Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: prediction of the tumor grade using CT findings and computerized texture analysis

Background Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) include heterogeneous tumors with a variable degree of inherent biologic aggressiveness represented by the histopathologic grade. Although several studies investigated the computed tomography (CT) characteristics which can predict the histopathologic grade of PNET, accurate prediction of the PNET grade by CT examination alone is still limited. Purpose To investigate the important CT findings and CT texture variables for prediction of grade of PNET. Material and Methods Sixty-six patients with pathologically confirmed PNETs (grade 1 = 45, grades 2/3 = 21) underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT. Two reviewers determined the presence of predefined CT findings. CT texture was also analyzed on arterial and portal phase using both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed in order to identify significant predictors for tumor grade. Results Among CT findings and CT texture variables, the significant predictors for grade 2/3 tumors were an ill-defined margin (odds ratio [OR] = 7.273), lower sphericity (OR = 0.409) on arterial 2D analysis, higher skewness (OR = 1.972) and lower sphericity (OR = 0.408) on arterial 3D analysis, lower kurtosis (OR = 0.436) and lower sphericity (OR = 0.420) on portal 2D analysis, and a larger surface area (OR = 2.007) and lower sphericity (OR = 0.503) on portal 3D analysis (P < 0.05). Diagnostic performance of texture analysis was superior to CT findings (AUC = 0.774 vs. 0.683). Conclusion CT is useful for predicting grade 2/3 PNET using not only the imaging findings including an ill-defined margin, but also the CT texture variables such as lower sphericity, higher skewness, and lower kurtosis.

[1]  C. Good,et al.  Measurements of heterogeneity in gliomas on computed tomography relationship to tumour grade , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[2]  L. T. DeCarlo On the meaning and use of kurtosis. , 1997 .

[3]  N. Adsay,et al.  Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas: Current Concepts and Controversies , 2014, Endocrine Pathology.

[4]  B. Choi,et al.  Staging accuracy of MR for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and imaging findings according to the tumor grade , 2013, Abdominal Imaging.

[5]  F. Bosman,et al.  WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System , 2010 .

[6]  V. Goh,et al.  Assessment of primary colorectal cancer heterogeneity by using whole-tumor texture analysis: contrast-enhanced CT texture as a biomarker of 5-year survival. , 2013, Radiology.

[7]  V. Vilgrain,et al.  Endocrine Pancreatic Tumours and Helical CT: Contrast Enhancement Is Correlated with Microvascular Density, Histoprognostic Factors and Survival , 2006, Pancreatology.

[8]  Bal Sanghera,et al.  Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? , 2012, Insights into Imaging.

[9]  Domenico Coppola,et al.  The Pathologic Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Review of Nomenclature, Grading, and Staging Systems , 2010, Pancreas.

[10]  Balaji Ganeshan,et al.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT , 2013, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[11]  Dina Muin,et al.  Texture-based classification of different gastric tumors at contrast-enhanced CT. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[12]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Computerized texture analysis of persistent part-solid ground-glass nodules: differentiation of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. , 2014, Radiology.

[13]  J. H. Kim,et al.  Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas at dynamic enhanced CT: comparison between grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma and grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumour , 2015, European Radiology.

[14]  M. Giger,et al.  Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance images , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Sang Joon Park,et al.  Glioma: Application of Whole-Tumor Texture Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Evaluation of Tumor Heterogeneity , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  D. Sahani,et al.  Incidental neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: MDCT findings and features of malignancy. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Walter G. Park,et al.  Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiographic Calcifications Correlate with Grade and Metastasis , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[18]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Textural analysis of contrast‐enhanced MR images of the breast , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Rajan T. Gupta,et al.  MDCT evaluation of the pancreas: nuts and bolts. , 2012, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  Pierre Bedossa,et al.  Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors. , 2009, Radiology.

[21]  Lifen Yan,et al.  Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma by texture analysis on CT images. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[22]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Usefulness of Texture Analysis in Differentiating Transient from Persistent Part-solid Nodules(PSNs): A Retrospective Study , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  H. Eskola,et al.  Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[24]  F. Albregtsen Statistical Texture Measures Computed from Gray Level Coocurrence Matrices , 2008 .

[25]  Young Jae Kim,et al.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET): Staging accuracy of MDCT and its diagnostic performance for the differentiation of PNET with uncommon CT findings from pancreatic adenocarcinoma , 2016, European Radiology.

[26]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.