]  J. Holmgren Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[34]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An analysis of variance test for normality ( complete samp 1 es ) t , 2007 .

[35]  T. Hassard,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005 .

[36]  R. Hill,et al.  Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data , 2003 .

[37]  E. Naesset,et al.  Assessing Point Accuracy of DGPS Under Forest Canopy Before Data Acquisition, in the Field and After Postprocessing , 2002 .

[38]  H. Braastad,et al.  Growth model computer program for Pinus sylvestris. , 1980 .

[39]  Robert C. Parker,et al.  An Application of LiDAR in a Double-Sample Forest Inventory , 2004 .

[40]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[41]  T. Dawson,et al.  Quantifying forest above ground carbon content using LiDAR remote sensing , 2004 .

[42]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Comparing stand inventories for large areas based on photo-interpretation and laser scanning by means of cost-plus-loss analyses , 2004 .

[43]  J. Means Use of Large-Footprint Scanning Airborne Lidar To Estimate Forest Stand Characteristics in the Western Cascades of Oregon , 1999 .

[44]  Malik Beshir Malik,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005, Technometrics.

[45]  P. Treitz,et al.  Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: an examination of scanning density , 2006 .

[46]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Measuring biomass and carbon in delaware using an airborne profiling LIDAR , 2004 .

[47]  W. Cohen,et al.  Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA , 1999 .

[48]  E. Næsset Airborne laser scanning as a method in operational forest inventory: Status of accuracy assessments accomplished in Scandinavia , 2007 .

[49]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[50]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data , 1988 .

[51]  K. Lim,et al.  Estimation of above ground forest biomass from airborne discrete return laser scanner data using canopy-based quantile estimators , 2004 .

[52]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[53]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Applied Linear Regression (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[54]  R. Nelson,et al.  Regression Estimation Following the Square-Root Transformation of the Response , 2008, Forest Science.